The Suggestion:
I think we should be able to see if a project has been marked NFE, FE, or Unreviewed.

For those who don't know: When a Scratch Team member reviews a project, they will either mark it as ‘FE’ (For Everyone, meaning the project has no restrictions placed on it) or ‘NFE’. (Not For Everyone, meaning the project cannot appear on the front page) For more information, see here: http://wiki.scratch.mit.edu/wiki/NFE#Not_For_Everyone

Reasons:
This would be good because:

1. If you're waiting for your project to be placed on the front page (top-loved, top-remixed, etc.) you will know ahead of time if your project is aloud. By the time Scratchers figure out it was marked NFE, fix why it was marked NFE, get a ST member to remove the NFE status, the time it should've been on the Front Page will most likely be gone.
   
2. I have seen loads of comments from FPC's on ST's profiles saying “Why wont this project go on the front page?” It's normally because its marked NFE. They now have to explain to the project creator that even though they said they would curate it, they can't because its marked NFE. A ‘Project Status Bar’ would let them know ahead of time if it is NFE.
   
3. You don't have to leave a comment on an ST's profile asking if your project is NFE or FE anymore.
   

Demonstration:
Here's what a project marked NFE would look like:

Obviously, this is a rough drawing and would look loads better than this. Also, when you hover your mouse over the ‘Status’, a small bar will pop up saying "This project was marked Not For Everyone. (NFE) This means it can not appear on the Front Page. For more information, please see here: http://wiki.scratch.mit.edu/wiki/NFE#Not_For_Everyone. If you think this project was wrongly marked, please send a message to https://scratch.mit.edu/contact-us/."

Supporters:
The following people support this suggestion:

1. St19_Galla
   
2. DaSpudLord
   
3. scrooge200
   
4. TheHockeyist
   
5. Cream_E_Cookie
   
6. Deerleg
   
7. Vyuss
   
8. Rollercoasterfan
   
9. -SuperScratch-
   
10. Hamish753
    
11. applesauceepicness
    
12. crimson19
    
13. Co49
    
14. fmtfmtfmt2
    
15. coolgem923
    
16. shaymin88
    
17. skelepound
    
18. Nether_before
    
19. letsgopitt
    
20. Samanyolu
    
21. Medley7
    
22. Znapi
    
23. IronBit_Studios
    

Conclusion:
If you have any questions, please ask! Also, if you do not support, please say why :D

If there is a topic similar to this, please let me know and I will have this closed! I looked, but I could not find any.

Support.

U^ｪ^U::motion//This is Blocky. He lives in my signature. He is a trained attack block. He protects my siggy from kumquats.

Support.

DaSpudLord wrote:

Support.

scrooge200 wrote:

Support.

Thanks!

Chibi-Matoran wrote:

Duplicate.

No, not a duplicate. That is a suggestion to tell the user of the project in the form of a message from the ST. Not a Status Bar saying what the status of the project is, available to see on the project, and for everyone to see.

st19_galla wrote:

Chibi-Matoran wrote:

Duplicate.

No, not a duplicate. That is a suggestion to tell the user of the project in the form of a message from the ST. Not a Status Bar saying what the status of the project is, available to see on the project, and for everyone to see.

I remember I saw a topic like yours somewhere… I'll try to find it.

Edit: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/52602/

Chibi-Matoran wrote:

st19_galla wrote:

Chibi-Matoran wrote:

Duplicate.

No, not a duplicate. That is a suggestion to tell the user of the project in the form of a message from the ST. Not a Status Bar saying what the status of the project is, available to see on the project, and for everyone to see.

I remember I saw a topic like yours somewhere… I'll try to find it.

Edit: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/52602/

That is still a bit different It shows a warning message upon starting the project, I do not want that, and that would not work anyway, as animated thumbnails are marked NFE but they don't have any disturbing content. xD Also, that was made back in 2014, I feel that if TheHockeyist still wanted the idea in place, they would bump it

TheHockeyist wrote:

Support.

(And by the way, I closed it because it was old. I can report to reopen it if you wish.)

No, that's fine Yours was a bit different anyway xD Thanks for supporting!

st19_galla wrote:

TheHockeyist wrote:

Support.

(And by the way, I closed it because it was old. I can report to reopen it if you wish.)

No, that's fine Yours was a bit different anyway xD Thanks for supporting!

Ah, no prob. Just let me know if you want it reopened.

TheHockeyist wrote:

st19_galla wrote:

TheHockeyist wrote:

Support.

(And by the way, I closed it because it was old. I can report to reopen it if you wish.)

No, that's fine Yours was a bit different anyway xD Thanks for supporting!

Ah, no prob. Just let me know if you want it reopened.

Okay!

support

Cream_E_Cookie wrote:

support

Thanks!

Support!

Deerleg wrote:

Support!

Yay!

Total support!

Vyuss wrote:

Total support!

Great!

Oh, support to the max.

when [chromometer altimeter v] = [5th length v] and [7th length v] with a [gap v] of (17) ::events hat
forge [chromometer v] altimeter until < (speed) = (velocity)> ::control cstart
	switch places with (759 v) altimeters with value of (speed) ::looks
	control [altimeter 1 v] at time (10):(17):(58) ::control
end
initialize sequence (24) so [object 3 v] moves to x (156) y (231) ::control
reveal [final answer v] and stop running this script ::events cap

rollercoasterfan wrote:

Oh, support to the max.

Added you to supporters list

Support☺My browser / operating system: Android Linux 5.0.2, Chrome 44.0.2403.133, No Flash version detected
Wait wut I'm on a computer AHHHHH