-TwentyFour- wrote:

Bump
BTW, from now onwards, I'm gonna keep a random fact for each bump.
Fact of the bump:
Life may have came from Mars, says Dr. Brandon Crater, some sceintist from Paris, France. (I didn't understand the laboratory name because it was written in some Frenchy language.) It may be such the early Earth was not able to make life. Rocks were able to escape Mars due to its low gravity than Earth. These rocks (later meteorites) were transport system for bacteria which may have lived on Mars. (SOURCE: Stephen & Lucy Hawking's Unlocking the Universe.)

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Bump
BTW, from now onwards, I'm gonna keep a random fact for each bump.
Fact of the bump:
Life may have came from Mars, says Dr. Brandon Crater, some sceintist from Paris, France. (I didn't understand the laboratory name because it was written in some Frenchy language.) It may be such the early Earth was not able to make life. Rocks were able to escape Mars due to its low gravity than Earth. These rocks (later meteorites) were transport system for bacteria which may have lived on Mars. (SOURCE: Stephen & Lucy Hawking's Unlocking the Universe.)

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Bump
BTW, from now onwards, I'm gonna keep a random fact for each bump.
Fact of the bump:
Life may have came from Mars, says Dr. Brandon Crater, some sceintist from Paris, France. (I didn't understand the laboratory name because it was written in some Frenchy language.) It may be such the early Earth was not able to make life. Rocks were able to escape Mars due to its low gravity than Earth. These rocks (later meteorites) were transport system for bacteria which may have lived on Mars. (SOURCE: Stephen & Lucy Hawking's Unlocking the Universe.)

Good idea. That'll create more activity since most people who have posted facts here seem to have run out of facts.

Anyways, about the fact, I thought the Earth was the only planet that was at the perfect distance from the sun to support life. How did the bacteria come from Mars? Was Mars different back then? Was the Sun different? How would bacteria survive a meteor landing? Btw I may be interested, but I don't actually know much about space, so if the answers to these questions are obvious, then I apologize.

-TwentyFour- wrote:

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Life may have came from Mars, says Dr. Brandon Crater, some sceintist from Paris, France. It may be such the early Earth was not able to make life. Rocks were able to escape Mars due to its low gravity than Earth. These rocks (later meteorites) were transport system for bacteria which may have lived on Mars.

I thought the Earth was the only planet that was at the perfect distance from the sun to support life. How did the bacteria come from Mars? Was Mars different back then? Was the Sun different? How would bacteria survive a meteor landing?

You have came across the questions which scientists are trying to answer.
Also, Mars is also in the habitable zone of sun.
-snip-
(Image from Wikipedia.)
Also, in the book (Unlocking the Universe) it says that an analysis of meteorite which came from Mars did show structures resembling fossil microbes.

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Life may have came from Mars, says Dr. Brandon Crater, some sceintist from Paris, France. It may be such the early Earth was not able to make life. Rocks were able to escape Mars due to its low gravity than Earth. These rocks (later meteorites) were transport system for bacteria which may have lived on Mars.

I thought the Earth was the only planet that was at the perfect distance from the sun to support life. How did the bacteria come from Mars? Was Mars different back then? Was the Sun different? How would bacteria survive a meteor landing?

You have came across the questions which scientists are trying to answer.
Also, Mars is also in the habitable zone of sun.
-snip-
(Image from Wikipedia.)
Also, in the book (Unlocking the Universe) it says that an analysis of meteorite which came from Mars did show structures resembling fossil microbes.

I just thought of another question. All living organisms need oxygen for respiration. So, does Mars have oxygen?
According to uncle Google, it does, and it's about 0.13% of the air of Mars, which is apparently 1% of earth's atmosphere. If this is true, then is that air enough to support the life of bacteria? Apparently bacteria multiply super quick, so, will Mars be able to support the life of so many bacteria.

(Uncle Google says yes.)

-TwentyFour- wrote:

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Life may have came from Mars, says Dr. Brandon Crater, some sceintist from Paris, France. It may be such the early Earth was not able to make life. Rocks were able to escape Mars due to its low gravity than Earth. These rocks (later meteorites) were transport system for bacteria which may have lived on Mars.

I thought the Earth was the only planet that was at the perfect distance from the sun to support life. How did the bacteria come from Mars? Was Mars different back then? Was the Sun different? How would bacteria survive a meteor landing?

You have came across the questions which scientists are trying to answer.
Also, Mars is also in the habitable zone of sun.
-snip-
(Image from Wikipedia.)
Also, in the book (Unlocking the Universe) it says that an analysis of meteorite which came from Mars did show structures resembling fossil microbes.

