So, me and my brother are planning a collaboration. However, we are deciding; when we share the project, what will we do?
We could:
-Share it on only one profile and credit the other person
-Share it on two profiles and ask for people to heart/star both
However, each of those has their cons. For the first one, if someone hearts/stars the project, the other person won't know, as it techingaclly isn't their project. For the second idea, its not a guarantee that people will love both.

Ok, enough with the chatting. My idea is that, similar to this idea, there should be an “add collaborate button” (which only the host can do) When the project is shared, the title page would say, as an example:
“Test Project-Collab” by @LionCoder10 and @username
Now, when someone hearts, stars, or comments on a project, it sends a message to both creators. Also, when the project is shared, on one of the collaborators activity, it could say something like “@username collaborated with @LionCoder10 to make ”Test Project-Collab“”
I hope this makes collabs more fair, and make sure that everyone gets proper credit.

Also, if a user is credited with a project, it would appear on their profile in a row labeled something like “Projects I Collaborated On”

EDIT: This is NOT a dupe! People keep saying it is a dupe of this. However, that topic suggests actual collaboration. This topic is about giving credit to people formally, and has nothing to do with implementing collaboration. This is supposed to be helpful so that, in a collab, people will be equally given credit. So, last time, THIS IS NOT A DUPE! Thanks for understanding.

Okay. First, it’s actually turn-based, and second, your suggestion is rejected, but not the turn-based one which I just talked about.

(^v^ :: motion) // Kumquat protector

when this sprite touches [mouse-pointer v] :: events hat

NotK3ndricAlt wrote:

Okay. First, it’s actually turn-based, and second, your suggestion is rejected, but not the turn-based one which I just talked about.

Wait, where is it rejected? I don't see it in TOLORS, but I may be wrong

LionCoder10 wrote:

Wait, where is it rejected? I don't see it in TOLORS, but I may be wrong

they're probably talking about this:

Za-Chary wrote:

2.1 Adding users to work on projects
Having multiple Scratchers work on the same project would be difficult to moderate not only due to technological limitations but also because it could lead to private messaging; for more information, see #7.1 on this list. This suggestion includes live editing (similar to Google Docs) and other forms of private collaboration. If you would like to work on a project with another Scratcher, you can remix each others' projects.

But, i don't see how this applies. This suggestion is about giving 2 people credit and notifications from a single project, not two people working in the project at the same time. I think this would be a nice feature as people don't always pay attention to other people who collaborated with you.
support

B…u…m…p? …

LionCoder10 wrote:

B…u…m…p? …

It's rejected. Reporting to be closed.

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

LionCoder10 wrote:

B…u…m…p? …

It's rejected. Reporting to be closed.

I don’t think that it is. This is just about giving credit.
sixty second rule

dinonugget- wrote:

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

LionCoder10 wrote:

B…u…m…p? …

It's rejected. Reporting to be closed.

I don’t think that it is. This is just about giving credit.
sixty second rule

The OP is suggesting collaboration, which is rejected

no. they are suggesting collab credits not what is rejected

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

dinonugget- wrote:

RethinkingVoxels wrote:

LionCoder10 wrote:

B…u…m…p? …

It's rejected. Reporting to be closed.

I don’t think that it is. This is just about giving credit.
sixty second rule

The OP is suggesting collaboration, which is rejected

yeah, I'm suggesting a way to easily give credit to people. This has nothing to do with making collabs, but sharing collabs

both users'd need to say they'd be apart of it so people don't just say they collab'd with griffpatch

the project should have to origanally be shared to collab, to avoid private chatting

subjectnamehere wrote:

both users'd need to say they'd be apart of it so people don't just say they collab'd with griffpatch

I said in the OP that only the host (in this case, griffpatch) could invite other collaborators. So people can't just randomly say they worked with someone; the other person would have to accept

LP372 wrote:

the project should have to origanally be shared to collab, to avoid private chatting

yeah, that makes sense

Bump
(JUST SO EVERYONE KNOWS, THIS IS NOT REJECTED AND IS NOT A DUPLICATE!) (sorry for caps lock)

LionCoder10 wrote:

Bump
(JUST SO EVERYONE KNOWS, THIS IS NOT REJECTED AND IS NOT A DUPLICATE!) (sorry for caps lock)

Bummmmpppppp

so you're basically adding some one to have credit with you?

Sounds really similar to this. Therefore…

This topic is a duplicate. Please continue discussing here to keep the discussion all in one place.

RecessFailsOffical wrote:

Sounds really similar to this. Therefore…

This topic is a duplicate. Please continue discussing here to keep the discussion all in one place.

BRUH READ THE OP

lol support it can give credit easily

OwO :: #44bd8d
^-^ :: #44bd8d

among_us1w2 wrote:

RecessFailsOffical wrote:

Sounds really similar to this. Therefore…

This topic is a duplicate. Please continue discussing here to keep the discussion all in one place.

BRUH READ THE OP

lol support it can give credit easily

READ THE OP OF THE DUPE POST IT'S LITERALLY THE SAME THING

RecessFailsOffical wrote:

Sounds really similar to this. Therefore…

This topic is a duplicate. Please continue discussing here to keep the discussion all in one place.

The link you're bringing up is the suggestion of collaborating
But my idea is just giving credit, at the END of a collab or remix-chain.

I am not suggestion collaboration, but giving credit for a collaboration