monkeytrooper wrote:

I will not register your proposition until it is clear. You want to get rid of judges? If so, that could be the next proposal.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

Self explanatory; get rid of judges because it's another unnecessary position.

Austinato wrote:

Judges would be needed to reach a verdict or decision that does not require the public, such as rule breaking and whether or not the person shall be punished, etc.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

Official Law Propositions
Link to #1-2, 3, 4
#1 - Stronger Moderation on Shop Statuses (proposed by monkeytrooper, approved November 13, 2016)
#2 - Law Opposition & Vote (proposed by Austinato, automatic approval through owner)
#3 - Shop Invitation (proposed by Austinato, awaiting approval with two days left)
#4 - Get rid of Judges (proposed by monkeytrooper, awaiting approval with one opposal, three days left)

Austinato wrote:

Austinato wrote:

monkeytrooper wrote:

I will not register your proposition until it is clear. You want to get rid of judges? If so, that could be the next proposal.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

I do

Alright, Proposal #4.

Proposition #4 - Get Rid of Judges

Self explanatory; get rid of judges because it's another unnecessary position.

You have three days to oppose to this proposition. If three or more people oppose the suggestion, then an automatic vote shall occur. If two or less people oppose, then the proposition will be enacted immediately on November 17, 2016.

By immediate reaction, I oppose this proposition as per the post before:

Austinato wrote:

Judges would be needed to reach a verdict or decision that does not require the public, such as rule breaking and whether or not the person shall be punished, etc.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

But that does not mean this proposition is officially going to reach a post. That means the proposition requires two more official oppositions before it results in an official vote.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

Bright-Idea wrote:

Austinato wrote:

Proposition #4 - Get Rid of Judges

Self explanatory; get rid of judges because it's another unnecessary position.

You have three days to oppose to this proposition. If three or more people oppose the suggestion, then an automatic vote shall occur. If two or less people oppose, then the proposition will be enacted immediately on November 17, 2016.

By immediate reaction, I oppose this proposition as per the post before:

Austinato wrote:

Judges would be needed to reach a verdict or decision that does not require the public, such as rule breaking and whether or not the person shall be punished, etc.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

I object to that proposal for the same reason as Austinato.

Austinato wrote:

Bright-Idea wrote:

Austinato wrote:

Proposition #4 - Get Rid of Judges

Self explanatory; get rid of judges because it's another unnecessary position.

You have three days to oppose to this proposition. If three or more people oppose the suggestion, then an automatic vote shall occur. If two or less people oppose, then the proposition will be enacted immediately on November 17, 2016.

By immediate reaction, I oppose this proposition as per the post before:

Austinato wrote:

Judges would be needed to reach a verdict or decision that does not require the public, such as rule breaking and whether or not the person shall be punished, etc.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

I object to that proposal for the same reason as Austinato.

Alright, that would mean one more opposition would automatically call on a vote which decides it's final verdict.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

Law Registration/Enactment
In order for someone to propose a law, they must be a member of the USS, meaning they must be a shop owner or a member of the shop itself. The law may be approved or declined, but if there is not two or more declines by three days after the proposed law has been originally posted, the law is enacted.

If two or more people decline, an automatic vote shall occur for three days, and the declination deadline shall be postponed, and the result of the election shall be the decision on whether or not the vote is enacted.

Austinato wrote:

Proposition #4 - Get Rid of Judges

Self explanatory; get rid of judges because it's another unnecessary position.

YES - 1
NO - 3
NOT SURE - 1

Austinato wrote:

Proposal 4 Official Vote

I regret to inform you all that the first vote on approving a proposal has been enacted through Proposal 2's new rule:

Law Registration/Enactment
In order for someone to propose a law, they must be a member of the USS, meaning they must be a shop owner or a member of the shop itself. The law may be approved or declined, but if there is not two or more declines by three days after the proposed law has been originally posted, the law is enacted.

If two or more people decline, an automatic vote shall occur for three days, and the declination deadline shall be postponed, and the result of the election shall be the decision on whether or not the vote is enacted.

That means a vote has been called on for Proposition #4, by monkeytrooper requesting that this federation removes the role of justices altogether. You may view the proposal here:

Austinato wrote:

Proposition #4 - Get Rid of Judges

Self explanatory; get rid of judges because it's another unnecessary position.

Votes are not between us four (monkeytrooper, Bright-Idea, myself, and TacoCatProductions), you may recruit your own shop members to voice their opinion, however they must post their opinion or vote here. There is no law preventing anyone from suddenly joining our federation because of this vote.

Vote Choices
YES, keep the justice position because I find it necessary.
NO, remove the justice position because I find it unnecessary.
NOT SURE, I do not wish to voice my opinion and remain neutral. My vote will not be counted between either side.

Vote Results

YES - 1
NO - 3
NOT SURE - 0

Those who have opposed this proposition have automatically been placed under NO. You may swap views, but that will not prevent this election from continuing.

This vote shall conclude on November 17, 2016, or when every single member (19) of all USS shops vote.

Thanks for reading and the vote shall begin,
Austinato

QuantumSingularity wrote:

Is it possible fore me to apply for Secretary? Do you guys do “applys” or are you going to wait a while until more people show up.

monkeytrooper wrote:

QuantumSingularity wrote:

Is it possible fore me to apply for Secretary? Do you guys do “applys” or are you going to wait a while until more people show up.

You can write a small application about your qualifications (on scratch) why you would be good, an ecample of your work and so on.

