Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Collaboration
- » ☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
- _TheGameDesigner_
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
you wont know unitl the 29th
Last edited by _TheGameDesigner_ (Dec. 28, 2017 15:28:44)
PLAY MY NEWEST GAMES! https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/169802246/
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/171209882/
- Amazeheartsoflove
- Scratcher
18 posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Yay! Good job! (For every team) Let's try harder next round, and try to win!! Go Tea Tables!
“Don't practice until you get it right. Practice it until you can't get it wrong.”
“She acts like summer, but walks like rain…”
<3, @Amazeheartsoflove
- -FrozenFlame-
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Don't get too excited, I'm not the final say. Yay! Good job! (For every team) Let's try harder next round, and try to win!! Go Tea Tables!
- Amazeheartsoflove
- Scratcher
18 posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Don't get too excited, I'm not the final say. Yay! Good job! (For every team) Let's try harder next round, and try to win!! Go Tea Tables!
Oh yes, I know! I'm just cheering everyone on to the next round, and telling them they did a good job!
“Don't practice until you get it right. Practice it until you can't get it wrong.”
“She acts like summer, but walks like rain…”
<3, @Amazeheartsoflove
- maroonz
- Scratcher
13 posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
When will the next round come out
Looking for cat books? I recommend Paul Gallico. The Silent Miaow and the Honorable Cat are two great books by him.
play sound [ meow v]
- PokemonScratch101
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Judging Rubric - Round 1 of Tea Table
Team: Black Tea
Judged by: @PokemonScratch101
Design: 7/20
0/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
0/2 - Included a thumbnail
3/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
1/1 - Visually appealing project
3/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
Nice clock, not complete, coding is cool.
Functionality: 6/20
2/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
1/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
3/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes:
See above
Creativity: 5/20
5/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
I like the clock, I would've given more had it been completed
Teamwork: 11.5/20
4/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
3/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
2.5/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
2/5 - Communication was effective
Notes:
Hard to tell when people were active
Completion: 2.5/20
2/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
0/3 - Includes realistic setting
.5/1 - Includes team's colors
0/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
0/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
0/2 - Includes an Easter egg
0/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes:
Not complete
i haven't edited this in a long time - ps101, 2022
- maroonz
- Scratcher
13 posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Approximately Jan 3rd, but not confirmed. When will the next round come out
Thanks for the info!
Looking for cat books? I recommend Paul Gallico. The Silent Miaow and the Honorable Cat are two great books by him.
play sound [ meow v]
- _TheGameDesigner_
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Judging Rubric - Round 1 of Tea Table
Team: White Tea
Judged by: @_TheGameDesigner_
Design: 7/20
1/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
2/2 - Included a thumbnail
3/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
0/1 - Visually appealing project
4/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I like it, but, I wished the intro art matched the game style of art.
Functionality: 7/20
4/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
1/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
2/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes: I kinda liked it, but for me I found the speed not realistic at all.
Creativity: 8/20
4/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I found it good, there was a lot to it, but it wasn't really that creative in style and ideas.
Teamwork: 13/20
4/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
4/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
2/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
3/5 - Communication was effective
Notes: I could kind of tell if they was active or not, also was unclear who helped or not. I had to look in their studio.
Completion: 16/20
10/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
0/3 - Includes realistic setting
1/1 - Includes team's colors
1/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
2/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
1/2 - Includes an Easter egg
1/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes: It was complete in my vision, but it could've been curated a little better.
Team: White Tea
Judged by: @_TheGameDesigner_
Design: 7/20
1/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
2/2 - Included a thumbnail
3/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
0/1 - Visually appealing project
4/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I like it, but, I wished the intro art matched the game style of art.
Functionality: 7/20
4/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
1/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
2/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes: I kinda liked it, but for me I found the speed not realistic at all.
Creativity: 8/20
4/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I found it good, there was a lot to it, but it wasn't really that creative in style and ideas.
Teamwork: 13/20
4/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
4/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
2/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
3/5 - Communication was effective
Notes: I could kind of tell if they was active or not, also was unclear who helped or not. I had to look in their studio.
Completion: 16/20
10/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
0/3 - Includes realistic setting
1/1 - Includes team's colors
1/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
2/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
1/2 - Includes an Easter egg
1/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes: It was complete in my vision, but it could've been curated a little better.
