cs1093855 wrote:

get_it_prince_xD wrote:

when stop sign clicked

this is a good thing to use with a thumbnail

I agree! But for now we have to use this workaround:

when green flag clicked
forever
reset timer
end

when [timer v] > (0.1)
...

get_it_prince_xD wrote:

cs1093855 wrote:

get_it_prince_xD wrote:

when stop sign clicked

this is a good thing to use with a thumbnail

I agree! But for now we have to use this workaround:

when green flag clicked
forever
reset timer
end

when [timer v] > (0.1)
...

im glad u agree

when green flag clicked

when green flag clicked
set [ghost v] effect to (100)

Za-Chary wrote:

I have generalized #8.4 from “Allow Scratchers to moderate the forums” to “Allow Scratchers to moderate the website.”

It is certainly rejected for forums, and so it is logical that having just anyone moderate the website is also rejected. (From experience, the website tends to be rather worse than the forums anyway.)

3009088 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

I have generalized #8.4 from “Allow Scratchers to moderate the forums” to “Allow Scratchers to moderate the website.”

It is certainly rejected for forums, and so it is logical that having just anyone moderate the website is also rejected. (From experience, the website tends to be rather worse than the forums anyway.)

Wait, so scratchers are allowed to moderate the forums?

Za-Chary wrote:

3009088 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

I have generalized #8.4 from “Allow Scratchers to moderate the forums” to “Allow Scratchers to moderate the website.”

It is certainly rejected for forums, and so it is logical that having just anyone moderate the website is also rejected. (From experience, the website tends to be rather worse than the forums anyway.)

Wait, so scratchers are allowed to moderate the forums?

Nope — have you seen any ordinary Scratchers sticky, close, or move topics? Since it is on this list, it is rejected — ordinary Scratchers will not have the privilege of moderating the forums, or the entire website.

StrangeMagic32 wrote:

get_it_prince_xD wrote:

cs1093855 wrote:

get_it_prince_xD wrote:

when stop sign clicked

this is a good thing to use with a thumbnail

I agree! But for now we have to use this workaround:

when green flag clicked
forever
reset timer
end

when [timer v] > (0.1)
...

im glad u agree

again, the stop sign is to stop a project not start one. That's what

when green flag clicked

is for…

and for thumbnails just do

when green flag clicked
set [ghost v] effect to (100)

3009088 wrote:

Hmm really? So why does LiFaytheGoblin is a forum moderator even though he is a regular scratcher?

Za-Chary wrote:

3009088 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

I have generalized #8.4 from “Allow Scratchers to moderate the forums” to “Allow Scratchers to moderate the website.”

It is certainly rejected for forums, and so it is logical that having just anyone moderate the website is also rejected. (From experience, the website tends to be rather worse than the forums anyway.)

Wait, so scratchers are allowed to moderate the forums?

Nope — have you seen any ordinary Scratchers sticky, close, or move topics? Since it is on this list, it is rejected — ordinary Scratchers will not have the privilege of moderating the forums, or the entire website.

Za-Chary wrote:

3009088 wrote:

Hmm really? So why does LiFaytheGoblin is a forum moderator even though he is a regular scratcher?

I don't know. I think they were a part of the Community Moderator program before it was removed.

3009088 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

3009088 wrote:

Hmm really? So why does LiFaytheGoblin is a forum moderator even though he is a regular scratcher?

I don't know. I think they were a part of the Community Moderator program before it was removed.

Maybe. Then why didn't the ST take the words, “Forum Moderator” under their names? I still see it.

Za-Chary wrote:

4.4 Remove character limits on text fields
This is placed to prevent spam. If any character limits were removed entirely, spammers could use this to paste large blocks of text, effectively taking up server space and slowing down the website.

Simply raising the limits, however, is NOT rejected. You can discuss various character limits on the following topics: About Me and What I'm Working On, Project Comments, or Studio Descriptions.

Za-Chary wrote:

8.5 Notifications for being quoted in topics
Due to the way that the forum structure works, this suggestion simply is not possible to add. There is also a very high possibility of getting spammed with unwanted notifications. The technical issues and the potential for abuse make this feature rather impractical. If you want to stay updated on a certain topic, you can always follow the topic and get notified on new posts that are made.

Botcho_Otkho wrote:

I found this one, but I'm not sure it's in the list.

Za-Chary wrote:

Botcho_Otkho wrote:

I found this one, but I'm not sure it's in the list.

I did see that. The user who posted that notice told me that there are more rejected suggestions like this, and so before I add any to the list, I'd like to see their entire list.

I feel like this is suggested frequently enough to go on the list, if needed. I'll give it some more thought.

Za-Chary wrote:

3009088 wrote:

Hmm really? So why does LiFaytheGoblin is a forum moderator even though he is a regular scratcher?

I don't know. I think they were a part of the Community Moderator program before it was removed.

Za-Chary wrote:

Another update! I have added another suggestion to the list: “Notifications for being quoted in topics”. In fact, I rejected this one! (And @Paddle2See* helped and approved.)

This seems to have been suggested a few times — and, simply put, this is not something we would be able to add in, just due to how the forums work. It likely would lead to a lot of unwanted messages, too, through spam or otherwise.

This was actually rejected many years ago by @cheddargirl — interesting that we didn't get to it until now.

Za-Chary wrote:

8.5 Notifications for being quoted in topics
Due to the way that the forum structure works, this suggestion simply is not possible to add. There is also a very high possibility of getting spammed with unwanted notifications. The technical issues and the potential for abuse make this feature rather impractical. If you want to stay updated on a certain topic, you can always follow the topic and get notified on new posts that are made.

cs1093855 wrote:

Why would you put a smiley face for a rejected topic? That’s just… weird!

Za-Chary wrote:

cs1093855 wrote:

Why would you put a smiley face for a rejected topic? That’s just… weird!

I am proud of myself for helping out and contributing to the forums.

Reply to [Za-Chary v] :: events hat
Say [okay, if you say so...] for (2) secs