Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » ≥ and ≤ in operators
- garnetluvcookie
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Mobile people are alive. Support. Maybe a right-click option instead of a whole new block.
- Maximouse
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Can't you just long press instead?Mobile people are alive. Support. Maybe a right-click option instead of a whole new block.
- ninjaMAR
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Same Support. This wouldn't be very complicated at all, and if >= is too complicated, that by that same logic sin() and cos() is also to complicated. This would also be very useful.
- coins_and_gems
- Scratcher
67 posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
For Your Custom Blocks:
[category] hat::#2468ac hat
Control::control
Custom::custom
Events::events
Extension::extension
Grey::grey
Inputs [string](number::#bababa)<boolean::#bababa>[dropdown v v]::#ccc
List::list
Looks::looks
Motion::motion
Operators::operators
Pen::pen
Red::red
Sensing::sensing
Sound::sound
Variables::variables
#2468ac::#2468ac
[category] cap::#2468ac cap
Last edited by coins_and_gems (June 2, 2020 17:24:31)
Can you please ♥ and ★ this project so it doesn't get deleted? If you don't, it will be gone by 2023!
- coder2045
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Please try to be constructive. For Your Custom Blocks:[category] hat::#2468ac hat
Control::control
Custom::custom
Events::events
Extension::extension
Grey::grey
Inputs [string](number::#bababa)<boolean::#bababa>[dropdown v v]::#ccc
List::list
Looks::looks
Motion::motion
Operators::operators
Pen::pen
Red::red
Sensing::sensing
Sound::sound
Variables::variables
#2468ac::#2468ac
[category] cap::#2468ac cap
Anyway, for the 3rd time,
<not <[...] < [...]>> //>=There's your workaround.
Highlight this text and press Ctrl-Shift-Down to view more of my signature. There's a lot in there.
I FOUND THE POSTIE POSTIE POST LINK THIS
Brainteaser: What comes next? Answer on my profile. First correct answer gets a follow.
[ ]
[ [ ] ]
[ [ [ ] ] [ ] ]
Good projects ⬇️
- DarthVader4Life
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
I personally agree with this. I'd personally prefer a block that looks like this.<[] [= v] [] :: operators>The dropdown menu would have =, <, >, and yes, ≥ and ≤. It would be a simple replacement for the already existing variables, and there wouldn't be any confusion.
Ten posts left.
but yes, there are easy workarounds, but the
wait until <>has a one block workaround,
repeat until <>and they still have the wait until.
end
Last edited by DarthVader4Life (June 25, 2021 00:56:57)
Be Moist Also, here's a helpful link to Ocular
I am DV4L, Erector of Text Walls, Typer of Long Posts, Creator of Mini-mod posts
The kumquats have eaten this line, so I have to have a new way to repel them.
Had a bad day or are feeling bored? Watch this to make your day better in an interesting way.
Do you think you've been banned unfairly? Then you'd be wrong. The ST aren't children, so quit acting like they are.
I am DV4L, Erector of Text Walls, Typer of Long Posts, Creator of Mini-mod posts
The kumquats have eaten this line, so I have to have a new way to repel them.
Had a bad day or are feeling bored? Watch this to make your day better in an interesting way.
Do you think you've been banned unfairly? Then you'd be wrong. The ST aren't children, so quit acting like they are.
- HTML-Fan
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
You can just use
<not <(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)>>instead of
<(x :: grey) ≤ (y :: grey) :: operators>No support, too easy workaround.
Joke of the century: Just made a good remix of this with Scratch's music extension.
BE MOIST B) AND CHECK OUT
_____ ______ _ _
|_ _| | _ (_) (_)
| |_ _____ | | | |_ _ __ ___ ___ _ __ ___ _ ___ _ __ ___ #RoadToMoist100
| \ \ /\ / / _ \ | | | | | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ '_ \/ __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __|
| |\ V V / (_) | | |/ /| | | | | | | __/ | | \__ \ | (_) | | | \__ \
\_/ \_/\_/ \___/ |___/ |_|_| |_| |_|\___|_| |_|___/_|\___/|_| |_|___/
- DarthVader4Life
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Read the quote below. You can just use<not <(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)>>instead of<(x :: grey) ≤ (y :: grey) :: operators>No support, too easy workaround.
-snip-
but yes, there are easy workarounds, but thewait until <>has a one block workaround,repeat until <>and they still have the wait until
end
Last edited by DarthVader4Life (June 25, 2021 00:57:38)
Be Moist Also, here's a helpful link to Ocular
I am DV4L, Erector of Text Walls, Typer of Long Posts, Creator of Mini-mod posts
The kumquats have eaten this line, so I have to have a new way to repel them.
Had a bad day or are feeling bored? Watch this to make your day better in an interesting way.
Do you think you've been banned unfairly? Then you'd be wrong. The ST aren't children, so quit acting like they are.
I am DV4L, Erector of Text Walls, Typer of Long Posts, Creator of Mini-mod posts
The kumquats have eaten this line, so I have to have a new way to repel them.
Had a bad day or are feeling bored? Watch this to make your day better in an interesting way.
Do you think you've been banned unfairly? Then you'd be wrong. The ST aren't children, so quit acting like they are.
- BlueStarPort
- Scratcher
100+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Support. This helps save a bit of time making a workaround, and it's useful for games where you have to get a set score.
- -InsanityPlays-
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Workaround. Do
<(this is the workaround) > [5]>instead of
<<(this is the long way) = [6]> or <(this is the long way) > [6]>>.