MT

QuantumSingularity wrote:

I vote Not Sure. Although I wish to become active in the USS community, and shall eventually, I cannot take a side. I VOTE NEUTRAL.

I'm part of TacoCatProductions.

QuantumSingularity wrote:

Is it possible fore me to apply for Secretary? Do you guys do “applys” or are you going to wait a while until more people show up.

Austinato wrote:

Proposition #3 - Shop Invitation

Once a month, we vote on shops that we should invite into the United Shops of Scratch. This would mean each person could opt to suggest two to three shops that should join the federation, and then the top three we would invite (yes, it will expand in the event of a tie) by posting on their official topics.

You have three days to oppose to this proposition. If three or more people oppose the suggestion, then an automatic vote shall occur. If two or less people oppose, then the proposition will be enacted immediately on November 16, 2016.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

YES - 1 (20%)
NO - 3 (60%)
NOT SURE - 1 (20%)

Austinato wrote:

Austinato wrote:

Proposition #3 - Shop Invitation

Once a month, we vote on shops that we should invite into the United Shops of Scratch. This would mean each person could opt to suggest two to three shops that should join the federation, and then the top three we would invite (yes, it will expand in the event of a tie) by posting on their official topics.

You have three days to oppose to this proposition. If three or more people oppose the suggestion, then an automatic vote shall occur. If two or less people oppose, then the proposition will be enacted immediately on November 16, 2016.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

During the vote, this suggestion has one more day (or practically 8 hours according to EDT timezone) until this suggestion is successfully enacted.

YES - 1 (20%)
NO - 3 (60%)
NOT SURE - 1 (20%)

This is what voting currently looks like. There are two more days left for voting.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

TacoCatProuductions wrote:

Austinato wrote:

Proposal 4 Official Vote

I regret to inform you all that the first vote on approving a proposal has been enacted through Proposal 2's new rule:

Law Registration/Enactment
In order for someone to propose a law, they must be a member of the USS, meaning they must be a shop owner or a member of the shop itself. The law may be approved or declined, but if there is not two or more declines by three days after the proposed law has been originally posted, the law is enacted.

If two or more people decline, an automatic vote shall occur for three days, and the declination deadline shall be postponed, and the result of the election shall be the decision on whether or not the vote is enacted.

That means a vote has been called on for Proposition #4, by monkeytrooper requesting that this federation removes the role of justices altogether. You may view the proposal here:

Austinato wrote:

Proposition #4 - Get Rid of Judges

Self explanatory; get rid of judges because it's another unnecessary position.

Votes are not between us four (monkeytrooper, Bright-Idea, myself, and TacoCatProductions), you may recruit your own shop members to voice their opinion, however they must post their opinion or vote here. There is no law preventing anyone from suddenly joining our federation because of this vote.

Vote Choices
YES, keep the justice position because I find it necessary.
NO, remove the justice position because I find it unnecessary.
NOT SURE, I do not wish to voice my opinion and remain neutral. My vote will not be counted between either side.

Vote Results

YES - 1
NO - 3
NOT SURE - 0

Those who have opposed this proposition have automatically been placed under NO. You may swap views, but that will not prevent this election from continuing.

This vote shall conclude on November 17, 2016, or when every single member (19) of all USS shops vote.

Thanks for reading and the vote shall begin,
Austinato

Time to recruit

TeamBetas wrote:

TacoCatProuductions wrote:

Austinato wrote:

Proposal 4 Official Vote

I regret to inform you all that the first vote on approving a proposal has been enacted through Proposal 2's new rule:

Law Registration/Enactment
In order for someone to propose a law, they must be a member of the USS, meaning they must be a shop owner or a member of the shop itself. The law may be approved or declined, but if there is not two or more declines by three days after the proposed law has been originally posted, the law is enacted.

If two or more people decline, an automatic vote shall occur for three days, and the declination deadline shall be postponed, and the result of the election shall be the decision on whether or not the vote is enacted.

That means a vote has been called on for Proposition #4, by monkeytrooper requesting that this federation removes the role of justices altogether. You may view the proposal here:

Austinato wrote:

Proposition #4 - Get Rid of Judges

Self explanatory; get rid of judges because it's another unnecessary position.

Votes are not between us four (monkeytrooper, Bright-Idea, myself, and TacoCatProductions), you may recruit your own shop members to voice their opinion, however they must post their opinion or vote here. There is no law preventing anyone from suddenly joining our federation because of this vote.

Vote Choices
YES, keep the justice position because I find it necessary.
NO, remove the justice position because I find it unnecessary.
NOT SURE, I do not wish to voice my opinion and remain neutral. My vote will not be counted between either side.

Vote Results

YES - 1
NO - 3
NOT SURE - 0

Those who have opposed this proposition have automatically been placed under NO. You may swap views, but that will not prevent this election from continuing.

This vote shall conclude on November 17, 2016, or when every single member (19) of all USS shops vote.

Thanks for reading and the vote shall begin,
Austinato

Time to recruit

No -Rep for Tacocatprouductions magical market

TacoCatProuductions wrote:

update your sig

TeamBetas wrote:

No -Rep for Tacocatprouductions magical market

Austinato wrote:

TacoCatProuductions wrote:

update your sig

I plan on updating it after a “day” of voting, rather than as soon as someone votes.
(In about an hour I'll update it.)

TeamBetas wrote:

No -Rep for Tacocatprouductions magical market

Added.

Thanks for reading,
Austinato

NDSDNS wrote:

I vote no