BitcoinFarmer wrote:

This […] has no real downsides.

Possibly visual clutter? Hard to say without a mockup. Where would such a button go, and what exactly would it look like?

7salad3salad wrote:

Why is clicking both painful? Is it not just 2 taps? Sounds kind of pointless.

Saves your mouse from unnecessary clicks.
60 seconds

what about holding the mouse down for a few seconds on either of the heart and star buttons? wouldn't that be better than a whole new button?

Ngn5 wrote:

what about holding the mouse down for a few seconds on either of the heart and star buttons? wouldn't that be better than a whole new button?

I like that idea, maybe like 1 second clicks both?

Surely if the project is good enough, it's worth the agonising pain of clicking two buttons instead of one?

ilIusionator wrote:

….
we have reached PEAK laziness.

just, press both buttons? I don't get how thats so difficult

I feel you made this suggestion just cause you can.
“why not” is not good reasoning for ANY suggestion

Yeah like what’s next? A system that uses voice commands so you don’t ever have to push a single button?? lol

bump

7salad3salad wrote:

Why is clicking both painful? Is it not just 2 taps? Sounds kind of pointless.

Queen_Bee_12 wrote:

I don't think clicking the screen twice is very difficult, so it seems kind of unnecessary in my opinion.

I agree

No support, takes space on the screen just to save one second of time
UI clutter is a potential issue which should not be ignored

knowitall1237 wrote:

No support, takes space on the screen just to save one second of time
UI clutter is a potential issue which should not be ignored

We have plenty of space right now and you can build a clutter free design easily.

BitcoinFarmer wrote:

knowitall1237 wrote:

No support, takes space on the screen just to save one second of time
UI clutter is a potential issue which should not be ignored

We have plenty of space right now and you can build a clutter free design easily.

Just because there's space doesn't mean that it should be added.
You also have to keep in mind that some people want to love or favorite, not both.

Don't support, useless and serves no purpose, a human should be able to click two buttons on a screen and not find it a big enough problem to code an entire button for. Has no benefits.

Spooky_Lukey wrote:

BitcoinFarmer wrote:

knowitall1237 wrote:

No support, takes space on the screen just to save one second of time
UI clutter is a potential issue which should not be ignored

We have plenty of space right now and you can build a clutter free design easily.

Just because there's space doesn't mean that it should be added.
You also have to keep in mind that some people want to love or favorite, not both.

Yeah but you can still do both alone OR you have a button that does them at the same time, saving you a click.
So where's the problem?

0_o-Ivan-o_0 wrote:

Don't support, useless and serves no purpose, a human should be able to click two buttons on a screen and not find it a big enough problem to code an entire button for. Has no benefits.

Well, it's just practical! Lots of people like AND favorite.