Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » "Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
- CGRises
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*
I
am childcritic
no longer forumposting
but still on on here
@speedyturtle has correctly guessed that the poem is a haiku.
AMV contest
- scratchinghead
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*
Last edited by kaj (Today 18:04:22)
- 20btheilmanngohr
- Scratcher
100+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
Two questions:
A. Are there preset fonts similar to costumes?
B. Would this act like a typewriter, in the sense that it pastes words?
A. Are there preset fonts similar to costumes?
B. Would this act like a typewriter, in the sense that it pastes words?
- CGRises
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this shouldn't be implemented. I am trying to say new scratchers wound be confused.So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*
I
am childcritic
no longer forumposting
but still on on here
@speedyturtle has correctly guessed that the poem is a haiku.
AMV contest
- scratchinghead
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
So they may get confused by this:So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this shouldn't be implemented. I am trying to say new scratchers wound be confused.So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*
([sin v] of (9))A lots of people don't understand what it is, but that block is still exist.
Last edited by kaj (Today 18:04:22)
- CGRises
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
I don't even know what that does, but I don't use it either.So they may get confused by this:So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this shouldn't be implemented. I am trying to say new scratchers wound be confused.So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*([sin v] of (9))A lots of people don't understand what it is, but that block is still exist.
I
am childcritic
no longer forumposting
but still on on here
@speedyturtle has correctly guessed that the poem is a haiku.
AMV contest
- IronBit_Studios
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
Therefore, new users don't have to use it.I don't even know what that does, but I don't use it either.So they may get confused by this:So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this shouldn't be implemented. I am trying to say new scratchers wound be confused.So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*([sin v] of (9))A lots of people don't understand what it is, but that block is still exist.
- NoMod-Programming
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
No support I was thinking that Scratch should have a “Print” function:print [] :: penIt would work as it does in other languages, printing the input.
There would also be related blocks to support it:newline :: pen
set print font to [ v] :: pen
set print size to ( v) :: pen
set print colour to [#ff0000] :: pen
set print boldness to ( v) :: pen // I forgot this block. 0 is super light, 100 is super thick.
print [] to x:() y:() :: pen // Suggested by Pot-Of-Gold and Samanyolu
set print [ v] effect to () :: pen
change print [ v] effect by () :: pen // Blocks suggested by SamanyoluCurrent Supporters
IronBit_Studios
Pot-Of-Gold
thelucariokid
CosmicStars-
rollercoasterfan
Eastu
duckboycool
thecontestmagic
MushroomMan99
Purplebook163
wayyyy
Rumanti
Molotov_Peep
ev3coolexit987654
Samanyolu
Tymewalk
TheHockeyist
EmeraldSapphire41
HardClaw57
NickTheNinja25
Cream_E_Cookie
CodingKyle123
Zarlog
Sheepon
Jt_Games
Gaza101
SuperProgrammer2006
ChocolatePi
Nowoon
theonlygusti
sithsiri
scrooge200
Scratcher1002Current Non-SupportersP.S. I know this can be workroundable, but it's REALLY tedious…
Blank1234
Last edited by NoMod-Programming (Oct. 9, 2015 02:44:34)
Long-since moved on from Scratch, if you need to find all my posts, search this in google: 3499447a51c01fc4dc1e8c3b8182b41cb0e88c67
- CGRises
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
Would they use this block either? NO!Therefore, new users don't have to use it.I don't even know what that does, but I don't use it either.So they may get confused by this:So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this shouldn't be implemented. I am trying to say new scratchers wound be confused.So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*([sin v] of (9))A lots of people don't understand what it is, but that block is still exist.
I
am childcritic
no longer forumposting
but still on on here
@speedyturtle has correctly guessed that the poem is a haiku.
AMV contest
- IronBit_Studios
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
Chill dude.Would they use this block either? NO!Therefore, new users don't have to use it.I don't even know what that does, but I don't use it either.So they may get confused by this:So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this shouldn't be implemented. I am trying to say new scratchers wound be confused.So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*([sin v] of (9))A lots of people don't understand what it is, but that block is still exist.
