Censor Posts in suggestions that only Contain "Support" or "No support" (Read the Entire OP Before Posting)

k7e

People could say:

Sup[]port
Support!
+1
I support this!
Full support
OMEGA SUPPORT!!!!!!

(King of second page)

Last edited by k7e (Aug. 5, 2021 15:27:44)

@mythoslore was so much more obvious than @spookily

AlfabetonsOfficial

No support, there are many was to say “Support” or “No Support”. And as like others said, the filter bot is still learning, so it can't detect context yet.

Let's learn Spanish with the Alfabetons!
Click here to get started!
Visit the official Alfabetons website!

290Scratcher

No support unless it counts context and blocks workarounds like:

The workaround uses empty BBCode tags in the middle of the word wrote:
Support!

This is my forum signature, here it's okay to… forget it, you've probably seen hundreds of these signatures before.
https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ <— Click this funny and not suspicious link to get Scratch 4 early!

Joined at the age of 8 and somehow I'm still alive and decently semi-active on the forums.

(Reminder to take care of yourself and stay safe, the world is wild after all)

https://ecosia.org it's good trust me

ScolderCreations

Reading the replies to this topic made me very mad. Just because this can be worked around, doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. People can work around swearwords, but we shouldn't allow people to say them anyway, right? People could post links to inappropriate websites if they found some work around, but we still try to stop them, don't we? So saying you don't support just because people could find a way around it, is absolutely invalid, and I support the suggestion because it would cut down on spam, just because it doesn't 100% ensure that it doesn't happen doesn't mean it's a bad idea.

Codingfairy07

ScolderCreations wrote:
Reading the replies to this topic made me very mad. Just because this can be worked around, doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. People can work around swearwords, but we shouldn't allow people to say them anyway, right? People could post links to inappropriate websites if they found some work around, but we still try to stop them, don't we? So saying you don't support just because people could find a way around it, is absolutely invalid, and I support the suggestion because it would cut down on spam, just because it doesn't 100% ensure that it doesn't happen doesn't mean it's a bad idea.

Well, this is impossible. The filter can’t detect context.

 (φ゜▽゜*♪) :: sensing // This is Laura, my kumquat guard who never sleeps. Sleeping is for amateur Kumquat guards.

Announcement
;

KangaCoder

No support. The sensor isn’t exactly the best one, and there are many ways to say “support” and “no support”.

don't feed the trolls. feed yourself pizza cupcakez

.[1] [2] [3] [4]

KangaCoder • [he/him] • kæŋɡəˈ koʊdər

• Random Fun Facts: Male, Christian, US resident, EST time zone, Ravenclaw, likes Math and Science, learning German, knows HTML, Python and Java, loves chocolate, favorite color, possibly a kangaroo
• On the Main Site: Experienced Wikian, Camp Counselor, SWC Reviewer, SDS Helper, Forum Helper
• On the Forums: 2.65K+ forum posts
•

Project Ideas Directory 6.0 - need a project idea? Check it out!
• Check out some weird and cool Scratch pages!

lapisi

wangat wrote:
No support. The sensor isn’t exactly the best one, and there are many ways to say “support” and “no support”.

read this post that is literally 2 posts above yours:

ScolderCreations wrote:
Reading the replies to this topic made me very mad. Just because this can be worked around, doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. People can work around swearwords, but we shouldn't allow people to say them anyway, right? People could post links to inappropriate websites if they found some work around, but we still try to stop them, don't we? So saying you don't support just because people could find a way around it, is absolutely invalid, and I support the suggestion because it would cut down on spam, just because it doesn't 100% ensure that it doesn't happen doesn't mean it's a bad idea.

don't forget

why are humans so meaty?

ScolderCreations

Codingfairy07 wrote:
ScolderCreations wrote:
Reading the replies to this topic made me very mad. Just because this can be worked around, doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. People can work around swearwords, but we shouldn't allow people to say them anyway, right? People could post links to inappropriate websites if they found some work around, but we still try to stop them, don't we? So saying you don't support just because people could find a way around it, is absolutely invalid, and I support the suggestion because it would cut down on spam, just because it doesn't 100% ensure that it doesn't happen doesn't mean it's a bad idea.
Well, this is impossible. The filter can’t detect context.

Who said it needs to? Read my post.

Codingfairy07

ScolderCreations wrote:
Codingfairy07 wrote:
ScolderCreations wrote:
Reading the replies to this topic made me very mad. Just because this can be worked around, doesn't mean it shouldn't be implemented. People can work around swearwords, but we shouldn't allow people to say them anyway, right? People could post links to inappropriate websites if they found some work around, but we still try to stop them, don't we? So saying you don't support just because people could find a way around it, is absolutely invalid, and I support the suggestion because it would cut down on spam, just because it doesn't 100% ensure that it doesn't happen doesn't mean it's a bad idea.
Well, this is impossible. The filter can’t detect context.
Who said it needs to? Read my post.

Just saying.

 (φ゜▽゜*♪) :: sensing // This is Laura, my kumquat guard who never sleeps. Sleeping is for amateur Kumquat guards.

