The Official List of Rejected Suggestions

EllaFastGard20

M1mikyu wrote:
EllaFastGard20 wrote:
M1mikyu wrote:
Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
Za-Chary wrote:
DaniilSat66799 wrote:
BAN PASS(ALLOWS YOU TO PREVENT A BAN) 10000 SCRATCHIONS)
No.
And please don't speak in entirely capital letters; that's considered yelling, and is impolite.
Unless you're trying to express enthusiasm, such as “OMG I FINALLY BEAT THE ENDER DRAGON!”
What do you mean??

Caps lock can be used to express happiness or excitement. I was simply explaining a situation where caps lock would be okay.
Oh, kay.

Hi!! I'm EllaFastGard20 but call me Ella,
my brother is IWILLBE23 he call him Will.
And yes you can call me ella with lower case e.
I almost have 200 followers!

And I do NOT know how to make animations

when green flag clicked
if <[Know how to make animations?] = [No]> then
set [Emotion] to [Sad and neutral]
else
set [Emotion] to [Happy and neutral]
end

HELLO

JPOWERPUFFGIRLS

EllaFastGard20 wrote:
M1mikyu wrote:
EllaFastGard20 wrote:
M1mikyu wrote:
Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
Za-Chary wrote:
DaniilSat66799 wrote:
BAN PASS(ALLOWS YOU TO PREVENT A BAN) 10000 SCRATCHIONS)
snip

I think this is getting offtopic

Super_Scratch_Bros20

anonymous8453 wrote:
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/446727660/

DaniilSat66799 wrote:
NO SIRIUSLY DUDE WE SHOULD REALLY HAVE THAT DIGITAL CURRENCY!!!
LETS CALL IT “SCRATCHIONS” AND MAKE PEOPLE EARN THEM FOR EXAMPLE:
10 SCRATCHIONS FOR A COMMENT ON YOUR PROJECT/PROFILE
20 FOR A LIKE OR FAV
50 FOR A FOLLOW
100 FOR GETTING FEATURED
1000 FOR GETTING ON TRENDING
100000 FOR BEING FPC

SHOP

BAN PASS(ALLOWS YOU TO PREVENT A BAN) 10000 SCRATCHIONS)
NO SIXTY SECOND RULE FOR A WEEK:1000 SCRATCHIONS
FREE SCRATCH WIKI ACCOUNT:10000 SCRATCHIONS
FREE STUDIO FEATURE:100000 SCRATCHIONS
NO MESSAGE AFTER POSTING SAME COMMENT SEVERAL TIMES FOR A WEEK:1000 SCRATCHIONS
when green flag clicked
forever
imagine
program
share
earn
spend
end

I didn't know that this sticky just became the new Spam Cult. Come on, let's go ahead and stick to the topic.

I don't think that the suggestion about removing the eggplant emoji should be on the list anymore. It was a suggestion from a while ago, and no one suggests it anymore. It was removed a very long time ago, and I don't think anyone even cares about it anymore.

Last edited by Super_Scratch_Bros20 (Nov. 10, 2020 13:29:18)

PhoenixCoderBessie

Workaround for the go to x y z block:

define go to x(x)y(y)z(z)
go to x: ((x) / (z)) y: ((y) / (z))

(Highlight, then press ctrl+shift+down arrow to see the rest of my siggy.

when [a scratcher v] posts a comment :: operators hat
if <<he advertised?::sensing> or <it wasn't approopreiate::motion>> then
repeat until <he understands::sound>
report [the scracher v]::list
end
forever
[hate and ingnore v] him [forever v]
end

Super_Scratch_Bros20

PhoenixCoderBessie wrote:
Workaround for the go to x y z block:
define go to x(x)y(y)z(z)
go to x: ((x) / (z)) y: ((y) / (z))

It would do you good if you discussed workarounds in the workaround sticky. However, this does not work, because there is no “z” in a 2D Scratch.

fdreerf

Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
PhoenixCoderBessie wrote:
Workaround for the go to x y z block:
define go to x(x)y(y)z(z)
go to x: ((x) / (z)) y: ((y) / (z))
However, this does not work, because there is no “z” in a 2D Scratch.

