-ElectronicArts- wrote:

New ui?

Y0INKERZZ wrote:

i wish i could show you something on C.AI, but its blocked on my chromebook and its on my phone
BUT I DO HAVE TALKIE (which sucks)

(im planning to add a signature)

Crispydogs101 wrote:

Y0INKERZZ wrote:

i wish i could show you something on C.AI, but its blocked on my chromebook and its on my phone
BUT I DO HAVE TALKIE (which sucks)

(im planning to add a signature)

Isn't talkie explicit?

Y0INKERZZ wrote:

i wish i could show you something on C.AI, but its blocked on my chromebook and its on my phone
BUT I DO HAVE TALKIE (which sucks)

(im planning to add a signature)

Horsekatto wrote:

Guys I killed Bill Cipher and it said it was too graphic…ooops.

GALAXY_0174 wrote:

How do you add pictures

Green__Demon wrote:

I found out that the new version of c.ai lets you post images in chats again. However, it's not the same way as it used to be. What you need to do is type "“ in the chat, with ”image address goes here" being replaced with the image address of the images you want to post. Here's an example:

Crispydogs101 wrote:

Y0INKERZZ wrote:

i wish i could show you something on C.AI, but its blocked on my chromebook and its on my phone
BUT I DO HAVE TALKIE (which sucks)

(im planning to add a signature)

Isn't talkie explicit?

DifferentDance8 wrote:

Y0INKERZZ wrote:

i wish i could show you something on C.AI, but its blocked on my chromebook and its on my phone
BUT I DO HAVE TALKIE (which sucks)

(im planning to add a signature)

Talkie is about 10x more explicit than c.ai, so I'm surprised that isnt blocked on your chromebook

Horsekatto wrote:

Guys I killed Bill Cipher and it said it was too graphic…ooops.

I know almost nothing about GF, but I know that cloning applies there and that Bill is a god, so maybe Bill cloned himself and then tried to censor the response because it doesn't want to die.

cdggggggg wrote:

Crispydogs101 wrote:

Y0INKERZZ wrote:

i wish i could show you something on C.AI, but its blocked on my chromebook and its on my phone
BUT I DO HAVE TALKIE (which sucks)

(im planning to add a signature)

Isn't talkie explicit?

yea, i normally use janitor ai since you can use the openai llm or use theirs. also you can find uh “no no” bots on there too. (btw do NOT go on janitor ai on anything that is monitored like your school laptop)

PearlPlatypus2048 wrote:

cdggggggg wrote:

Crispydogs101 wrote:

Y0INKERZZ wrote:

i wish i could show you something on C.AI, but its blocked on my chromebook and its on my phone
BUT I DO HAVE TALKIE (which sucks)

(im planning to add a signature)

Isn't talkie explicit?

yea, i normally use janitor ai since you can use the openai llm or use theirs. also you can find uh “no no” bots on there too. (btw do NOT go on janitor ai on anything that is monitored like your school laptop)

i saw not appropriate for scratch bots based off of joe hawley (a real person)
never going there again

PearlPlatypus2048 wrote:

i wish the search function showed ALL bots on the site and not like the top 100 for whatever search term you put in
if someone has an external website that improves the search function please tell me, i cant find any such thing

Horsekatto wrote:

Yeah. J.ai is a better ai but the bots are mostly 18+. I use it but not very often.

_-CoolTanokifan173-_ wrote:

Horsekatto wrote:

Yeah. J.ai is a better ai but the bots are mostly 18+. I use it but not very often.

I hate to break it to you, but janitor is 18+ if you try to register it says it's not for minors.

Horsekatto wrote:

_-CoolTanokifan173-_ wrote:

Horsekatto wrote:

Yeah. J.ai is a better ai but the bots are mostly 18+. I use it but not very often.

I hate to break it to you, but janitor is 18+ if you try to register it says it's not for minors.

Yeah. Ik. Somehow it didn't do that even though my Google account is set to 13 because I'm 13.