FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)

Scratchingthecode97

Nextor wrote:
Scratchingthecode97 wrote:
Nextor wrote:
Nextor wrote:
Scratchingthecode97 wrote:
Nextor wrote:
Scratchingthecode97 wrote:
Nextor wrote:
Scratchingthecode97 wrote:
Nextor wrote:
I think the Marionette was intended to be a female character because, well, look at her body. You can clearly see a largely sized pelvis area (Fun fact: that's how archaeologists determine the gender of a skeleton; the size of the pelvis), a thin stomach area, and a projected… well, I don't want to get muted by saying that, but you probably know what I'm talking about. Besides, Chica/Toy Chica were the only genuinely female characters in the game, while everyone else was male. I think Scott was trying to be anti-sexist by making the Marionette, the most iconic character in the series, a female.
The puppet's pelvis isn't like toy chica's where you can tell that it is female. Also, if you mean what I think you mean… well…huh? There's nothing to it, and it seems to be gender neutral.

Might as well say this, but I'm not targeting your theories. I just see whatever's on here and respond sometimes, while other times I work on stuff.
I hacked the original FNAF2 files, so I know I'm right in her shape. And I've been to 6th grade, so I know that the whole archaeology reference was correct.
And I looked up the actual image on google (http://orig13.deviantart.net/2875/f/2014/318/a/5/full_view_of_marionette_by_freddythefazbear-d86du6a.png). No matter if you went into the files or just looked it up (and knew what you were looking for), we're looking at the same image. Also, did I say the reference was incorrect? I only said the reference applied to the Puppet doesn't seem to work. Although, I guess it's hard to tell with a stature like that…
Really? All I see is an OOPS page saying it doesn't exist.
Well of course it got deleted. It was this image:
See what I mean? It's kind of obvious. the pelvis and chest areas are both elognated and the waistline is all squished in. It's ruled by a vengeful soul, so yeah.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Plz click dis URL
VVVVVVVVVVV
Also note the white face. In Elizabethan times, a woman was deemed beautiful if she had a strikingly white face; it was a sign of nobility. The marionette is kind of the puppet master over the animatronics, sort of their queen. She is the reason the animatronics fought against the purple man. She was the one that truly wanted vengeance. Essentially, the Marionette is the Elizabethan queen of Freddy Fazbear's Pizza.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Plz click dis URL
VVVVVVVVVVV
If you look at the structure of the Marionette, the legs make it impossible for the pelvis to be any smaller. And the Marionette is most likely hooked on or controlled in the chest area, so they had to make it big enough to control it. Plus, the Elizabethan thing isn't relevant. This is a video game, not a Shakespeare play.

It's symbolic, not literal. Pretty much everything in FNAF is a symbol for something else. Besides, have you SEEN a puppet before? The strings are NEVER attached to the chest; they're always attached to the arms, legs and head. Never the CHEST.

Look at prize corner. There is only one string (or rail?) and it is most likely attached to the torso. Also, I know that, still It wasn't supposed to be meant literally, I'm saying that Scott wouldn't have wanted us to use stuff from Elizabethan times to support a gender. Scott doesn't even really care about genders anyway.

kitty1killer5

flappy445 wrote:
kitty1killer5 wrote:
Okay guys. Here's my theory:

Fnaf 4: The kid you play as is purple guy's son. He was stuffed into the fredbear suit by the four kids wearing the masks. Purple guy got angry.

Fnaf 2: Purple guy is a hired worker. He notices the four kids and decides to get revenge. He stuffs them into the old suits in the parts and services room.

Fnaf 1: the suits are fixed to what the originally looked like. Purple guy is hired as the phone guy. On Night 4, you know that phone guy was killed, right? So I think this is what happend: The minigame on night 5 in fnaf 3 was the event that happend to phone guys desk. I think the springtrap suit was laying in the back of the room the whole time. He was stuffed and the kids were free

fnaf 3: everything goes the same

Sister Location: By the looks on the trailers, all the animictronics have speakers on them. None of the animictronics had speakers in the previous games. So this game is probally taking place after the 4 games. Also, in the trailer, you can see that you find youself in two rooms: A control room of some sort and a circle room that looks like an elevator. The control room has more buttons than the previous offices. This is another reason why it is in the future.