I know plenty of people who would use it.
- CGRises
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
Are they new?Chill dude.Would they use this block either? NO!Therefore, new users don't have to use it.I don't even know what that does, but I don't use it either.So they may get confused by this:So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this shouldn't be implemented. I am trying to say new scratchers wound be confused.So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*([sin v] of (9))A lots of people don't understand what it is, but that block is still exist.
I know plenty of people who would use it.
I
am childcritic
no longer forumposting
but still on on here
@speedyturtle has correctly guessed that the poem is a haiku.
AMV contest
- IronBit_Studios
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
What? no support
people would soon want more fonts just like how we want more fonts in the costume editor
>implying I want to add more fonts
Last edited by IronBit_Studios (Oct. 9, 2015 21:25:58)
- ScaleneParkour
- Scratcher
100+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
ive noticed some work for me some don't, anyways, it would make text engines easier and smoother Support, but couldn't use a text editor that's been made in Scratch already?
I make music and stuff, not very active but oh well
- ScaleneParkour
- Scratcher
100+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
Support!
I make music and stuff, not very active but oh well
- HardClaw57
- Scratcher
500+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
That's not a good reason. no support
people would soon want more fonts just like how we want more fonts in the costume editor
hai
- _JtGames
- Scratcher
41 posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
Then along with the new blocks should come new fonts, or maybe even an option to choose your own font from a certain file. Fonts aren't even that relevant anyway no support
people would soon want more fonts just like how we want more fonts in the costume editor
Attempting to make fun games
are as hard as making good signatures kbye
- _JtGames
- Scratcher
41 posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
that's not the point, the reason the block was added was so people don't have to be such mathematical geniuses to find a workaround for the block, although the workaround for trigonometry might be possible, who has time to program a scientific calculator into scratch. Same thing goes for the print() block, there might be a workaround but not many people know how to create a workaround for it. The print() block creates a solution for the workaround, it's convenient, less tedious and time efficient. plus it opens the door to more professional looking scratch projects.Are they new?Chill dude.Would they use this block either? NO!Therefore, new users don't have to use it.I don't even know what that does, but I don't use it either.So they may get confused by this:So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this shouldn't be implemented. I am trying to say new scratchers wound be confused.So we shouldn't make scratch complicated! That's why this need to be implement.you fail to see my point. My point was that intermediate blocks will make the system more complicated. You were talking about replacing basic blocks with intermediate workarounds. I can deal with that, but new scratchers can't.It's sarcasm don't you see? They have workarounds doesn't mean they shouldn't be add.There is a difference between intermediate block and intermediate workaround, and easy block and intermediate workaround. You're talking about removing blocks for beginners, and replacing with intermediate workarounds.Not just tedious, scratch is mainly for kids around 12 to learn how to program. We don't want to make things complicated. If you don't support it because it has a workaround, then we should remove these blocks too! They also have workarounds!I apologized for those who thought it was a rant.I understand, but that was a little harsh. No support. There is a workaround. I don't care about that you think the workaround is tedious. Just suck it up, deal with it. Because an intermediate workaround is not going to get you a tailor made block. I would just do the patchwork and deal with it *puts on sunglasses* sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.Programming is about critical thinking. Very few blocks ever get accepted, because they are workaroundable, or just plain not good ideas. I'm sorry if I am offending anyone. But it's the truth. sorry if you think this is a rant. I just am willing to work with what I already have.
*scratchblocks too long to quote*([sin v] of (9))A lots of people don't understand what it is, but that block is still exist.
I know plenty of people who would use it.
Attempting to make fun games
are as hard as making good signatures kbye
- DrKat123
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
"Print ___" Block (30+ Supporters)
Hello ? Add me to the supporters count please ? BUMP
Moving from Scratch? Don't learn C or Java, try Snap!
it haz OOP
DrKat McKatFace
First of all I'm 100% human and humans does not have a cat face
and second, the Boaty McBoatFace/Parsey McParseFace madness has just begun
λ
Sharp, my new Scratch mod
Is my post/siggy worthy for an internet?