Cub56 wrote:

I won't support, since followers don't directly translate to views. Many people have inactive followers and most of a project's views actually don't come from followers.

I do agree that people with fewer followers need more recognition, and the way to fix that is to change the search engine to not prioritise the most popular projects.

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Cub56 wrote:

I won't support, since followers don't directly translate to views. Many people have inactive followers and most of a project's views actually don't come from followers.

I do agree that people with fewer followers need more recognition, and the way to fix that is to change the search engine to not prioritise the most popular projects.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Cub56 wrote:

I won't support, since followers don't directly translate to views. Many people have inactive followers and most of a project's views actually don't come from followers.

I do agree that people with fewer followers need more recognition, and the way to fix that is to change the search engine to not prioritise the most popular projects.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Why do people keep on saying the some points a already discredited over and over again?

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Cub56 wrote:

I won't support, since followers don't directly translate to views. Many people have inactive followers and most of a project's views actually don't come from followers.

I do agree that people with fewer followers need more recognition, and the way to fix that is to change the search engine to not prioritise the most popular projects.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Why do people keep on saying the some points a already discredited over and over again?

Because we can It is not against the rules.

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Cub56 wrote:

I won't support, since followers don't directly translate to views. Many people have inactive followers and most of a project's views actually don't come from followers.

I do agree that people with fewer followers need more recognition, and the way to fix that is to change the search engine to not prioritise the most popular projects.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Why do people keep on saying the some points a already discredited over and over again?

Because we can It is not against the rules.

I never said that it was against they rules. I just said that it doesn’t make sense.

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Cub56 wrote:

-snip-

-snip-

Why do people keep on saying the some points a already discredited over and over again?

Because we can It is not against the rules.

I never said that it was against they rules. I just said that it doesn’t make sense.

Well we can, because we aren't gonna waste time making our own explanations, when other people already did.

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Cub56 wrote:

-snip-

-snip-

Why do people keep on saying the some points a already discredited over and over again?

Because we can It is not against the rules.

I never said that it was against they rules. I just said that it doesn’t make sense.

Well we can, because we aren't gonna waste time making our own explanations, when other people already did.

Even though I already discredited those explanations?

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Cub56 wrote:

I won't support, since followers don't directly translate to views. Many people have inactive followers and most of a project's views actually don't come from followers.

I do agree that people with fewer followers need more recognition, and the way to fix that is to change the search engine to not prioritise the most popular projects.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Why do people keep on saying the some points a already discredited over and over again?

Because we can It is not against the rules.

Sigton wrote:

Fifth Suggestion:
(Thanks to alexphan)

Don't simply quote somebody, or do ^^^, or “As per this”, or any other alias you can find. It is just copying what the person before said before, and saying the same thing twice isn't going to help the discussion nor the idea. Try to add your own, original idea to make it a better idea!

Sheep_maker wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

calulord wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Cub56 wrote:

I won't support, since followers don't directly translate to views. Many people have inactive followers and most of a project's views actually don't come from followers.

I do agree that people with fewer followers need more recognition, and the way to fix that is to change the search engine to not prioritise the most popular projects.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Why do people keep on saying the some points a already discredited over and over again?

Because we can It is not against the rules.

It's not constructive; please read the stickies before posting:

Sigton wrote:

Fifth Suggestion:
(Thanks to alexphan)

Don't simply quote somebody, or do ^^^, or “As per this”, or any other alias you can find. It is just copying what the person before said before, and saying the same thing twice isn't going to help the discussion nor the idea. Try to add your own, original idea to make it a better idea!

I have nothing to add, as most of the points regarding this suggestion have already been brought up before.

calulord wrote:

b u m p

calulord wrote:

bump

calulord wrote:

BUMP

calulord wrote:

bump bump bump

Xavuz wrote:

The people with more followers have earned their followers and have a right to get their hard earned loves. If the the person with less followers keeps making quality projects they will get more followers and have chance. They just need to be patient. I do not think they should change the way it works.

calulord wrote:

Xavuz wrote:

The people with more followers have earned their followers and have a right to get their hard earned loves. If the the person with less followers keeps making quality projects they will get more followers and have chance. They just need to be patient. I do not think they should change the way it works.

So apparently people with who have gotten followers should have an better chance of getting top loved just becuase they have gotten more followers and not the quality of the actual projects themselves.