Scratch for Adults!

Blaze349

TimothyLawyer wrote:
Blaze349 wrote:
No it wasn't. It just had a few disadvantages. I recommend Xcode.
Or Swift.

I said Xcode not Obj-C because I know about swift.

astro-mechanic

Blaze349 wrote:
TimothyLawyer wrote:
Blaze349 wrote:
No it wasn't. It just had a few disadvantages. I recommend Xcode.
Or Swift.
I said Xcode not Obj-C because I know about swift.

Xcode only works on Apple stuff though.

(Swift is a part of Xcode.)

Last edited by astro-mechanic (Aug. 22, 2014 08:57:41)

Blaze349

astro-mechanic wrote:
Blaze349 wrote:
TimothyLawyer wrote:
Blaze349 wrote:
No it wasn't. It just had a few disadvantages. I recommend Xcode.
Or Swift.
I said Xcode not Obj-C because I know about swift.
Xcode only works on Apple stuff though. (Swift is a part of Xcode.)

I know, perfect right? Cause more people will ditch windows for os x…

VoltageGames

Blaze349 wrote:
MasterDueler wrote:
ok, maybe it was a bad idea
No it wasn't. It just had a few disadvantages. I recommend Xcode.

I seriously hope you one day understand Xcode is an IDE and not a language.

Blueinkproductions

Objective-C is not just for Apple stuff. Cocoa (and Cocoa touch) are libraries that are used for iOS and OSX, but Objective-C itself is not just an Apple thing.

VoltageGames

Blueinkproductions wrote:
Objective-C is not just for Apple stuff. Cocoa (and Cocoa touch) are libraries that are used for iOS and OSX, but Objective-C itself is not just an Apple thing.

I'm assuming here you meant to quote my previous post.
Yes, you can write in O-C and Cocoa on XCode, but XCode is for coding on, not for coding with, as if to make a game from “Xcode”

Do you ever hear this? “This game was written in the programming language xcode”

Blueinkproductions

VoltageGames wrote:
Blueinkproductions wrote:
Objective-C is not just for Apple stuff. Cocoa (and Cocoa touch) are libraries that are used for iOS and OSX, but Objective-C itself is not just an Apple thing.
I'm assuming here you meant to quote my previous post.
Yes, you can write in O-C and Cocoa on XCode, but XCode is for coding on, not for coding with, as if to make a game from “Xcode”

I was planning on quoting but was to lazy.

Do you ever hear this? “This game was written in the programming language xcode”

XD No, I have not heard that. I also know what XCode is, but I was replying to AM, who said that Obj-C was just for Apple stuff.

imadrainpipe

This sounds like an excuse for adult content.
Also, as many have said, use SNAP! (formerly BYOB)

Braeden5454

The WNTS sticky wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.

VoltageGames

Braeden5454 wrote:
The WNTS sticky wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.

IT'S FOR ADVANCED SCRIPTING, NOT ALLOWING OBSCENITIES. GEEZ. DID YOU EVEN READ THE OPENING POST?

TheHockeyist

VoltageGames wrote:
Braeden5454 wrote:
The WNTS sticky wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.
IT'S FOR ADVANCED SCRIPTING, NOT ALLOWING OBSCENITIES. GEEZ. DID YOU EVEN READ THE OPENING POST?

Might I recommend calming down before this gets heated?

VoltageGames

TheHockeyist wrote:
VoltageGames wrote:
Braeden5454 wrote:
The WNTS sticky wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.
IT'S FOR ADVANCED SCRIPTING, NOT ALLOWING OBSCENITIES. GEEZ. DID YOU EVEN READ THE OPENING POST?

Might I recommend calming down before this gets heated?

Sorry, it just really burns me when someone posts before reading the opening post. Happens a lot.

Braeden5454

VoltageGames wrote:
Braeden5454 wrote:
The WNTS sticky wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.
IT'S FOR ADVANCED SCRIPTING, NOT ALLOWING OBSCENITIES. GEEZ. DID YOU EVEN READ THE OPENING POST?

-removed for overreacting on my part-
Im sorry, next time I will try to read the posts before mine.

Last edited by Braeden5454 (Aug. 22, 2014 19:28:00)

TheHockeyist

Braeden5454 wrote:
VoltageGames wrote:
Braeden5454 wrote:
The WNTS sticky wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.
IT'S FOR ADVANCED SCRIPTING, NOT ALLOWING OBSCENITIES. GEEZ. DID YOU EVEN READ THE OPENING POST?
-removed for overreacting on my part-
Im sorry, next time I will try to read the posts before mine.

-removed-

Last edited by TheHockeyist (Aug. 22, 2014 19:30:22)

samanyolu

MasterDueler wrote:
I think there should be a scratch for adults, just like Scratch Junior, it will be harder, instead of being easier.

No support

gregory9

KingOfAwesome58219 wrote:
That wouldn't happen; the ST has already decided no.
On the jvvg's list of things that scratch will not be included, it said:
jvvg wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.
So sorry, no support

I aggree, so no support.

lalala3

gregory9 wrote:
KingOfAwesome58219 wrote:
That wouldn't happen; the ST has already decided no.
On the jvvg's list of things that scratch will not be included, it said:
jvvg wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.
So sorry, no support
I aggree, so no support.

I refer you to post #30. Please learn to read the entire thread before posting.

cheeseeater

Blaze349 wrote:
Cause more people will ditch windows for os x…

{OFFTOPIC]Woah, I can't use apple stuff, its all shiny and corporate.

Go Linux and Windows!

{/OFFTOPIC]

Anyways, my opinion is that if you want to program in a more ‘advanced’ environment, try Python, Java, or a different ‘flavor’ of scratch. (mods)

SuperSmashScratch

lalala3 wrote:
gregory9 wrote:
KingOfAwesome58219 wrote:
That wouldn't happen; the ST has already decided no.
On the jvvg's list of things that scratch will not be included, it said:
jvvg wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.
So sorry, no support
I aggree, so no support.
I refer you to post #30. Please learn to read the entire thread before posting.

I think you need to calm down. Your post there was… rather condescending. Anyway, does jvvg say anything about obscenities? No. He meant advanced scripting most likely.

lalala3

SuperSmashScratch wrote:
lalala3 wrote:
gregory9 wrote:
KingOfAwesome58219 wrote:
That wouldn't happen; the ST has already decided no.
On the jvvg's list of things that scratch will not be included, it said:
jvvg wrote:
14. A 13+ version of the website
Scratch is designed for all ages, and dividing the community would not really help anybody.
So sorry, no support
I aggree, so no support.
I refer you to post #30. Please learn to read the entire thread before posting.
I think you need to calm down. Your post there was… rather condescending. Anyway, does jvvg say anything about obscenities? No. He meant advanced scripting most likely.

I am perfectly calm. I was simply stating that someone who hasn't read through a discussion thread should not post in that thread. As for the content in the quote, jvvg's wording (“13+”, “all ages”, and “dividing the community”) indicates that he means the former as opposed to the latter. It has no relevance to the topic of advanced scripting.

Discuss Scratch