DaEpikDude wrote:

XayCraft360 wrote:

Also, i noticed a typo in #11, you said TGB, while it's supposed to be TBG

What are you talking about the Text Games Based forums are my favourite forums

XayCraft360 wrote:

New rejected suggestion, found Here

I think it is about banning art stealing

Delete User [Jacobwworkman]

LogOff User [Jacobwworkman]

Jacobwworkman wrote:

Delete User [Jacobwworkman]

LogOff User [Jacobwworkman]

These need to be added on here too…. u might know why…

Jacobwworkman wrote:

Delete User [Jacobwworkman]

LogOff User [Jacobwworkman]

These need to be added on here too…. u might know why…

Za-Chary wrote:

Jacobwworkman wrote:

Delete User [Jacobwworkman]

LogOff User [Jacobwworkman]

These need to be added on here too…. u might know why…

This list isn't exactly for features that could go wrong (and there is plenty of reason as to why the Scratch Team would not want to add these blocks), but features that go in this list are generally suggested multiple times by people, and explained by a Scratch Team member why the suggestion cannot exist on Scratch.

Za-Chary wrote:

I truthfully don't know what this is suggesting, but it seems to be rejected anyway: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/323497/?page=1#post-3337885

Paddle2See wrote:

He is suggesting that Scratch provide a way to generate executable files that could be run on other devices, such as a smartphone (his example). I generalized it a bit to include all “black box” executables, where you can run the program but not see the scripts that make it run. It isn't something that matches well with our goals for Scratch.

35: Showing exact post count of other users:

Paddle2See wrote:

The reason that post counts were made “fuzzy” in the first place was to de-emphasize the importance attached to the post count - to prevent spamming for post count. We don't want people focusing on “the numbers” - but rather working to make quality posts that encourage meaningful communication. I see no real benefit from making it easier to see the exact number.

thisandagain wrote:

We are not considering a “skin” that switches between the look of 2.0 and 3.0, but we may consider being able to toggle which side of the screen the stage is on.

Galaxia_TheWolf684 wrote:

Is it possible for YOU to see YOUR exact post count, though? And, if yes, how?

Za-Chary wrote:

This doesn't quite deserve to go in the list, but is “switch the stage to the left in Scratch 3.0” rejected?

@thisandagain commented this on his profile a day or two ago:

thisandagain wrote:

We are not considering a “skin” that switches between the look of 2.0 and 3.0, but we may consider being able to toggle which side of the screen the stage is on.

I ask because a lot of people are saying that switching the side the stage is on is “rejected”. Is there any instance of a Scratch Team member saying this?

StarlightJenna wrote:

I get this, but Item 9 doesn't seem fair. If no one else could see the rewards, then why would you say no? It could be like a challenge to help a user learn. Right?

Za-Chary wrote:

New rejected suggestion (?): “Stop Scratch 3.0”
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/325170/

I suppose this is self-explanatory and doesn't really deserve to go on the list, especially since 3.0 comes out in 2 weeks, but eh.

Za-Chary wrote:

Should “nicknames” be added to the list, or is that too similar to changing your username?

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/320919/?page=3#post-3355466

LionHeart70 wrote:

PLEASE NOTE: A lot of this is copied from the old topics.
I know that a topic like this already exists, but it has become very inactive recently and is also fairly incomplete.


33: Banning certain franchises:
The Scratch Team will not ban any franchise as a whole unless said franchise contains shockingly inappropriate content and little to no clean content, and would be virtually impossible to make anything appropriate out of it. The reason that certain franchises such as FNAF have some restrictions is because they are very popular and had many inappropriate projects made about them (see number 17), however this is a fairly rare scenario and there's no need to do it with most franchises unless they suddenly become very popular on the site with many inappropriate projects about them coming in too.

Paddle explains it better than me, though:

Paddle2See wrote:

As with so many of these “Ban some game or movie” suggestions, we feel that it is possible to make Scratch projects that are appropriate for Scratch with the material. Also, we have not had a large number of inappropriate projects based around Star Wars.

Please use the Report button on projects that you feel are not okay for Scratch - but we don't see a need to put specific restrictions on Star Wars based projects at this time.

)