They Should Add A 3D Extention To Scratch Because It Would Open A Huge Swarm Of Ideas And It Would Make Making 3D Games Easier Do you Agree?

Its rejected. https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/343602/ (Find 1.7)

3D sounds complicated, so no, just get unity or clickteam fusion with firefly if you want to make 3d games (unity is free so do that one instead)

BouBouTests wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/694026/

DO NOT ADVERTISE

Under Section 1.7, I quote:

TOLORS wrote:

1.7 3D Scratch

This block, and others, could be used with a z-axis in the project stage to make it easier to create 3D projects. But, Scratch is a language that is designed to be as easy as possible for beginners to learn. Adding 3D features would make the language more difficult for beginners to understand, and a 3D engine is not exactly the purpose of Scratch. This suggestion also includes the possibility for virtual-reality features in Scratch, or “Scratch VR.” A lot of the same difficulties come up.

For those who are interested, it may be worth checking out Beetle Blocks or CreatiCode. They are block-based programming languages similar to the Scratch editor, but with 3D features. There is another similar program to Scratch that contains block programming with 3D features, called Starlogo TNG. You can also try Alice; it is not exactly like Scratch, but has some similar features.

Man That Sucks!