What do you think the custom block is for?

Hyped for MS-DOS 11.0

-0Nebula0-

fdreerf wrote:
Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
PhoenixCoderBessie wrote:
Workaround for the go to x y z block:
define go to x(x)y(y)z(z)
go to x: ((x) / (z)) y: ((y) / (z))
However, this does not work, because there is no “z” in a 2D Scratch.
What do you think the custom block is for?

It doesnt work because it is physically impossible to have a 3d coordinate in a 2d editor

hi!
Shadowstar757 is my other, old account, i'm more active there now

fdreerf

-0Nebula0- wrote:
It doesnt work because it is physically impossible to have a 3d coordinate in a 2d editor

Your screen is 2D and it can display 3D images just fine. How do you think 3D scratch projects are made? It doesn't work because there's no Z-axis, it doesn't work because that's not how the Z-axis can be replicated.

Hyped for MS-DOS 11.0

Super_Scratch_Bros20

fdreerf wrote:
Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
PhoenixCoderBessie wrote:
Workaround for the go to x y z block:
define go to x(x)y(y)z(z)
go to x: ((x) / (z)) y: ((y) / (z))
However, this does not work, because there is no “z” in a 2D Scratch.
What do you think the custom block is for?

It requires more coding beyond this script to make a 3D Scratch, therefore this is not the only key to the workaround.

Let's finish this discussion in the workaround topic, shall we?

IWILLBE23

No

when stop clicked :: hat events

Last edited by IWILLBE23 (Nov. 10, 2020 19:57:03)

Dead link

if <are stupid> then
switch costume to [Dumb v]
end

-0Nebula0-

IWILLBE23 wrote:
No
when stop clicked :: hat events

-_-

hi!
Shadowstar757 is my other, old account, i'm more active there now

RobotChickens

Are these blocks rejected?

<@greenFlag clicked?::sensing>
When @greenFlag clicked? = [false v]::events hat

When @greenFlag clicked? = [true v]::events hat

Replying to SPAM is only adding more off-topic SPAM. Just report it.

✊ Support the suggestion HERE by adding this button to your signature ✊

Get cool forum emojis HERE

Google Noto Emoji is superior as you can see

;

-0Nebula0-

RobotChickens wrote:

Are these blocks rejected?

<@greenFlag clicked?::sensing>
When @greenFlag clicked? = [false v]::events hat

When @greenFlag clicked? = [true v]::events hat

yes

hi!
Shadowstar757 is my other, old account, i'm more active there now

Super_Scratch_Bros20

RobotChickens wrote:

Are these blocks rejected?

<@greenFlag clicked?::sensing>
When @greenFlag clicked? = [false v]::events hat

When @greenFlag clicked? = [true v]::events hat

No…. but there is no way of the boolean being able to work because the green flag would have to be clicked for it to work.

There is also not too much of a purpose in the green flag clicked event hat. It is exactly the same as “when green flag clicked”. I don't see why you'd have a block for when the green flag isn't being clicked… It would just run the project, whereas clicking the green flag just starts it up.

p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-

RobotChickens wrote:

Are these blocks rejected?

<@greenFlag clicked?::sensing>
When gf clicked? = [false v]::events hat

When gf clicked? = [true v]::events hat

They aren't rejected, they just wouldn't work, because the project scripts don't work unless the green flag is clicked.

New!

Super_Scratch_Bros20

p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p- wrote:
RobotChickens wrote:
Are these blocks rejected?
<@greenFlag clicked?::sensing>
When gf clicked? = [false v]::events hat

When gf clicked? = [true v]::events hat
They aren't rejected, they just wouldn't work, because the project scripts don't work unless the green flag is clicked.

Well, the event hats would, since they require their own events for it to work.