Last edited by -InsanityPlays- (July 4, 2020 10:54:52)
Welcome to my signature!
I've moved accounts. Anyway, did this post help you? Go follow me on my new account!
Today's Links: Scratch 4.0 Leaked Information, Astronomical - The Third, The Forum Community
follow me on scratch or i am sad, subscribe to my YouTube channel or bad luck for the rest of your life
My Final Shoutout: hekcer because in computer science class, he is the hekcerman
-InsanityPlays- Fan Studio! (closed) | Astronomical - The Third | Best of -InsanityPlays- 2020
my channel, my website, ctrl+shift+down for more STUFF
I've moved accounts. Anyway, did this post help you? Go follow me on my new account!
Today's Links: Scratch 4.0 Leaked Information, Astronomical - The Third, The Forum Community
follow me on scratch or i am sad, subscribe to my YouTube channel or bad luck for the rest of your life
My Final Shoutout: hekcer because in computer science class, he is the hekcerman
-InsanityPlays- Fan Studio! (closed) | Astronomical - The Third | Best of -InsanityPlays- 2020
my channel, my website, ctrl+shift+down for more STUFF
2020's Advent Collection:
more STUFF
- Nambaseking01
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Support.
Special < and > tags get used a lot in different programming languages, and I feel like this should be referenced since Scratch is like a “start to different languages”. Additionally, it would just be useful because it's annoying to always choose the number lower than the one you need for things like shops.
Special < and > tags get used a lot in different programming languages, and I feel like this should be referenced since Scratch is like a “start to different languages”. Additionally, it would just be useful because it's annoying to always choose the number lower than the one you need for things like shops.
Hey there! My name is Nammy. I'm a male Forum Helper and Scratch Wiki Editor.
Profile | Test Account | Talk with me here! | Griffpatch is quitting Scratch?!
Profile | Test Account | Talk with me here! | Griffpatch is quitting Scratch?!
- BlueStarPort
- Scratcher
100+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
(deleted) Workaround. Do<(this is the workaround) > [5]>instead of<<(this is the long way) = [6]> or <(this is the long way) > [6]>>.
Last edited by BlueStarPort (July 4, 2020 23:16:06)
- HTML-Fan
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Much easier: Workaround. Do<(this is the workaround) > [5]>instead of<<(this is the long way) = [6]> or <(this is the long way) > [6]>>.
You can just use<not <(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)>>instead of<(x :: grey) ≤ (y :: grey) :: operators>
Joke of the century: Just made a good remix of this with Scratch's music extension.
BE MOIST B) AND CHECK OUT
_____ ______ _ _
|_ _| | _ (_) (_)
| |_ _____ | | | |_ _ __ ___ ___ _ __ ___ _ ___ _ __ ___ #RoadToMoist100
| \ \ /\ / / _ \ | | | | | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ '_ \/ __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __|
| |\ V V / (_) | | |/ /| | | | | | | __/ | | \__ \ | (_) | | | \__ \
\_/ \_/\_/ \___/ |___/ |_|_| |_| |_|\___|_| |_|___/_|\___/|_| |_|___/
- fdreerf
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
That workaround requires an additional block.Much easier: Workaround. Do
-
instead of
-You can just use
-
instead of
-
Hyped for MS-DOS 11.0
- HTML-Fan
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
Yes, but you don't have to duplicate (This is the long way). -snip-
That workaround requires an additional block.
Joke of the century: Just made a good remix of this with Scratch's music extension.
BE MOIST B) AND CHECK OUT
_____ ______ _ _
|_ _| | _ (_) (_)
| |_ _____ | | | |_ _ __ ___ ___ _ __ ___ _ ___ _ __ ___ #RoadToMoist100
| \ \ /\ / / _ \ | | | | | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ '_ \/ __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __|
| |\ V V / (_) | | |/ /| | | | | | | __/ | | \__ \ | (_) | | | \__ \
\_/ \_/\_/ \___/ |___/ |_|_| |_| |_|\___|_| |_|___/_|\___/|_| |_|___/
- fdreerf
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
?Yes, but you don't have to duplicate (This is the long way). -snip-
That workaround requires an additional block.
Hyped for MS-DOS 11.0
- HTML-Fan
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
<not <(x :: grey) < (y :: grey)>>is way shorter then
<<(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)> or <(x :: grey) = (y :: grey)>>
Joke of the century: Just made a good remix of this with Scratch's music extension.
BE MOIST B) AND CHECK OUT
_____ ______ _ _
|_ _| | _ (_) (_)
| |_ _____ | | | |_ _ __ ___ ___ _ __ ___ _ ___ _ __ ___ #RoadToMoist100
| \ \ /\ / / _ \ | | | | | '_ ` _ \ / _ \ '_ \/ __| |/ _ \| '_ \/ __|
| |\ V V / (_) | | |/ /| | | | | | | __/ | | \__ \ | (_) | | | \__ \
\_/ \_/\_/ \___/ |___/ |_|_| |_| |_|\___|_| |_|___/_|\___/|_| |_|___/
- fdreerf
- Scratcher
1000+ posts
≥ and ≤ in operators
I'm aware. That's why they suggested to just do<not <(x :: grey) < (y :: grey)>>is way shorter then<<(x :: grey) > (y :: grey)> or <(x :: grey) = (y :: grey)>>
<(x :: grey) > (y - 1:: grey)>which is mathematically incorrect.
Hyped for MS-DOS 11.0