The complete list of rejected suggestions - PLEASE READ BEFORE MAKING A TOPIC

LionHeart70

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:
LionHeart70 wrote:
TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:
31: Removing the suggestions forum:
This forum is helpful for users to share what they think could be improved about the site, and just because some parts of it seem useless or spam generating doesn't mean the whole forum should be removed.

Haha, if that were actually accepted, then their suggestion will get removed.
Yeah, I guess maybe I should expand this to “removing any forum”?
Let's ask the great ol' Paddle.

Sounds good.

LionHeart70

Added a new one, “Banning certain franchises”.
Can't tell if it's rejected or not, but I've seen a few posts about “Ban (franchise)” that were closed by the ST with an explanation on how they won't ban franchises in most cases.

ForgotMyUsernameXD

An option to make 13+ games and block them for certain users would be a great idea to help make it so older kids can express their creativity and not worry about younger kids being badly effected by it.

Overall that is a great idea especially considering I make games with mild gore in them and that would be a great way to make sure that no younger kids are scarred.

ScratchDiogoh

ForgotMyUsernameXD wrote:
An option to make 13+ games and block them for certain users would be a great idea to help make it so older kids can express their creativity and not worry about younger kids being badly effected by it.

Overall that is a great idea especially considering I make games with mild gore in them and that would be a great way to make sure that no younger kids are scarred.

this is a suggestion the purpose this, topic is the suggestions rejected

LionHeart70

ForgotMyUsernameXD wrote:
An option to make 13+ games and block them for certain users would be a great idea to help make it so older kids can express their creativity and not worry about younger kids being badly effected by it.

Overall that is a great idea especially considering I make games with mild gore in them and that would be a great way to make sure that no younger kids are scarred.

Uhh.. did you even read the whole thing?
That's a rejected suggestion that I wasn't even suggesting. I'm listing rejected suggestions here.

PrincessFlowerTV

Where is Collaborating?

ScratchDiogoh

PrincessFlowerTV wrote:
Where is Collaborating?

Why?

LionHeart70

PrincessFlowerTV wrote:
Where is Collaborating?

I think that's what “live editing” (or something along those lines) is. I might change it, though.

adsuri

Are

<mouse touching [#728282]? :: sensing>

&

(mouse location color :: sensing)

rejected?

Last edited by adsuri (Aug. 15, 2018 20:55:25)

LionHeart70

adsuri wrote:

Are

<mouse touching [#728282]? :: sensing>

&

<mouse location color :: sensing>

rejected?

I'm not sure.

(it took me a solid few minutes to realize that you weren't paddle oh my–)

adsuri

LionHeart70 wrote:
adsuri wrote:
Are
<mouse touching [#728282]? :: sensing>
&
<mouse location color :: sensing>
rejected?
I'm not sure.

(it took me a solid few minutes to realize that you weren't paddle oh my–)

I did that to mess up people & you were the second!

adsuri

----WindowsXD----- wrote:
289228-90882-8222 (an test to see if phone number censor works)

897-987-9878 (fake)
Did it work?

LionHeart70

----WindowsXD----- wrote:
289228-90882-8222 (an test to see if phone number censor works)

It doesn't detect it on the forums.

LionHeart70

Has anyone found a reason that 27 and 28 were rejected yet?

hermandise345

LionHeart70 wrote:
Bump, I guess?

What's a bump?

TheAdriCoolManDude

I don't know if this is the reason why, but the reason removing studio activity is rejected might be because some people want to see studio activity, and it sometimes might be important. If you don't want studio activity, ignore those messages.
That is the best thing I can think of.

GizzyGazzy360

I believe that cloud lists have also been rejected but I can't really find anywhere to back this up.

LionHeart70

GizzyGazzy360 wrote:
I believe that cloud lists have also been rejected but I can't really find anywhere to back this up.

I don't know. I think it was rejected a while ago, but now not anymore, and I think I heard they're actually planning on adding them.

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:
I don't know if this is the reason why, but the reason removing studio activity is rejected might be because some people want to see studio activity, and it sometimes might be important. If you don't want studio activity, ignore those messages.
That is the best thing I can think of.

Possibly. I also heard somewhere that it's actually not rejected, but I'm still keeping it up there for now until I get some verification.

hermandise345 wrote:
LionHeart70 wrote:
Bump, I guess?
What's a bump?

A post on a topic to bring it back up to the top (commonly done after the last post was at least a day ago and it's off the first page), but this was before the topic was stickied - now it's always at the top and I don't need to do that anymore!

ScratchDiogoh

ScratchDiogoh wrote:
is that moderating mini-mods would cause more hassle to the scratch team, and in fact should for the owner, even if they are mini-mods

red_king_cyclops

I infer that post count suggestions are rejected. My proof is here: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/315314/

Discuss Scratch