Censor Posts in suggestions that only Contain "Support" or "No support" (Read the Entire OP Before Posting)

290Scratcher

SuperMarioHome wrote:
No support. Users new to the forums may not understand why the post would be rejected if they just put ‘Support’ or ‘No support’.

They might do that at first!

The mockup in the above post.literally has a reason with it.

ScolderCreations wrote:
Reading the replies… …bad idea.

You have a good point, not to mention this would be simply discouraged by adding this feature.

This is my forum signature, here it's okay to… forget it, you've probably seen hundreds of these signatures before.
https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ <— Click this funny and not suspicious link to get Scratch 4 early!

Joined at the age of 8 and somehow I'm still alive and decently semi-active on the forums.

(Reminder to take care of yourself and stay safe, the world is wild after all)

https://ecosia.org it's good trust me

cruncherBones

Codingfairy07 wrote:
ScolderCreations wrote:
Reading the replies to this topic made me very mad. Just because this can be worked around, doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. People can work around swearwords, but we shouldn't allow people to say them anyway, right? People could post links to inappropriate websites if they found some work around, but we still try to stop them, don't we? So saying you don't support just because people could find a way around it, is absolutely invalid, and I support the suggestion because it would cut down on spam, just because it doesn't 100% ensure that it doesn't happen doesn't mean it's a bad idea.
Well, this is impossible. The filter can’t detect context.

It can detect a post that is just “no support”
Cruncherbones

THE TRUE HIPPO ON SCRATCH

platfomer coming soon

funny by my m8

GIitchInTheMatrix

Support.

Enough said. Ain’t constructive in the slightest.
Also, bump.

this is my signature
I have exactly 8934 posts

k7e

S[b][/b]upport
Support!
Support.
+1
+98765434567654345678765 (or any number)
I support this!
Support!

1000000000000e+Infinity% Support!

@mythoslore was so much more obvious than @spookily

unmissable

Ignore this

Last edited by unmissable (April 15, 2023 13:50:30)

Generation IX (9): the first time you see this copy and paste it on top of your sig in the scratch forums and increase generation by 1. Social experiment.

I changed my signature

Found interesting, funny or plain good posts? Send them here!

Notebook | Ocular | me has a profile chatroom | The amazing triple ninja'd

doggy_boi1

No Support

i hate my username
Chickens are the superior animal!

(⌐⎔_⎔)//This is Jack, he's been fighting these evil kumquats since early 2023!


(((( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́))))

k7e

doggy_boi1 wrote:
No Support

Please be constructive and say why you don't support. (Or is that a test?)

@mythoslore was so much more obvious than @spookily

doggy_boi1

k7e wrote:
doggy_boi1 wrote:
No Support
Please be constructive and say why you don't support. (Or is that a test?)

I don't support it because scratches filter bot cant detect context, there are too many bypasses, and it would just be annoying (it also doesn't go against tas)

i hate my username
Chickens are the superior animal!

(⌐⎔_⎔)//This is Jack, he's been fighting these evil kumquats since early 2023!


(((( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́))))

lapisi

doggy_boi1 wrote:
(#48)
k7e wrote:
doggy_boi1 wrote:
No Support
Please be constructive and say why you don't support. (Or is that a test?)
I don't support it because scratches filter bot cant detect context, there are too many bypasses, and it would just be annoying (it also doesn't go against tas)

actually it's against the rules to make unconstructive posts like that

don't forget

why are humans so meaty?

doggy_boi1

lapisi wrote:
doggy_boi1 wrote:
(#48)
k7e wrote:
doggy_boi1 wrote:
No Support
Please be constructive and say why you don't support. (Or is that a test?)
I don't support it because scratches filter bot cant detect context, there are too many bypasses, and it would just be annoying (it also doesn't go against tas)
actually it's against the rules to make unconstructive posts like that

fr? where?

i hate my username
Chickens are the superior animal!

(⌐⎔_⎔)//This is Jack, he's been fighting these evil kumquats since early 2023!


(((( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́))))

doggy_boi1

doggy_boi1 wrote:
lapisi wrote:
doggy_boi1 wrote:
(#48)
k7e wrote:
doggy_boi1 wrote:
No Support
Please be constructive and say why you don't support. (Or is that a test?)
I don't support it because scratches filter bot cant detect context, there are too many bypasses, and it would just be annoying (it also doesn't go against tas)
actually it's against the rules to make unconstructive posts like that
fr? where?

oh, I found it, and I'm pretty sure it's just for projects. How would they implement the op's idea anyways?

Last edited by doggy_boi1 (April 16, 2023 03:30:10)

i hate my username
Chickens are the superior animal!

(⌐⎔_⎔)//This is Jack, he's been fighting these evil kumquats since early 2023!


(((( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́) ( •̀ᴗ•́))))

k7e

k7e wrote:
S[b][/b]upport
Support!
Support.
+1
+98765434567654345678765 (or any number)
I support this!
Support!
1000000000000e+Infinity% Support!

Also, someone could just say this:
[OP quote] Support!

@mythoslore was so much more obvious than @spookily

-OdysseyCentral-

I don’t like this idea.
You probably get the point by now

The Honey Shop is back! Check us out on the Requests forum!

=== ♪ ♬ ♫ ᴺᴼᵂ ᴾᴸᴬᵞᴵᴺᴳ : Champion’s Road, from Odyssey’s Ultimate Playlist ♩ ♭ ♫ ===
=== 1:37 ───ㅇ───── 4.01 ↻ Previous Song: Battle on The Great Tower◁ II ▷Next song: Ground (SMW) ↺. ♬ ♪ ♩===

capybara256

k7e wrote:
S[b][/b]upport
Support!
Support.
+1
+98765434567654345678765 (or any number)
I support this!
Support!
1000000000000e+Infinity% Support!

please be constructive so wh y you suppert

embrace masculinity

k7e

capybara256 wrote:
k7e wrote:
S[b][/b]upport
Support!
Support.
+1
+98765434567654345678765 (or any number)
I support this!
Support!
1000000000000e+Infinity% Support!
please be constructive so wh y you suppert

Those are other things that people could say instead of “support” to get around the censor.

@mythoslore was so much more obvious than @spookily

-OdysseyCentral-

capybara256 wrote:
k7e wrote:
S[b][/b]upport
Support!
Support.
+1
+98765434567654345678765 (or any number)
I support this!
Support!
1000000000000e+Infinity% Support!
please be constructive so wh y you suppert

It’s an example of workarounds for this filter. It’s constructive.

The Honey Shop is back! Check us out on the Requests forum!

=== ♪ ♬ ♫ ᴺᴼᵂ ᴾᴸᴬᵞᴵᴺᴳ : Champion’s Road, from Odyssey’s Ultimate Playlist ♩ ♭ ♫ ===
=== 1:37 ───ㅇ───── 4.01 ↻ Previous Song: Battle on The Great Tower◁ II ▷Next song: Ground (SMW) ↺. ♬ ♪ ♩===

CryptoWare

why does the human will have to go so far to say such a simple thing so complicated when they could just e constructive. Just because there is a workaround doesn't mean that it will often be used. This system will help teacher new scratchers things. Its not like they are not going to read it.

capybara256

i think it should work like this: if the post have support or no support it should atleast have another 10 or maybe 20 letters

Last edited by capybara256 (April 16, 2023 19:23:59)

embrace masculinity

k7e

capybara256 wrote:
i think it should work like this: if the post have support or no support it should atleast have another 10 or maybe 20 letters

[OP Quote]
I support this!

@mythoslore was so much more obvious than @spookily

Discuss Scratch