The Informal and Unofficial List of Rejected Suggestions

gdpr7314264727b19c01a53ed58b

Za-Chary wrote:
Strictly speaking, it's not rejected, since it's not even closed. I agree it would be rejected — but I don't have the authority to determine that. Nevertheless, I probably would not add it to the list anyway since I don't see it suggested often.

Fair honestly, you're right since it's not been rejected yet, as it isn't even closed. Fair.

Za-Chary wrote:
Zydrolic wrote:
snapdrag0ns wrote:
Question: what is the status of the idea of a search box for the forums?
Please ask on Questions about Scratch, not on TOLoRS.
Just saying because it doesn't belong here. Thank you.
They can ask here; they are asking if a suggestion is rejected or not. That is relevant to this thread.

Oh, alright. My apologies.

Za-Chary wrote:
Zydrolic wrote:
Topics get closed at 500 pages(or above) to save server costs and space;
That's not true. Forum topics don't get closed just because they are above a certain number of pages.

My apologies, I thought they did get closed at 500 pages.

Lego_Kai

I think the Scratch Team could think about 2.6 (Increase the clone limit) and 8.3 (Show when users are online).
2.6 could be added by letting people choose what they want their personal clone limit to be. They could also decrease their personal clone limit to below 300, too.
8.6 could be added by giving an option to show if they are online or not.

k7e

Lego_Kai wrote:
2.6 could be added by letting people choose what they want their personal clone limit to be. They could also decrease their personal clone limit to below 300, too.

What if someone sets it to 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888?
If you want it below 300, just code it so you can't have more than the desired number of clones.

TheReal_BestGamer

(long unnecessary quote removed by moderator - please don't spam)

I'm not sure how the suggestion forums work, and this is the best I can do, I'd like to state that I do not consider ai moderators a solution to any problems, ai are too glitchy to be an option, while I have no say in the matter, I'd appreciate if you took this into consideration if it is requested by someone else.

Last edited by Paddle2See (June 28, 2023 20:50:15)

Go-Perry-T-Platypus

Is this Scratch 1880 to 2505?

KouSiuu21

Hey, Can you add

when [ Sprite1v] clicked

Adventure_studio

Remove update contrast

k7e

Adventure_studio wrote:
Remove update contrast

@Za-Chary is not a Scratch Team member, so he can not unreject suggestions. I don't think he's removing it from the list because it's suggested quite frequently.

gdpr7314264727b19c01a53ed58b

Adventure_studio wrote:
Remove update contrast

Honestly contrast helped my ADHD out in focusing by being eye-catching as a peice of code I cannot understand and cannot make sense of even if I did the code.
I personally don't agree with you. Plus:

k7e wrote:
Adventure_studio wrote:
Remove update contrast
@Za-Chary is not a Scratch Team member, so he can not unreject suggestions. I don't think he's removing it from the list because it's suggested quite frequently.

Genuine facts here, as said above:
@Za-Chary is a retired Scratch Team Member, he is no longer apart of the Scratch Team;
Also this is suggested frequently and like said, he cannot unreject a rejected suggestion.

Last edited by gdpr7314264727b19c01a53ed58b (June 29, 2023 11:57:10)

Elijah999999

KouSiuu21 wrote:
Hey, Can you add
when [ Sprite1v] clicked

Could you provide a link to where that was suggested, and a link to which post rejected it? (Must be from a Scratch Team member.)

k7e

This might seem… minor, but here it is:
On 1.6, the block currently looks like this:

add () to sublist () of [list v] :: list

However, I don't think that the first input should be a number input, it should be a text input (similar to the add to list block), so the block should look like this:

add [] to sublist () of [list v] :: list

Za-Chary

Sliverus wrote:
And I think Section 7 should be split into “Scratch Community” and “Website Features”.

Thanks for the feedback. I have to wait on this since I won't have time today to deep-clean the list, but I'm still interested in doing it. I'm also interested in hearing others' thoughts on this (splitting Section 7 into two sections) if anyone has feedback.

wikibro300000 wrote:
Can you add links to the list of contents to?

The list of contents is the 20th post on this thread — at the bottom of the first page of the thread. I also add a link in the OP: "Click here for a table of contents with shorter explanations on why suggestions are rejected." What specific links do you want me to add?

k7e wrote:
This might seem… minor, but here it is:
On 1.6, the block currently looks like this:
add () to sublist () of [list v] :: list
However, I don't think that the first input should be a number input, it should be a text input (similar to the add to list block), so the block should look like this:
add [] to sublist () of [list v] :: list

Done, thanks. I figured I used ( ) to make it more consistent with how 3.0 blocks look, but the comment block displayed in 1.12 also uses [ ], so whatever.

Sliverus

Do you think @jvvg's essay on the purple header could be helpful in 7.14?

gdpr7314264727b19c01a53ed58b

Sliverus wrote:
(#7535)
Do you think @jvvg's essay on the purple header could be helpful in 7.14?

Would make sense in all ways, and perhaps a short explanation of WCAG.
Scratch targets worldwide as educational so they gotta follow WCAG.
Incase it could be useful I'll link a post by ajskateboarder here.

Last edited by gdpr7314264727b19c01a53ed58b (July 3, 2023 16:54:45)

greentreebee

e

Paddle2See wrote:
StrangeMagic32 wrote:
Increase Clone Limit
possibly rejected?
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/375856/
Harakou wrote:
Please don't bump up old threads unless it's really necessary. The clone limit we've added is a practical one to prevent projects from becoming unplayable. Otherwise, you could accidentally get sprites making infinite copies of themselves and such.
Yeah, I think that's rejected.

*eye twitches*
though, thats fair, because wouldn't it make scratch way more buggier?

Last edited by greentreebee (July 5, 2023 15:53:58)

medians

greentreebee wrote:
e
Paddle2See wrote:
StrangeMagic32 wrote:
Increase Clone Limit
possibly rejected?
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/375856/
Harakou wrote:
Please don't bump up old threads unless it's really necessary. The clone limit we've added is a practical one to prevent projects from becoming unplayable. Otherwise, you could accidentally get sprites making infinite copies of themselves and such.
Yeah, I think that's rejected.
*eye twitches*

The “301” that someone added above shows this topic was definitely old LOL

Sliverus wrote:
Do you think @jvvg's essay on the purple header could be helpful in 7.14?

Yeah I guess.

Za-Chary wrote:
Done, thanks. I figured I used ( ) to make it more consistent with how 3.0 blocks look, but the comment block displayed in 1.12 also uses [ ], so whatever.

Wait, are text inputs now round?? What about number ones?

greentreebee

is there a topic about choosing your colors from purple to anything?

gdpr7314264727b19c01a53ed58b

greentreebee wrote:
(#7539)
is there a topic about choosing your colors from purple to anything?

Of course there is.

greentreebee

Zydrolic wrote:
greentreebee wrote:
(#7539)
is there a topic about choosing your colors from purple to anything?
Of course there is.

\wow just like a week later, i bet there like more than 100,000 comments complaining about the color contrast from blue to piurple. im one of them lol

Elijah999999

greentreebee wrote:
is there a topic about choosing your colors from purple to anything?

It's only been duplicated thousands of times.

Discuss Scratch