The Informal and Unofficial List of Rejected Suggestions

unisparks8

CaptFrIEdshrimp wrote:
unisparks8 wrote:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/870490/?page=3#post-9343223 found this
You mean my topic I abandoned and given up on?

Im just doing my job

mariofan864

Should I be the new owner of TIAULORS in 2027?
Also should you change the part in 9.1 where it says “changing @Za-Chary to @ZA-CHARY” into “changing @Catscratcher07 to @CATSCRATCHER07”?

Last edited by mariofan864 (Aug. 19, 2026 20:29:32)

WigglyJoey

mariofan864 wrote:
Should I be the new owner of TIAULORS in 2027?
Also should you change the part in 9.1 where it says “changing @Za-Chary to @ZA-CHARY” into “changing @Catscratcher07 to @CATSCRATCHER07”?

1, It depends if the user wants to continue hosting this
2, agreed, people would think it's nameshaming if it isn't changed

DeathReviews

WigglyJoey wrote:
mariofan864 wrote:
Should I be the new owner of TIAULORS in 2027?
Also should you change the part in 9.1 where it says “changing @Za-Chary to @ZA-CHARY” into “changing @Catscratcher07 to @CATSCRATCHER07”?
1, It depends if the user wants to continue hosting this
2, agreed, people would think it's nameshaming if it isn't changed

It should be this

The list should have wrote:
however, changing @ExampleUser to @EXAMPLEUSER is NOT rejected.

Or something like that.
That way, we don’t have to worry about the current owner.

Last edited by DeathReviews (Aug. 20, 2026 02:10:41)

UserBlockedYou

mariofan864 wrote:
(#122)
Should I be the new owner of TIAULORS in 2027?
Also should you change the part in 9.1 where it says “changing @Za-Chary to @ZA-CHARY” into “changing @Catscratcher07 to @CATSCRATCHER07”?

they prolly aint gonna switch ownership until scratch 4.0 comes out

OMGCHOVIE2013

@CatScratcher07, can we share projects that tell how our suggestion works?

if <[make how suggestion works project?] = [yes]> then
create project
end

define create project
broadcast [create project v]

OMGCHOVIE2013

AdaVesta_ wrote:
bitmap_caketin wrote:
Yes, I would remove the remix tree: I don't think that that was a rejection, more of an explanation of the removal.
agreed.

please no

bitmap_caketin

OMGCHOVIE2013 wrote:
AdaVesta_ wrote:
bitmap_caketin wrote:
Yes, I would remove the remix tree: I don't think that that was a rejection, more of an explanation of the removal.
agreed.
please no

It's not removing the remix tree, it's removing the entry about remix trees being rejected.

NutOfCoco

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/899447/

Davyd_The_Owl

NutOfCoco wrote:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/899447/

Was that entirely helpful?

Davyd_The_Owl

Knowing to make suggestion can help make a better community.
But a problem with the community are users who often not allow commenting.

So we don't know the reason why they don't allow commenting.
Well, that's because they don't say why, and they think they don't want users to advertise.

So that's why I think it is maybe rude to make this.

Discuss Scratch