A button to both heart and star

Za-Chary

BitcoinFarmer wrote:
This […] has no real downsides.

Possibly visual clutter? Hard to say without a mockup. Where would such a button go, and what exactly would it look like?

unisparks8

7salad3salad wrote:
Why is clicking both painful? Is it not just 2 taps? Sounds kind of pointless.

Saves your mouse from unnecessary clicks.
60 seconds

Ngn5

what about holding the mouse down for a few seconds on either of the heart and star buttons? wouldn't that be better than a whole new button?

The-redwall-nerd

Ngn5 wrote:
what about holding the mouse down for a few seconds on either of the heart and star buttons? wouldn't that be better than a whole new button?

I like that idea, maybe like 1 second clicks both?

bitmap_caketin

Surely if the project is good enough, it's worth the agonising pain of clicking two buttons instead of one?

purplebunny63

ilIusionator wrote:
….
we have reached PEAK laziness.

just, press both buttons? I don't get how thats so difficult

I feel you made this suggestion just cause you can.
“why not” is not good reasoning for ANY suggestion

Yeah like what’s next? A system that uses voice commands so you don’t ever have to push a single button?? lol

BitcoinFarmer

bump

scratchy_boy106

7salad3salad wrote:
Why is clicking both painful? Is it not just 2 taps? Sounds kind of pointless.

Queen_Bee_12 wrote:
I don't think clicking the screen twice is very difficult, so it seems kind of unnecessary in my opinion.

I agree

knowitall1237

No support, takes space on the screen just to save one second of time
UI clutter is a potential issue which should not be ignored

BitcoinFarmer

knowitall1237 wrote:
No support, takes space on the screen just to save one second of time
UI clutter is a potential issue which should not be ignored

We have plenty of space right now and you can build a clutter free design easily.

Discuss Scratch