banning vpns has been suggested a lot. three times in fact. I also recommend that you add upload images to website for emojies

make the studio cooldowns shorter is rejected

the_awsome_penguinja wrote:

make the studio cooldowns shorter is rejected

looking at that rejection reason, I have to ask, was people using Scratch's studios to advertise off-site products an actual problem? I never encountered it myself.

Just noticed two inconsistencies in the Table of Contents for you.
1.8 “Control mouse pointer” block should be 1.8 Blocks that control the mouse pointer
2.4 Revert back to older versions of Scratch should be 2.4 Revert back to older versions of the Scratch editor

Why does TOLORS take so long to load?
6.5's title is ambiguous; is the suggestion for putting those words in the filter or banning them?

<0-0::sensing>//This is Charles; he protects my signature from evil kumquats.
when I'm spawned::events hat//This is the code Charles' brain runs on.
forever
if <[100] > (distance to [an evil kumquat v])> then
delete the evil kumquat::control
end
end

Adding the Scratch font back is rejected, for obvious legal reasons.

FezziwigJunior wrote:

Why don’t they want online detectors?

Hackers.

when green flag clicked
forever
go to [my profile v]
if <[done with scratch] = [yes]> then
set [screen v] to [MINECRAFTTTTTTTTTTTTTT]
if <[mom says hop off the computer] = [yes]> then
cry
end

EDawg2011 wrote:

Why does TOLORS take so long to load?

many many posts and pages, plus the OP is LONG
here's one that loads faster

when tuned to [drop c v] :: hat events
repeat until <drenched in sweat? :: sensing>
blast some epic [system of a down v] riffs :: motion
end

stop celebrating pi day was rejected

Xzillox wrote:

EDawg2011 wrote:

#8306
Why does TOLORS take so long to load?

many many posts and pages, plus the OP is LONG

The OP is long, but it doesn't load all 416 pages of posts at once; otherwise it would take forever.

the_awsome_penguinja wrote:

stop celebrating pi day was rejected

TOLORS is only for the most commonly-suggested rejected suggestions.

mumu245 wrote:

#8307
Adding the Scratch font back is rejected, for obvious legal reasons.

Please give a link for proof that it's rejected.

<0-0::sensing>//This is Charles; he protects my signature from evil kumquats.
when I'm spawned::events hat//This is the code Charles' brain runs on.
forever
if <[100] > (distance to [an evil kumquat v])> then
delete the evil kumquat::control
end
end

EDawg2011 wrote:

the_awsome_penguinja wrote:

stop celebrating pi day was rejected

TOLORS is only for the most commonly-suggested rejected suggestions.

Yes, but did you forget this?

Za-Chary then wrote:

Recently, you wrote:

TOLORS is only supposed to have rejected suggestions that may be frequently suggested.

Correct, but if a suggestion is rejected, then it should be posted here. That way I can be made aware that it was suggested, and then make a decision on whether or not it was frequently suggested. After all, I can't make a judgment on whether or not a suggestion was frequently suggested if I don't know how often they get suggested!

undeterminstic wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

Hmm. That's quite a few times, and they're all relatively recent. Should I add it to the list? Who has thoughts about this?

I feel like they could be part of the image forum one

Emojis aren't really exclusive to the forums though, right? I'm not sure if it makes sense to put it there.

Roblox888i wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

Roblox888i wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/746130/ This is not rejected.

Sure it is. You are asking to set the editor to look like an older version of Scratch. That is already on the list (see 2.3).

This is saying to go back to scratch 2.0 or 1.4.
It's not an older version, its still 3.0.

Thanks for pointing this out. I've edited the list to state that the suggestions are about any older version of Scratch and remove some emphasis on 1.4 and 2.0. Also, in 2.3 and 2.4, I've removed the parts about downloading previous versions of offline editors, since it seems that you cannot download the Scratch 2.0 offline editor at the moment.

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

What happens when this topic hits the page limit (500 posts)?

There does not exist a “page limit” of 500 pages. Here is a topic that reached 501 pages: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/626187/

undeterminstic wrote:

banning vpns has been suggested a lot. three times in fact. I also recommend that you add upload images to website for emojies

Do you have examples of when this was suggested?

the_awsome_penguinja wrote:

make the studio cooldowns shorter is rejected

Thanks! I probably won't add it at this time.

Catscratcher07 wrote:

the_awsome_penguinja wrote:

make the studio cooldowns shorter is rejected

looking at that rejection reason, I have to ask, was people using Scratch's studios to advertise off-site products an actual problem? I never encountered it myself.

As someone who was a Scratch Team member at the time when this was a problem — yes, it was an actual problem.

-InsanityGames- wrote:

Just noticed two inconsistencies in the Table of Contents for you.
1.8 “Control mouse pointer” block should be 1.8 Blocks that control the mouse pointer
2.4 Revert back to older versions of Scratch should be 2.4 Revert back to older versions of the Scratch editor

Thanks! Fixed. Although I'm not happy with the wording "Revert back to older versions of the Scratch editor" anymore — I feel like maybe it would be appropriate to allow this suggestion to encompass reverting back to older versions of the Scratch website, too. I'm not sure why I changed it in the first place.

EDawg2011 wrote:

Why does TOLORS take so long to load?
6.5's title is ambiguous; is the suggestion for putting those words in the filter or banning them?

The suggestion is for putting those words in the filter. I've edited the title/description to make this more clear.

mumu245 wrote:

Adding the Scratch font back is rejected, for obvious legal reasons.

Sounds correct, but do you have examples of when this was suggested?

the_awsome_penguinja wrote:

stop celebrating pi day was rejected

Thanks! I don't need to add this to the list.

EDawg2011 wrote:

the_awsome_penguinja wrote:

stop celebrating pi day was rejected

TOLORS is only for the most commonly-suggested rejected suggestions.

Correct, but if a suggestion is rejected, then it should be posted here. That way I can be made aware that it was suggested, and then make a decision on whether or not it was frequently suggested. After all, I can't make a judgment on whether or not a suggestion was frequently suggested if I don't know how often they get suggested!

chippysmall4 wrote:

Making Custom Emojis On Scratch Is Rejected.

Post Bump

chippysmall4 wrote:

chippysmall4 wrote:

Making Custom Emojis On Scratch Is Rejected.

Post Bump

@Za-Chary already responded to a post relating to custom emojis.

Za-Chary wrote:

Emojis aren't really exclusive to the forums though, right? I'm not sure if it makes sense to put it there.

Sorry I wasn't clear. I mean replace the Upload Images to Forums with Upload Images to Website and include the emoji thing.

Are AI image things rejected?
i hope
just asking incase it could get added to this list

misread post, ignore

oof, I wish we could do some of these but I'm relieved that when I quit I can still come back unlike roblox