I just thought of another question. All living organisms need oxygen for respiration. So, does Mars have oxygen?
According to uncle Google, it does, and it's about 0.13% of the air of Mars, which is apparently 1% of earth's atmosphere. If this is true, then is that air enough to support the life of bacteria? Apparently bacteria multiply super quick, so, will Mars be able to support the life of so many bacteria.

(Uncle Google says yes.)

That's why people are assuming like that. But the ultimate question is, how did the bacteria able to survive meteorite landing? Sceintists successfully answered almost all the questions, except this.
(BTW, search with uncle Google “meteorite” and wait for sometime.)

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

ZanterZlox wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Life may have came from Mars, says Dr. Brandon Crater, some sceintist from Paris, France. It may be such the early Earth was not able to make life. Rocks were able to escape Mars due to its low gravity than Earth. These rocks (later meteorites) were transport system for bacteria which may have lived on Mars.

I thought the Earth was the only planet that was at the perfect distance from the sun to support life. How did the bacteria come from Mars? Was Mars different back then? Was the Sun different? How would bacteria survive a meteor landing?

You have came across the questions which scientists are trying to answer.
Also, Mars is also in the habitable zone of sun.
-snip-
(Image from Wikipedia.)
Also, in the book (Unlocking the Universe) it says that an analysis of meteorite which came from Mars did show structures resembling fossil microbes.

I just thought of another question. All living organisms need oxygen for respiration. So, does Mars have oxygen?
According to uncle Google, it does, and it's about 0.13% of the air of Mars, which is apparently 1% of earth's atmosphere. If this is true, then is that air enough to support the life of bacteria? Apparently bacteria multiply super quick, so, will Mars be able to support the life of so many bacteria.

(Uncle Google says yes.)

That's why people are assuming like that. But the ultimate question is, how did the bacteria able to survive meteorite landing? Sceintists successfully answered almost all the questions, except this.
(BTW, search with uncle Google “meteorite” and wait for sometime.)

Okay that's a cool Easter egg. Never knew about it.
But anyways, I guess my older questions are the ones that are not answered yet.

• How did bacteria come from Mars?
  Rocks on Mars escaped from gravitational field of Mars because it's very less massive compared to Earth. They landed on Earth. These rocks were transported the bacteria.
  
• Was Mars different back then?
  Maybe it was different, supportable for life. Also we've seen few pictures showing the evidence of flowing water.
  
• Was Sun different?
  Maybe not. Sun will change it's appearance, volume, etc when it will be a red giant. The orbit of planets was not fixed until a few million years the Solar system. Maybe Mars orbit is a near to sun back then and slowly moved away.
  

-Telekore- wrote:

This album sure sounds spacey.
I mean, it's literally tagged with SPACE Ambient

DifferentDance8 wrote:

does Experience Gravity by amanda fit here

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Bump
FOTB:
Matter (atoms, molecules etc.) is only 5% of total universe. Yes, it is! Then what's other 95%? It is dark matter (27%) and dark energy (68%). These doesn't contain the subatomic particles (electrons, protons, neutrons, photons, etc.) that matter contains. Sceintists are trying to know what particles these contain.

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Bump
FOTB:
Matter (atoms, molecules etc.) is only 5% of total universe. Yes, it is! Then what's other 95%? It is dark matter (27%) and dark energy (68%). These doesn't contain the subatomic particles (electrons, protons, neutrons, photons, etc.) that matter contains. Sceintists are trying to know what particles these contain.

-TwentyFour- wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Bump
FOTB:
Matter (atoms, molecules etc.) is only 5% of total universe. Yes, it is! Then what's other 95%? It is dark matter (27%) and dark energy (68%). These doesn't contain the subatomic particles (electrons, protons, neutrons, photons, etc.) that matter contains. Sceintists are trying to know what particles these contain.

Why no one are discussing about this?

JTanner2026 wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

Bump
FOTB:
Matter (atoms, molecules etc.) is only 5% of total universe. Yes, it is! Then what's other 95%? It is dark matter (27%) and dark energy (68%). These doesn't contain the subatomic particles (electrons, protons, neutrons, photons, etc.) that matter contains. Sceintists are trying to know what particles these contain.

Why no one are discussing about this?

because we knew that already

-TwentyFour- wrote:

I was 0 years old when I found:
Light redshifts or decreases it's frequency or loses energy while traveling in the expanding universe. (Google search “redshift of light” for more information.)
But am I only the one to realise that this lost energy may not really lost but gets converted into dark energy?