Discuss Scratch

#201May 20, 2020 17:37:41
Maximouse
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

If you are interested, here is what a Scratch Team member said about this.

This is Maximouse's signature. Learn more about signatures.
#202May 31, 2020 14:48:45
garnetluvcookie
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

turkey3_test wrote:

Support. Maybe a right-click option instead of a whole new block.
Mobile people are alive.


#203May 31, 2020 17:53:40
Maximouse
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

garnetluvcookie wrote:

turkey3_test wrote:

Support. Maybe a right-click option instead of a whole new block.
Mobile people are alive.
Can't you just long press instead?

This is Maximouse's signature. Learn more about signatures.
#204June 2, 2020 15:44:31
ninjaMAR
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

AlexeyChub wrote:

Support. This wouldn't be very complicated at all, and if >= is too complicated, that by that same logic sin() and cos() is also to complicated. This would also be very useful.
Same
#205June 2, 2020 17:23:24
coins_and_gems
Scratcher
67 posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

For Your Custom Blocks:
[category] hat::#2468ac hat
Control::control
Custom::custom
Events::events
Extension::extension
Grey::grey
Inputs [string](number::#bababa)<boolean::#bababa>[dropdown v v]::#ccc
List::list
Looks::looks
Motion::motion
Operators::operators
Pen::pen
Red::red
Sensing::sensing
Sound::sound
Variables::variables
#2468ac::#2468ac
[category] cap::#2468ac cap

Last edited by coins_and_gems (June 2, 2020 17:24:31)

Can you please ♥ and ★ this project so it doesn't get deleted? If you don't, it will be gone by 2023!
#206June 2, 2020 19:22:20
coder2045
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

coins_and_gems wrote:

For Your Custom Blocks:
[category] hat::#2468ac hat
Control::control
Custom::custom
Events::events
Extension::extension
Grey::grey
Inputs [string](number::#bababa)<boolean::#bababa>[dropdown v v]::#ccc
List::list
Looks::looks
Motion::motion
Operators::operators
Pen::pen
Red::red
Sensing::sensing
Sound::sound
Variables::variables
#2468ac::#2468ac
[category] cap::#2468ac cap
Please try to be constructive.
Anyway, for the 3rd time,
<not <[...] < [...]>> //>=
There's your workaround.
Highlight this text and press Ctrl-Shift-Down to view more of my signature. There's a lot in there.
I FOUND THE POSTIE POSTIE POST LINK THIS
Brainteaser: What comes next? Answer on my profile. First correct answer gets a follow.

[ ]
[ [ ] ]
[ [ [ ] ] [ ] ]
Good projects ⬇️




#207June 2, 2020 19:30:56
frogadier63
Scratcher
100+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

Yes this would be useful. Especially if you have to do something like this: 

<<[my variable] = [5]> or <[my variable] > [5]>> and <<[my variable] < [10]> or <[my variable] = [10]>>

Last edited by frogadier63 (June 2, 2020 19:31:34)



#208July 3, 2020 17:54:33
DarthVader4Life
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

SuperDoom wrote:

I'd personally prefer a block that looks like this.
<[] [= v] [] :: operators>
The dropdown menu would have =, <, >, and yes, ≥ and ≤. It would be a simple replacement for the already existing variables, and there wouldn't be any confusion.

Ten posts left.
I personally agree with this.
but yes, there are easy workarounds, but the 
wait until <>
has a one block workaround,
repeat until <>

end
and they still have the wait until.

Last edited by DarthVader4Life (June 25, 2021 00:56:57)

Be Moist Also, here's a helpful link to Ocular
I am DV4L, Erector of Text Walls, Typer of Long Posts, Creator of Mini-mod posts
The kumquats have eaten this line, so I have to have a new way to repel them.
Had a bad day or are feeling bored? Watch this to make your day better in an interesting way.
Do you think you've been banned unfairly? Then you'd be wrong. The ST aren't children, so quit acting like they are.
#209July 3, 2020 18:03:04
HTML-Fan
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

You can just use
<not <(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)>>
instead of
<(x :: grey) ≤ (y :: grey) :: operators>
No support, too easy workaround.
Joke of the century: Just made a good remix of this with Scratch's music extension.
                      BE MOIST B) AND CHECK OUT
 _____              ______ _                          _                 
|_   _|             |  _  (_)                        (_)                
  | |_      _____   | | | |_ _ __ ___   ___ _ __  ___ _  ___  _ __  ___       #RoadToMoist100
  | \ \ /\ / / _ \  | | | | | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ '_ \/ __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __|
  | |\ V  V / (_) | | |/ /| | | | | | |  __/ | | \__ \ | (_) | | | \__ \
  \_/ \_/\_/ \___/  |___/ |_|_| |_| |_|\___|_| |_|___/_|\___/|_| |_|___/
#210July 3, 2020 18:24:21
DarthVader4Life
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

HTML-Fan wrote:

You can just use
<not <(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)>>
instead of
<(x :: grey) ≤ (y :: grey) :: operators>
No support, too easy workaround.
Read the quote below.

DarthVader4Life wrote:

-snip-
but yes, there are easy workarounds, but the 
wait until <>
has a one block workaround,
repeat until <>

end
and they still have the wait until

Last edited by DarthVader4Life (June 25, 2021 00:57:38)

Be Moist Also, here's a helpful link to Ocular
I am DV4L, Erector of Text Walls, Typer of Long Posts, Creator of Mini-mod posts
The kumquats have eaten this line, so I have to have a new way to repel them.
Had a bad day or are feeling bored? Watch this to make your day better in an interesting way.
Do you think you've been banned unfairly? Then you'd be wrong. The ST aren't children, so quit acting like they are.
#211July 3, 2020 23:53:53
BlueStarPort
Scratcher
100+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

Support. This helps save a bit of time making a workaround, and it's useful for games where you have to get a set score.
Sun - a parallax: https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/409534811/
be moist
#212July 4, 2020 10:50:34
-InsanityPlays-
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

Workaround. Do
<(this is the workaround) > [5]>
instead of
<<(this is the long way) = [6]> or <(this is the long way) > [6]>>
.