Also, thumbs up if you like my profile pic!

Well, im not saying your theory is bad.. But why would the “son” of purple guy be scared of FredBear? He should be used to the diner. Also, phone guy has nothing to do with purple guy. In FNaF 3 purple guy would be dead, thus curroupting his sons' mind and disrupting his timeline. In FNaF 4 why would purple guy's son not cry and run to him as if he was a really good father. In FNaF 1, phone guy dies just like a player would in the game.

First of all, have you seen the miniclips between the nights of FNaF 4? For some strange reason, the kid always lays under the table and crys alot. I have no idea why. Second, even if the phone guy wasnt purple guy, how did he get into the suit? First of all, it couldnt have been in FNaF 2, because the order of the series is 4,2,1,3 and the phone guy was killed in fnaf 1. Also, the phone guy mentions about a diffrent guy doing the shift before. When purple guy got fired for messing with the animictronics, he became…dun,dun,dun,dun!!!!! Phone Guy!!! so it couldnt have been in FNaF 2. Second, The phone guy in FNaF 1 never says ANYTHING about a guy and the springtrap suit. So it had to be in that same game.

Scratchingthecode97

kitty1killer5 wrote:
flappy445 wrote:
kitty1killer5 wrote:
Okay guys. Here's my theory:

Fnaf 4: The kid you play as is purple guy's son. He was stuffed into the fredbear suit by the four kids wearing the masks. Purple guy got angry.

Fnaf 2: Purple guy is a hired worker. He notices the four kids and decides to get revenge. He stuffs them into the old suits in the parts and services room.

Fnaf 1: the suits are fixed to what the originally looked like. Purple guy is hired as the phone guy. On Night 4, you know that phone guy was killed, right? So I think this is what happend: The minigame on night 5 in fnaf 3 was the event that happend to phone guys desk. I think the springtrap suit was laying in the back of the room the whole time. He was stuffed and the kids were free

fnaf 3: everything goes the same

Sister Location: By the looks on the trailers, all the animictronics have speakers on them. None of the animictronics had speakers in the previous games. So this game is probally taking place after the 4 games. Also, in the trailer, you can see that you find youself in two rooms: A control room of some sort and a circle room that looks like an elevator. The control room has more buttons than the previous offices. This is another reason why it is in the future.

Also, thumbs up if you like my profile pic!

Well, im not saying your theory is bad.. But why would the “son” of purple guy be scared of FredBear? He should be used to the diner. Also, phone guy has nothing to do with purple guy. In FNaF 3 purple guy would be dead, thus curroupting his sons' mind and disrupting his timeline. In FNaF 4 why would purple guy's son not cry and run to him as if he was a really good father. In FNaF 1, phone guy dies just like a player would in the game.

First of all, have you seen the miniclips between the nights of FNaF 4? For some strange reason, the kid always lays under the table and crys alot. I have no idea why. Second, even if the phone guy wasnt purple guy, how did he get into the suit? First of all, it couldnt have been in FNaF 2, because the order of the series is 4,2,1,3 and the phone guy was killed in fnaf 1. Also, the phone guy mentions about a diffrent guy doing the shift before. When purple guy got fired for messing with the animictronics, he became…dun,dun,dun,dun!!!!! Phone Guy!!! so it couldnt have been in FNaF 2. Second, The phone guy in FNaF 1 never says ANYTHING about a guy and the springtrap suit. So it had to be in that same game.
*sigh*
Possible Confirmation?
No.

kitty1killer5

HE SAID ALMOST!!! HE SAID ALMOST! It doesn't mean that my theory was wrong!!!

Scratchingthecode97

kitty1killer5 wrote:
HE SAID ALMOST!!! HE SAID ALMOST! It doesn't mean that my theory was wrong!!!

He literally drew attention to almost in response to the “confirmation”. It is deconfirmed.

Drake1337

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:
Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.