Announcement
;

I_am_Alone

No support.
One reason why people might say just their opinion is because all they can add to the conversation has already been stated, and therefore their response would be redundant, and the responder would not like to be redundant. I admit they could quote other people's replies, but as I said they might not want to do that.

{,,,}oUo{,,,} Kilroy was here

lapisi

I_am_Alone wrote:
No support.
One reason why people might say just their opinion is because all they can add to the conversation has already been stated, and therefore their response would be redundant, and the responder would not like to be redundant. I admit they could quote other people's replies, but as I said they might not want to do that.

the forums aren't a ballot box, whenever I support or no support a suggestion but the reason why was already stated I just follow the topic

don't forget

why are humans so meaty?

han614698

lapisi wrote:
support

How ironic.

No support, sometimes (in the case of a proposal in the requests forum), it is okay just to say “no support”

Credit to -gge for the icons in my signature | I condensed all this code into five lines using [p] tags, idk why

ScolderCreations

lapisi

han614698 wrote:
lapisi wrote:
support
How ironic.

No support, sometimes (in the case of a proposal in the requests forum), it is okay just to say “no support”

the reason I did that is to prove a point, we need this so people can't do something like just posting “support,” also I have no idea how the requests forum works so I don't think I can comment on that

Last edited by lapisi (Aug. 7, 2021 23:27:45)

don't forget

why are humans so meaty?

Xolay

Sorry but no support

I'm a 8 year old boy

[0.0](ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ::stack)('_'::stack variables)(o,o::stack control)(d_b::stack operators)(²-²::stack motion)(1_1::stack looks)(°-°::stack sound)::stack #000000//these are my kumquat protectors

Scratch|Wiki

if <(username) = [add signature] > then
set [big brain v]to [True] 
end

WHAT??? HOW ARE YOU SEEING THIS?

<<true(::grey) ::#00FF00>::operators>
<<(::grey) false::#ff0000>::operators>

I love courtney from total dramarama
My goal:

5000 posts (::control) (::control) (::#000000) (::#000000) (::#000000) ::#00008B

Credits: Google

move (1) step::motion

hello, light mode user
hello, dark mode user

this hat is looking at u

() () ::custom hat

POV: you are a ST member about to report
See the POV of being a Scratch Team member.

atchscray isyay ayay igh-levelhay ock-basedblay isualvay ogrammingpray anguagelay andyay ebsiteway argetedtay imarilypray atyay ildrenchay 8–16 asyay anyay educationalyay ooltay orfay ogrammingpray.

PLZ buy me a Wedo 2.0

hellohellohellohello

I BELIEVE IN VS TOTAL DRAMARAMA SUPREMACY

you are not being valid offtopic there

hahaha superhero block go brrrr::#FFFFFF cap

made with uploads.scratch.mit.edu

DarthVader4Life

Xolay wrote:
Sorry but no support

Is this supposed to make a point?

Be Moist

Also, here's a helpful link to Ocular
I am DV4L, Erector of Text Walls, Typer of Long Posts, Creator of Mini-mod posts
The kumquats have eaten this line, so I have to have a new way to repel them.
Had a bad day or are feeling bored? Watch this to make your day better in an interesting way.
Do you think you've been banned unfairly? Then you'd be wrong. The ST aren't children, so quit acting like they are.

mrcreatorluigi

Xolay wrote:
Sorry but no support

Please say why you don’t support.

if i was in aladdin, my first wish would be to have infinite wishes, and use those infinite wishes for infinite wishes on each wish, rince and repeat

Quantum-Cat

Support
The filter can't censor every workaround, but it doesn't need to. Most people that will write unconstructive comments will use “No Support” and “Support” because nearly all other replies (constructive or unconstructive) will contain these phrases. Even if it isn't 100% foolproof, it will help prevent spam.

Notice: Everything below the solid grey line (↑↑) above is my signature and appears on every post I make. Here, it is okay for you to advertise
your projects and other creations. To create your own, scroll to the bottom of the Discussion Home page and select “change your signature”.
I aplogise if I seem a bit too serious on the forums, but I am always open to feedback on my profile.
Past PPTBF Curator || Forum Helper (TFH) || Some Python, HTML and C
————————————————————————————

————————————————————————————
Quantum-Cat

Quantum-Cat

minecraftprox101 wrote:
It would show the 60 Second rule popup, but instead, saying “It seems that your post unconstructive, Pleasle make constructive posts”.

Like this?

Last edited by Quantum-Cat (Aug. 8, 2021 13:26:35)

Notice: Everything below the solid grey line (↑↑) above is my signature and appears on every post I make. Here, it is okay for you to advertise
your projects and other creations. To create your own, scroll to the bottom of the Discussion Home page and select “change your signature”.
I aplogise if I seem a bit too serious on the forums, but I am always open to feedback on my profile.
Past PPTBF Curator || Forum Helper (TFH) || Some Python, HTML and C
————————————————————————————

————————————————————————————
Quantum-Cat

SuperMarioHome

No support. Users new to the forums may not understand why the post would be rejected if they just put ‘Support’ or ‘No support’.

They might do that at first!

Check out Project Forumoji!

—–

—–

ScratchDOS 4.0 in the works!

;

Discuss Scratch