Last edited by -InsanityPlays- (July 4, 2020 10:54:52)

Welcome to my signature!
I've moved accounts. Anyway, did this post help you? Go follow me on my new account!
Today's Links: Scratch 4.0 Leaked Information, Astronomical - The Third, The Forum Community
follow me on scratch or i am sad, subscribe to my YouTube channel or bad luck for the rest of your life
My Final Shoutout: hekcer because in computer science class, he is the hekcerman
-InsanityPlays- Fan Studio! (closed) | Astronomical - The Third | Best of -InsanityPlays- 2020
my channel, my website, ctrl+shift+down for more STUFF







2020's Advent Collection:

more STUFF
#213July 4, 2020 11:17:44
Nambaseking01
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

Support.

Special < and > tags get used a lot in different programming languages, and I feel like this should be referenced since Scratch is like a “start to different languages”. Additionally, it would just be useful because it's annoying to always choose the number lower than the one you need for things like shops.
Hey there! My name is Nammy. I'm a male Forum Helper and Scratch Wiki Editor.
Profile | Test Account | Talk with me here! | Griffpatch is quitting Scratch?!
#214July 4, 2020 23:14:55
BlueStarPort
Scratcher
100+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

-InsanityPlays- wrote:

Workaround. Do
<(this is the workaround) > [5]>
instead of
<<(this is the long way) = [6]> or <(this is the long way) > [6]>>
.
(deleted)

Last edited by BlueStarPort (July 4, 2020 23:16:06)

Sun - a parallax: https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/409534811/
be moist
#215July 5, 2020 07:20:05
HTML-Fan
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

-InsanityPlays- wrote:

Workaround. Do
<(this is the workaround) > [5]>
instead of
<<(this is the long way) = [6]> or <(this is the long way) > [6]>>
.
Much easier:

HTML-Fan wrote:

You can just use
<not <(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)>>
instead of
<(x :: grey) ≤ (y :: grey) :: operators>
Joke of the century: Just made a good remix of this with Scratch's music extension.
                      BE MOIST B) AND CHECK OUT
 _____              ______ _                          _                 
|_   _|             |  _  (_)                        (_)                
  | |_      _____   | | | |_ _ __ ___   ___ _ __  ___ _  ___  _ __  ___       #RoadToMoist100
  | \ \ /\ / / _ \  | | | | | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ '_ \/ __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __|
  | |\ V  V / (_) | | |/ /| | | | | | |  __/ | | \__ \ | (_) | | | \__ \
  \_/ \_/\_/ \___/  |___/ |_|_| |_| |_|\___|_| |_|___/_|\___/|_| |_|___/
#216July 5, 2020 07:23:44
fdreerf
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

HTML-Fan wrote:

-InsanityPlays- wrote:

Workaround. Do
-
instead of
-
Much easier:

HTML-Fan wrote:

You can just use
-
instead of
-
That workaround requires an additional block.
Hyped for MS-DOS 11.0
#217July 5, 2020 07:25:05
HTML-Fan
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

fdreerf wrote:

-snip-
That workaround requires an additional block.
Yes, but you don't have to duplicate (This is the long way).
Joke of the century: Just made a good remix of this with Scratch's music extension.
                      BE MOIST B) AND CHECK OUT
 _____              ______ _                          _                 
|_   _|             |  _  (_)                        (_)                
  | |_      _____   | | | |_ _ __ ___   ___ _ __  ___ _  ___  _ __  ___       #RoadToMoist100
  | \ \ /\ / / _ \  | | | | | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ '_ \/ __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __|
  | |\ V  V / (_) | | |/ /| | | | | | |  __/ | | \__ \ | (_) | | | \__ \
  \_/ \_/\_/ \___/  |___/ |_|_| |_| |_|\___|_| |_|___/_|\___/|_| |_|___/
#218July 5, 2020 07:29:01
fdreerf
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

HTML-Fan wrote:

fdreerf wrote:

-snip-
That workaround requires an additional block.
Yes, but you don't have to duplicate (This is the long way).
?
Hyped for MS-DOS 11.0
#219July 5, 2020 07:32:30
HTML-Fan
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

<not <(x :: grey) < (y :: grey)>>
is way shorter then
<<(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)> or <(x :: grey) = (y :: grey)>>
Joke of the century: Just made a good remix of this with Scratch's music extension.
                      BE MOIST B) AND CHECK OUT
 _____              ______ _                          _                 
|_   _|             |  _  (_)                        (_)                
  | |_      _____   | | | |_ _ __ ___   ___ _ __  ___ _  ___  _ __  ___       #RoadToMoist100
  | \ \ /\ / / _ \  | | | | | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ '_ \/ __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __|
  | |\ V  V / (_) | | |/ /| | | | | | |  __/ | | \__ \ | (_) | | | \__ \
  \_/ \_/\_/ \___/  |___/ |_|_| |_| |_|\___|_| |_|___/_|\___/|_| |_|___/
#220July 5, 2020 07:39:47
fdreerf
Scratcher
1000+ posts

≥ and ≤ in operators

HTML-Fan wrote:

<not <(x :: grey) < (y :: grey)>>
is way shorter then
<<(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)> or <(x :: grey) = (y :: grey)>>
I'm aware. That's why they suggested to just do
<(x :: grey) > (y -  1:: grey)>
which is mathematically incorrect.
Hyped for MS-DOS 11.0

Powered by DjangoBB