No, It was golden Freddy, it was 83, because Freddy Fazbears denied it happened. Plus in the last mini game in fnaf 4 Golden bit the kid.

Supergreat901

I have a pretty cool statement here.
The original and the withered/unwithered (which are 2 different types) animatronics have 2 souls haunting them.
*dun dun duuun*
Yes. They have 2 souls. And they are explained via the Phantom animatronics.
Firstly, the Phantoms look different than the tooth-shaped ghosts that we know and love.
And secondly, they act different.
Why would they kill the Fnaf 3 nightguard?
Because Springtrap (AKA the Purple Guy) ordered them to.
And only 6 joined them. BB, Withered Freddy, Chica, Withered Foxy, Mangle, and the Puppet.
BB, Mangle and the Puppet because reasons.
And it might be a possibility that the Nightmares and the Phantoms are the same too.

Scratchingthecode97

Supergreat901 wrote:
I have a pretty cool statement here.
The original and the withered/unwithered (which are 2 different types) animatronics have 2 souls haunting them.
*dun dun duuun*
Yes. They have 2 souls. And they are explained via the Phantom animatronics.
Firstly, the Phantoms look different than the tooth-shaped ghosts that we know and love.
And secondly, they act different.
Why would they kill the Fnaf 3 nightguard?
Because Springtrap (AKA the Purple Guy) ordered them to.
And only 6 joined them. BB, Withered Freddy, Chica, Withered Foxy, Mangle, and the Puppet.
BB, Mangle and the Puppet because reasons.
And it might be a possibility that the Nightmares and the Phantoms are the same too.

One thing though, they don't kill the night guard at all. And I don't think the kids would listen to purple guy at all. They likely came back for a different reason, to convince the security guard to burn it down. Ever wondered why the look so burnt? Also, the nightmares (except possibly nightmare) don't exist in reality. They are what they are, nightmares.

JimdigrisIsAwesome

Ha FNAF? I Love it. Nice theory 10/10

foxysHOOK

I have a theory that “shadow freddy” is older than fredbear and spring bonnie and the reason hes just a shadow is because he completely rotted away but still exists a nothing but a halucination.

FnafMaster_3

grumpybear497 wrote:
that is true[did you know the most people like foxy the most

computer_tron

FnafMaster_3 wrote:
grumpybear497 wrote:
that is true[did you know the most people like foxy the most
FOXY IS THE BEST!!!!

Last edited by computer_tron (June 12, 2016 19:15:12)

Scratchingthecode97

New teaser! SpookyDooky!

Nextor

kitty1killer5 wrote:
flappy445 wrote:
kitty1killer5 wrote:
Okay guys. Here's my theory:

Fnaf 4: The kid you play as is purple guy's son. He was stuffed into the fredbear suit by the four kids wearing the masks. Purple guy got angry.

Fnaf 2: Purple guy is a hired worker. He notices the four kids and decides to get revenge. He stuffs them into the old suits in the parts and services room.

Fnaf 1: the suits are fixed to what the originally looked like. Purple guy is hired as the phone guy. On Night 4, you know that phone guy was killed, right? So I think this is what happend: The minigame on night 5 in fnaf 3 was the event that happend to phone guys desk. I think the springtrap suit was laying in the back of the room the whole time. He was stuffed and the kids were free

fnaf 3: everything goes the same

Sister Location: By the looks on the trailers, all the animictronics have speakers on them. None of the animictronics had speakers in the previous games. So this game is probally taking place after the 4 games. Also, in the trailer, you can see that you find youself in two rooms: A control room of some sort and a circle room that looks like an elevator. The control room has more buttons than the previous offices. This is another reason why it is in the future.

Also, thumbs up if you like my profile pic!

