It started this day when i was seeing a project, but i saw something different. The love favorite remix and view icon were different. so i thought that scratch 4.0 will come out, but a few hours later. i saw the love and favorite icons have a outline. WHAT IS HAPPENING SCRATCH 4.0 COMING OUT SOON!!!!!!!

4.0 isn’t planned.
Its a new update for accessibility purposes.

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

4.0 isn’t planned.
Its a new update for accessibility purposes.

did you see those icons i told you
love, fav, remix, eye

BabyBellaBoor wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

4.0 isn’t planned.
Its a new update for accessibility purposes.

did you see those icons i told you
love, fav, remix, eye

I saw it

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued. 3.0 runs on a format that won’t be discontinued for a very long time, if ever. the scratch team has no reason to start from scratch (no pun intended) and make a new version. they’ll probably just keep updating 3.0 until it becomes easier/better to start over again, which won’t happen for at least a few years.

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued. 3.0 runs on a format that won’t be discontinued for a very long time, if ever. the scratch team has no reason to start from scratch (no pun intended) and make a new version. they’ll probably just keep updating 3.0 until it becomes easier/better to start over again, which won’t happen for at least a few years.

CAN YOU GO MAKE A PROJECT AND SEE THE LOVE AND FAV AND EYE AND REMIX ICONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BabyBellaBoor wrote:

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued. 3.0 runs on a format that won’t be discontinued for a very long time, if ever. the scratch team has no reason to start from scratch (no pun intended) and make a new version. they’ll probably just keep updating 3.0 until it becomes easier/better to start over again, which won’t happen for at least a few years.

CAN YOU GO MAKE A PROJECT AND SEE THE LOVE AND FAV AND EYE AND REMIX ICONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its for colorblind people.

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued.

@SavetheAtlantic

PkmnQ wrote:

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued.

@SavetheAtlantic

what

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued. 3.0 runs on a format that won’t be discontinued for a very long time, if ever. the scratch team has no reason to start from scratch (no pun intended) and make a new version. they’ll probably just keep updating 3.0 until it becomes easier/better to start over again, which won’t happen for at least a few years.

I’m just gonna drop this here

You mean these?

Yeah, I think those are for easier accessibility by colorblind people.

DifferentDance8 wrote:

You mean these?

Yeah, I think those are for easier accessibility by colorblind people.

yeah

BabyBellaBoor wrote:

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued. 3.0 runs on a format that won’t be discontinued for a very long time, if ever. the scratch team has no reason to start from scratch (no pun intended) and make a new version. they’ll probably just keep updating 3.0 until it becomes easier/better to start over again, which won’t happen for at least a few years.

CAN YOU GO MAKE A PROJECT AND SEE THE LOVE AND FAV AND EYE AND REMIX ICONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ok and

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued. 3.0 runs on a format that won’t be discontinued for a very long time, if ever. the scratch team has no reason to start from scratch (no pun intended) and make a new version. they’ll probably just keep updating 3.0 until it becomes easier/better to start over again, which won’t happen for at least a few years.

I’m just gonna drop this here

his first argument is that the times don’t line up. his first claim is that flash stopped development in 2011 and told developers to move to HTML5, so Flash was already dead when they made 2.0. this is false. they released updates until the end, and they told developers to use HTML in 2015. 2.0 was released in 2013, two years before. it has likely been in the works long before that. Flash was still going strong at the time. then he asks why they “waited” so long to make a version on a more robust platform. I think it’s pretty obvious. they didn’t have a major reason to until it was clear Flash was done, and then it takes a long time to make a whole new version of scratch.

his second argument is that they could’ve just converted 2.0 to HTML. I hope I don’t have to explain why this doesn’t make sense. it’s not that simple for something like scratch, and if you’re going to redo scratch to make it run on HTML, you may as well just rebuild it. this is just a decision the scratch team made, and it doesn’t impact whether 3.0 was made for the Flash EOL.

none of this matters, either. the bulk of the argument is that there just isn’t a reason to remake scratch (which historically has been the criteria for a major version), which is true regardless of the motives of 3.0.

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

GIitchInTheMatrix wrote:

ScratchCatHELLO wrote:

3.0 was made because 2.0 used a format that was being discontinued. 3.0 runs on a format that won’t be discontinued for a very long time, if ever. the scratch team has no reason to start from scratch (no pun intended) and make a new version. they’ll probably just keep updating 3.0 until it becomes easier/better to start over again, which won’t happen for at least a few years.

I’m just gonna drop this here

his first argument is that the times don’t line up. his first claim is that flash stopped development in 2011 and told developers to move to HTML5, so Flash was already dead when they made 2.0. this is false. they released updates until the end, and they told developers to use HTML in 2015. 2.0 was released in 2013, two years before. it has likely been in the works long before that. Flash was still going strong at the time. then he asks why they “waited” so long to make a version on a more robust platform. I think it’s pretty obvious. they didn’t have a major reason to until it was clear Flash was done, and then it takes a long time to make a whole new version of scratch.

his second argument is that they could’ve just converted 2.0 to HTML. I hope I don’t have to explain why this doesn’t make sense. it’s not that simple for something like scratch, and if you’re going to redo scratch to make it run on HTML, you may as well just rebuild it. this is just a decision the scratch team made, and it doesn’t impact whether 3.0 was made for the Flash EOL.

none of this matters, either. the bulk of the argument is that there just isn’t a reason to remake scratch (which historically has been the criteria for a major version), which is true regardless of the motives of 3.0.

Bring it to their account than

I reloaded a page and suddenly the icons changed… but that still isn't 4.0.

i liked the old layout

I do believe Scratch uses Semver for versioning. Read about it here: https://semver.org/

Probably a change, i never saw that from 2 years and before, but as people say, it's for colorblind people (but they didn't make themes for Scratch as it could make for colorblind people navigate scratch.

i know i knoww