historical_supa wrote:

Okay, for one thing, they should change the color of the event blocks. The color is very ugly to me.

VedanshS933 wrote:

historical_supa wrote:

Okay, for one thing, they should change the color of the event blocks. The color is very ugly to me.

Does it contribute to the suggestion? If only for Horizontal Blocks then ok , but else create a new topic!

VedanshS933 wrote:

historical_supa wrote:

Okay, for one thing, they should change the color of the event blocks. The color is very ugly to me.

Does it contribute to the suggestion? If only for Horizontal Blocks then ok , but else create a new topic!

GabrielBoms wrote:

VedanshS933 wrote:

(#81)

ayandhisarmy wrote:

i support,it looks neat and i think i have a solution to the say block problem

.  :: #4444FF



// hello there hello there 
// hello there hello there 
// hello there hello there 
// hello there hello there v

the text would be shortened,but you can click a dropdown to see more.

The Only Icons blocks suggestion has another way to solve it. Eventhrough it's completely different

King of The Page!
Scratch On!

hmmm

Conduit7 wrote:

support this just looks so much nicer and should be added at least for design

repeat until <(i) > ((n) * (n))>
set [j v] to ((i) * (i))
if <(item (i) of [a v]) = (1)> then
repeat until <(j) > ((n) * (n))>
replace item (j) of [a v] with (0)
change [j v] by (1)
end
end
change [i v] by (1)

SavetheAtlantic wrote:

Horizontal blocks are practically unusable for anything more than a few dozen blocks. I don't see the point of wasting time making something that is worse and harder to use with no real benefit besides “it looks cool”.Try writing this basic script in horizontal blocks:

repeat until <(i) > ((n) * (n))>
set [j v] to ((i) * (i))
if <(item (i) of [a v]) = (1)> then
repeat until <(j) > ((n) * (n))>
replace item (j) of [a v] with (0)
change [j v] by (1)
end
end
change [i v] by (1)

TopGG wrote:

SavetheAtlantic wrote:

Horizontal blocks are practically unusable for anything more than a few dozen blocks. I don't see the point of wasting time making something that is worse and harder to use with no real benefit besides “it looks cool”.Try writing this basic script in horizontal blocks:

repeat until <(i) > ((n) * (n))>
set [j v] to ((i) * (i))
if <(item (i) of [a v]) = (1)> then
repeat until <(j) > ((n) * (n))>
replace item (j) of [a v] with (0)
change [j v] by (1)
end
end
change [i v] by (1)

Hey.

Please read through this post I made, as it doesn't seem like you have all the information.

That reminds me, OP can you please add the info from that post into the first post as “pros”?