(略)
11. Prohibited Conduct
BY USING THE SERVICE, YOU AGREE NOT TO:
(略)
8. interfere with the operation of the Service or any user’s enjoyment of the Service, including by:
(略)
(ii) making any unsolicited offer or advertisement to another user of the Service;
(略)

gccxnondx wrote:

～略～
許可が出ていない場所での宣伝などが利用規約で明示的に出来なくなったという認識でよろしいでしょうか。

宣伝が「オフトピック」と考えられる場所、たとえば:
・他人のプロジェクトのコメント欄
・他人のプロフィールのコメント欄(可能性のある例外 - フォロワーのプロフィールはよいかもしれません - でも最初に確認すべきです)
・Show and Tell以外のディスカッションフォーラム内の場所(訳注: 日本語フォーラムの場合、宣伝、告知、依頼をするコーナー以外のトピック)
・宣伝するプロジェクトと関係ないスタジオ

Additional Terms. Your use of the Service is subject to all additional terms, policies, rules, or guidelines applicable to the Service or certain features of the Service that we may post on or link to from the Service (the “Additional Terms”). All Additional Terms are incorporated by this reference into, and made a part of, these Terms.

3.7 AIで生成された画像の使用の禁止
・AI生成かどうか確実に判別するのは不可能
・創造性を高めるメリットがある

Paddle2See wrote:

In my opinion, such a ban would be unenforceable as it is not always possible to distinguish between AI generated art and human generated art.  This will only get more difficult as AI improves.  

Additionally - I can visualize situations where AI generated art could be beneficial when creating a project.   Maybe the creative efforts of the project are focused more on the coding aspects and the visual appearance of the project is secondary to the concepts incorporated in the coding.  AI generation could be helpful there - just as a standard clip-art libraries are useful.  I do think that credit to the tool used to create the images should still be given just as credit for other project assets should be given.