catsarebest1 wrote:

codubee wrote:

Someone2939 wrote:

Please stop spreading misinformation. A single moderator's words were misinterpreted and it is false that the moderators were not informed about the ToS.

so your saying this whole information is false and scratch ai is never gonna get added?

So you're saying the ToS is about adding AI? The ToS is a reflection of having to shift our policies with the times and current legal frameworks, are we supposed to bury our heads in the sand and ignore it, meanwhile 5,000 AI startups are continuously skimming all publicly shared projects multiple times a day?

it litterly is about how its gonna use OUR coding/sprites without credit and we cant do anything about it

catsarebest1 wrote:

codubee wrote:

Someone2939 wrote:

Please stop spreading misinformation. A single moderator's words were misinterpreted and it is false that the moderators were not informed about the ToS.

so your saying this whole information is false and scratch ai is never gonna get added?

So you're saying the ToS is about adding AI? The ToS is a reflection of having to shift our policies with the times and current legal frameworks, are we supposed to bury our heads in the sand and ignore it, meanwhile 5,000 AI startups are continuously skimming all publicly shared projects multiple times a day?

it litterly is about how its gonna use OUR coding/sprites without credit and we cant do anything about it

littlejoeywhoiscool wrote:

codubee wrote:

littlejoeywhoiscool wrote:

Just a little question… who made this decision? And did everyone in Scratch Team initially agree on it?

What decision are you talking about? A single person did not make this decision, stop spreading lies about how the “Scratch Team” has no power, or somehow wasn't involved in the decision. The Team is part of that decision making process, _by definition_.

I meant the AI thing

codubee wrote:

Someone2939 wrote:

Please stop spreading misinformation. A single moderator's words were misinterpreted and it is false that the moderators were not informed about the ToS.

so your saying this whole information is false and scratch ai is never gonna get added?

So you're saying the ToS is about adding AI? The ToS is a reflection of having to shift our policies with the times and current legal frameworks, are we supposed to bury our heads in the sand and ignore it, meanwhile 5,000 AI startups are continuously skimming all publicly shared projects multiple times a day?

codubee wrote:

littlejoeywhoiscool wrote:

codubee wrote:

littlejoeywhoiscool wrote:

Just a little question… who made this decision? And did everyone in Scratch Team initially agree on it?

What decision are you talking about? A single person did not make this decision, stop spreading lies about how the “Scratch Team” has no power, or somehow wasn't involved in the decision. The Team is part of that decision making process, _by definition_.

I meant the AI thing

Yes and so did I.

littlejoeywhoiscool wrote:

This AI thingie is giving me the heebie jeebies man, if y’all add it, then lotta people gonna leave. And I don’t care about “This >50 yo built this app nothing but Claude and a box of scraps!!” baloney.

Someone2939 wrote:

i am just so confused right now.

ChristianScratcher1 wrote:

So lemme get this straight
80-90% of what I heard abt the AI thingy was misinfo?

codubee wrote:

ChristianScratcher1 wrote:

So lemme get this straight
80-90% of what I heard abt the AI thingy was misinfo?

Probably more.

Someone2939 wrote:

catsarebest1 wrote:

codubee wrote:

Someone2939 wrote:

Please stop spreading misinformation. A single moderator's words were misinterpreted and it is false that the moderators were not informed about the ToS.

so your saying this whole information is false and scratch ai is never gonna get added?

So you're saying the ToS is about adding AI? The ToS is a reflection of having to shift our policies with the times and current legal frameworks, are we supposed to bury our heads in the sand and ignore it, meanwhile 5,000 AI startups are continuously skimming all publicly shared projects multiple times a day?

it litterly is about how its gonna use OUR coding/sprites without credit and we cant do anything about it

the thing i was saying was all just about a question.

Magudragon wrote:

codubee wrote:

Someone2939 wrote:

Please stop spreading misinformation. A single moderator's words were misinterpreted and it is false that the moderators were not informed about the ToS.

so your saying this whole information is false and scratch ai is never gonna get added?

So you're saying the ToS is about adding AI? The ToS is a reflection of having to shift our policies with the times and current legal frameworks, are we supposed to bury our heads in the sand and ignore it, meanwhile 5,000 AI startups are continuously skimming all publicly shared projects multiple times a day?

Don't take my post for granted yet unless you're codubee
So you're saying the TOS was only changed because external A.I. from other corporations can train off projects from the Scratch website?

80% of the people on this forum are only casual readers, and are probably under the age for good enough reading comprehension, most of us need an answer as direct as possible, instead of it being jumbled in slices between the lines. if it's not direct enough, people will get confused and keep complaining about “AI being added to Scratch”.
You could have said:
“We have only made way for AI in the TOS becuase AI from other corporations can visit and train of the website, we don't plan on adding AI yet”

littlejoeywhoiscool wrote:

Who made up all this misinformation?

EDawg2011 wrote:

codubee wrote:

#3093
snip

Thanks. Can you please tell us what you think about the potential new CLA and this video? https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/youtube/tGwu-7jTeaY/ Also, what if Scratch Team members protested against this AI?
Also: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/9012972 https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/9011912 https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/9013687

I wrote:

Don't take my post for granted yet unless you're codubee
So you're saying the TOS was only changed because external A.I. from other corporations can train off projects from the Scratch website?

80% of the people on this forum are only casual readers, and are probably under the age for good enough reading comprehension, most of us need an answer as direct as possible, instead of it being jumbled in slices between the lines. if it's not direct enough, people will get confused and keep complaining about “AI being added to Scratch”.
You could have said:
“We have only made way for AI in the TOS becuase AI from other corporations can visit and train of the website, we didn't change the TOS for AI to be added to the Scratch platform”

codubee wrote:

Someone2939 wrote:

catsarebest1 wrote:

codubee wrote:

Someone2939 wrote:

Please stop spreading misinformation. A single moderator's words were misinterpreted and it is false that the moderators were not informed about the ToS.

so your saying this whole information is false and scratch ai is never gonna get added?

So you're saying the ToS is about adding AI? The ToS is a reflection of having to shift our policies with the times and current legal frameworks, are we supposed to bury our heads in the sand and ignore it, meanwhile 5,000 AI startups are continuously skimming all publicly shared projects multiple times a day?

it litterly is about how its gonna use OUR coding/sprites without credit and we cant do anything about it

the thing i was saying was all just about a question.

Yes, leading questions that have misinformation/misleading info built into them.

Almost every “question” I've seen in this thread is of the “have you stopped stealing food from your family?” type.

I'm responding to _everyone_ in this thread because of the massive volume of misinformed our outright misinformation being posted. Apologies if you, in particular, did not add to this.

Magudragon wrote:

my lord

I wrote:

Don't take my post for granted yet unless you're codubee
So you're saying the TOS was only changed because external A.I. from other corporations can train off projects from the Scratch website?

80% of the people on this forum are only casual readers, and are probably under the age for good enough reading comprehension, most of us need an answer as direct as possible, instead of it being jumbled in slices between the lines. if it's not direct enough, people will get confused and keep complaining about “AI being added to Scratch”.
You could have said:
“We have only made way for AI in the TOS becuase AI from other corporations can visit and train of the website, we didn't change the TOS for AI to be added to the Scratch platform”