Well, im not saying your theory is bad.. But why would the “son” of purple guy be scared of FredBear? He should be used to the diner. Also, phone guy has nothing to do with purple guy. In FNaF 3 purple guy would be dead, thus curroupting his sons' mind and disrupting his timeline. In FNaF 4 why would purple guy's son not cry and run to him as if he was a really good father. In FNaF 1, phone guy dies just like a player would in the game.
First of all, have you seen the miniclips between the nights of FNaF 4? For some strange reason, the kid always lays under the table and crys alot. I have no idea why. Second, even if the phone guy wasnt purple guy, how did he get into the suit? First of all, it couldnt have been in FNaF 2, because the order of the series is 4,2,1,3 and the phone guy was killed in fnaf 1. Also, the phone guy mentions about a diffrent guy doing the shift before. When purple guy got fired for messing with the animictronics, he became…dun,dun,dun,dun!!!!! Phone Guy!!! so it couldnt have been in FNaF 2. Second, The phone guy in FNaF 1 never says ANYTHING about a guy and the springtrap suit. So it had to be in that same game.

In the Night 3 minigame of FNAF4, and you try to go the other way (towards the show stage before the fredbear shows up), your little psychic friend says, ‘NO! Don’t you rememberwhat you saw? Clearly this child saw something horrible going on at the restaurant; perhaps the PURPLE GUY EASTER EGG ON THE SAME NIGHT! Remember, Scott said, ‘What is seen in the shadows is easily misunderstood in the mind of a child’. Do you know why Shadow Freddy and Purple Guy are both purple? It's because in Atari, the color for shadow is almost EXACTLY the same color as the Purple Man in the FNAF3 minigames! This child and his overactive imagination thought that he was witnessing a murder of a human being, NOT just some employee putting on a springlock suit and going about his daily business.
BOOM SHAKA LAKA, people. BOOM SHAKA LAKA.

Last edited by Nextor (June 18, 2016 11:53:16)

simpsoel2024

Drake1337 wrote:
puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:
Second: Which animatronic delivered the Bite?

Well, first of all, we know that it can't be Mangle, because he/she/it is too broken, and it can't be the Marionette because he/she/it doesn't exactly have a mouth, and it couldn't really have been any of the old animatronics because they were also too broken, especially Bonnie. She/he doesn't even HAVE A HEAD. It would've had to been one of the new animatronics, meaning Toy Freddy, Toy Bonnie, or Toy Chica. Since Toy Freddy and Bonnie don't have much in the way of something to actually deliver a severe enough bite to remove someone's frontal lobe, the most likely suspect is definitely Toy Chica.
No, It was golden Freddy, it was 83, because Freddy Fazbears denied it happened. Plus in the last mini game in fnaf 4 Golden bit the kid.

that was 83, but 87 WAS from mangle because he/she/it is the only one with a big enough mouth.SOOOOO…….. who got bit by mangle?Jeremy Fitzgerald!dun dun duuuuuuunnnnnn!oh jeremy is the character you play as nights 1 - 5 in fnaf 2.on the 6 and 7 night, you play as mike schmidt.
to learn more, watch game theory fnaf. it's very intreasting!(if you can stand to watch 11 fnaf videos in a row, that is.)

Scratchingthecode97

xX_Mrs_Pink_xX wrote:
Has anyone saw the new teaser for the sister location? that head looks like ballora's o-o

Yes, I even linked to it. But the clown nose and the fact that it doesn't have that “ hair” makes me think it isn't ballora's.

Nextor

xX_Mrs_Pink_xX wrote:
Scratchingthecode97 wrote:
xX_Mrs_Pink_xX wrote:
Has anyone saw the new teaser for the sister location? that head looks like ballora's o-o
Yes, I even linked to it. But the clown nose and the fact that it doesn't have that “ hair” makes me think it isn't ballora's.
I don't really think it is ballora either. but the next teaser might be funtime foxy or something.

To me, it looks more like the Mangle than anything else. You can clearly see that half the face is missing, and there appears to be lacking any sort of ‘body’. Instead, you have a writhing mass of tentacle-y stuff; and what appears to be another head behind the first one.

herobrine190

……. hai im back

sc380010033404

New theory! Everything in all of the games is just a dream and the pizzeria doesn't even exist…

herobrine190

sc380010033404 wrote:
New theory! Everything in all of the games is just a dream and the pizzeria doesn't even exist…

sadly, that is possible true because there is something big that I can show you… But it will show the truth.

Discuss Scratch