60 seconds between posts?

gregory9

Why do scratchers have to wait 60 seconds between posts?

giratina12_test

gregory9 wrote:
Why do scratchers have to wait 60 seconds between posts?

It prevents spamming.

NoxSpooth

Giratina is right.

Also, you should be thanking the Scratch Team for having to wait 60 seconds. New Scratchers have to wait 180 seconds between posts.

Last edited by NoxSpooth (July 28, 2013 03:09:17)

Rumanti

giratina12_test wrote:
gregory9 wrote:
Why do scratchers have to wait 60 seconds between posts?
It prevents spamming.

To precise, reduce it.

scimonster

If people could post every couple seconds, the forums would be overrun by spam. That's why New Scratchers need to wait 3 minutes between posts, because unfortunately, we get a whole lot of spammers. Scratchers are more trusted, but still sometimes spaz out and post a lot for no reason. Take a look below at what would happen if there was no time limit:

scimonster

random spam post

scimonster

blah blah blah

scimonster

See the problem?
And if it's inappropriate spam… 0_o

joshuaho

@ scimonster:
(removed- please don't spam with meaningless posts.)

HAHA, it was just a joke. I know that you are just providing a example of what would happen if there was no 60/180 rule.

Last edited by joshuaho (Aug. 7, 2013 20:57:25)

Rumanti

joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p

dvd4

Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p

Me too !

wait…. this gives me an idea…

_waffle_

dvd4 wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p
Me too !

wait…. this gives me an idea…

Me too !

What a coincidence…

_gobo_

_waffle_ wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p
Me too !

wait…. this gives me an idea…
Me too !

What a coincidence…

Me too !

I like this idea…

DotDash

_gobo_ wrote:
_waffle_ wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p
Me too !

wait…. this gives me an idea…
Me too !

What a coincidence…
Me too !

I like this idea…

SSSTTTAAAHHHPPP!!!

Rumanti

DotDash wrote:
_gobo_ wrote:
_waffle_ wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p
Me too !

wait…. this gives me an idea…
Me too !

What a coincidence…
Me too !

I like this idea…
SSSTTTAAAHHHPPP!!!

Actually, WE'RE the one who's SPAMMING, not Sciomonster

Ean173

There is the rule in the posts, but in projects, if it is 5 comments exactly the same, you can's comment that for like, 30 secs?

scimonster

Rumanti wrote:
DotDash wrote:
_gobo_ wrote:
_waffle_ wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p
Me too !

wait…. this gives me an idea…
Me too !

What a coincidence…
Me too !

I like this idea…
SSSTTTAAAHHHPPP!!!

Actually, WE'RE the one who's SPAMMING, not Sciomonster

That's right. dvd4…

Rumanti

scimonster wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
DotDash wrote:
_gobo_ wrote:
_waffle_ wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p
Me too !

wait…. this gives me an idea…
Me too !

What a coincidence…
Me too !

I like this idea…
SSSTTTAAAHHHPPP!!!

Actually, WE'RE the one who's SPAMMING, not Sciomonster
That's right. dvd4…

LET'S STOP THAT. NOW.

Last edited by Rumanti (Aug. 8, 2013 15:02:45)

dvd4

scimonster wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
DotDash wrote:
_gobo_ wrote:
_waffle_ wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Wow, I never seen a moderator spam before! LOL.

Just kidding. I know that this spam is just a example of what happens without the 60/180 rule.

I was just going to say the same! :p
Me too !

wait…. this gives me an idea…
Me too !

What a coincidence…
Me too !

I like this idea…
SSSTTTAAAHHHPPP!!!

Actually, WE'RE the one who's SPAMMING, not Sciomonster
That's right. dvd4…

I'm not rumanti…

But I am _waffle_ and _gobo_ (But not _meow_)

Rumanti

dvd4 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
DotDash wrote:
_gobo_ wrote:
_waffle_ wrote:
dvd4 wrote:
Rumanti wrote:
joshuaho wrote:
scimonster wrote:
blah blah blah
Blah
Blah
Bleh Bloh Bluh.
Me too !

Blah blah
Me too !

Blablabla.
SSSTTTAAAHHHPPP!!!

Actually, WE'RE the one who's SPAMMING, not Sciomonster
That's right. dvd4 Rumanti…
I'm not rumanti…

But I am _waffle_ and _gobo_ (But not _meow_)

I'm Rumanti!

Wait…this is a way to spam without 60 secs rule! (But 60 secs rule for EVERYONE, A has to wait B and C…That would be horrible )

Discuss Scratch