Last edited by Super_Scratch_Bros20 (Nov. 10, 2020 20:55:09)

-0Nebula0-

They aren't rejected, they just wouldn't work, because the project scripts don't work unless the green flag is clicked.
Scripts dont NEED the flag to get clicked to work, like

when this sprite clicked
example :: #ff8379

hi!
Shadowstar757 is my other, old account, i'm more active there now

Za-Chary

RobotChickens wrote:

Are these blocks rejected?

<@greenFlag clicked?::sensing>
When @greenFlag clicked? = [false v]::events hat

When @greenFlag clicked? = [true v]::events hat

I'm just going to stop the discussion here and confirm that yes, although the definitions are somewhat ambiguous, they are not explicitly rejected. Feel free to make your own topic suggesting them.

This is my forum signature! On a forum post, it is okay for Scratchers to advertise in their forum signature. The signature is the stuff that shows up below the horizontal line on the post. It will show up on every post I make.

I was a Scratch Team member from May 10th 2019 to October 29th 2021.

my notebook | scratch team essay | accessibility essay

spocite

Za-Chary wrote:
RobotChickens wrote:
Are these blocks rejected?
<@greenFlag clicked?::sensing>
When @greenFlag clicked? = [false v]::events hat

When @greenFlag clicked? = [true v]::events hat
I'm just going to stop the discussion here and confirm that yes, although the definitions are somewhat ambiguous, they are not explicitly rejected. Feel free to make your own topic suggesting them.

good idea.

if you read this, thanks!
-spocite / posty / alien / the one who is going to take over the world someday (:<

why are all my posts in the suggestions forum

spocite wrote:
the real bruh moment was the friends we made along the way

a normal user can’t read this far, but you can! here's a free cake! tell me you got it on my profile!

IndianRuby718

So, about suggestion 9.2, notifications when you get quoted. at the end it says “If you want to stay updated on a certain topic, you can always follow the topic and get notified on new posts that are made.” But this isn't the main reason this suggestion should be implemented.

IndianRuby718 wrote:
If for example someone posts “support” on a topic and leaves, then someone else quotes them and says “please say why you support”, the first person is never going to see that, because they aren't following the discussion.

The person being quoted probably has no reason to follow the topic if they came over for a simple “support” and leaves.

IndianRuby718 wrote:
[M]y example above [snip] is a very good reason for adding it that hasn't been mentioned. Also, [if it only counts direct quoting, and] if you only get one message no matter how many times someone quotes you up until you view the message, like for normal forum posts, then it can't be abused any more than the regular forums can, right? All the extra quoting would take up that whitespace, but there's no use from it, so the spammers would just stop…

But you could still be spammed if someone has quoted you each time you look at your messages. So I'm not asking to remove this from the rejected list, because I see the problems. I just want to see the above addressed in the reasons why it was rejected. [I also have two ideas to replace this suggestion, and I will make two topics about them, but I want to see what happens with this post first.]
If you want to know where I posted this, it's on here… but my post there was very long XD
Post 102…

So… I didn't update my signature for over a year XP But… I left the forums, and I'm not coming back anytime soon
(and I'm not updating my signature)

Both stickied Suggestions Directories currently have 138 replies.
Only fdreerf can break the equilibrium.

________________

Za-chary wrote:
I get more frustrated with people telling me about “mass reporting” than I do about “mass reporting” itself.

source
good luck digging up the original reply in the comments
ctrl+f exists

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/6961734/

Bug with the color effect I would really like to see fixed

EEEEEEE   DDDDDD    IIIIIIII  TTTTTTTT           NNN    NN     OOOOO
EE        DD    DD     II        TT     ::       NNNN   NN   OO     OO
EEEEEEE   DD    DD     II        TT              NN NN  NN   OO     OO 
EE        DD    DD     II        TT     ::       NN  NN NN   OO     OO
EE        DD    DD     II        TT              NN   NNNN   OO     OO
EEEEEEE   DDDDDD    IIIIIIII     TT              NN    NNN     OOOOO

Hand-done.

< :: extension>
< :: custom-arg>
< :: motion>

Don't click this link…

Discuss Scratch