Last edited by _TheGameDesigner_ (Dec. 29, 2017 21:23:29)
PLAY MY NEWEST GAMES! https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/169802246/
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/171209882/
- _TheGameDesigner_
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Judging Rubric - Round 1 of Tea Table
Team: Black Tea
Judged by: @_TheGamedesinger_
Design: 5/20
1/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
0/2 - Included a thumbnail
2/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
0/1 - Visually appealing project
2/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I personally thought it could've been better art work.
Functionality: 9/20
4/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
1/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
4/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes: It could've had a better ‘fall’ and ‘move’ also it didn't work at times, AKA the coins didn't fall to the bottom.
Creativity: 3/20
3/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: There was hardly any creativity in here.
Teamwork: 11/20
5/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
5/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
1/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
1/5 - Communication was effective
Notes: There wasn't much team work at all here.
Completion: 2/20
2/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
0/3 - Includes realistic setting
0/1 - Includes team's colors
0/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
0/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
0/2 - Includes an Easter egg
0/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes: This wasn't complete nor' it was good to look at.
Team: Black Tea
Judged by: @_TheGamedesinger_
Design: 5/20
1/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
0/2 - Included a thumbnail
2/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
0/1 - Visually appealing project
2/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I personally thought it could've been better art work.
Functionality: 9/20
4/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
1/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
4/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes: It could've had a better ‘fall’ and ‘move’ also it didn't work at times, AKA the coins didn't fall to the bottom.
Creativity: 3/20
3/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: There was hardly any creativity in here.
Teamwork: 11/20
5/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
5/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
1/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
1/5 - Communication was effective
Notes: There wasn't much team work at all here.
Completion: 2/20
2/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
0/3 - Includes realistic setting
0/1 - Includes team's colors
0/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
0/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
0/2 - Includes an Easter egg
0/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes: This wasn't complete nor' it was good to look at.
Last edited by _TheGameDesigner_ (Dec. 29, 2017 21:30:37)
PLAY MY NEWEST GAMES! https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/169802246/
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/171209882/
- _TheGameDesigner_
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Judging Rubric - Round 1 of Tea Table
Team: Team Matcha
Judged by: @_TheGamedesigner_
Design: 18/20
2/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
2/2 - Included a thumbnail
5/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
1/1 - Visually appealing project
8/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I loved it and it matched the studio style of art.
Functionality: 17/20
8/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
2/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
7/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes: It was smooth and i loved the animation.
Creativity: 18/20
18/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I loved how it involved more than one actions going on.
Teamwork: 20/20
5/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
5/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
5/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
5/5 - Communication was effective
Notes: The only team where i hadn't have to go into the studio to look for credit! Also, comments said they was active and looking, they was.
Completion: 2/20
10/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
2/3 - Includes realistic setting
1/1 - Includes team's colors
1/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
2/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
0/2 - Includes an Easter egg
1/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes: After reading the explanation I still couldn't find the Easter egg.
Team: Team Matcha
Judged by: @_TheGamedesigner_
Design: 18/20
2/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
2/2 - Included a thumbnail
5/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
1/1 - Visually appealing project
8/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I loved it and it matched the studio style of art.
Functionality: 17/20
8/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
2/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
7/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes: It was smooth and i loved the animation.
Creativity: 18/20
18/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I loved how it involved more than one actions going on.
Teamwork: 20/20
5/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
5/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
5/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
5/5 - Communication was effective
Notes: The only team where i hadn't have to go into the studio to look for credit! Also, comments said they was active and looking, they was.
Completion: 2/20
10/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
2/3 - Includes realistic setting
1/1 - Includes team's colors
1/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
2/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
0/2 - Includes an Easter egg
1/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes: After reading the explanation I still couldn't find the Easter egg.
PLAY MY NEWEST GAMES! https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/169802246/
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/171209882/
- maroonz
- Scratcher
13 posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
0/2 - Includes an Easter egg
Notes: After reading the explanation I still couldn't find the Easter egg.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––-–––
It actually does have an easter egg! If you look carefully at the egg it has stripes at one point in time, click on the egg before the stripes disappear you can find the easter egg.
Notes: After reading the explanation I still couldn't find the Easter egg.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––-–––
It actually does have an easter egg! If you look carefully at the egg it has stripes at one point in time, click on the egg before the stripes disappear you can find the easter egg.
Looking for cat books? I recommend Paul Gallico. The Silent Miaow and the Honorable Cat are two great books by him.
play sound [ meow v]
- PokemonScratch101
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Judging Rubric - Round 1 of Tea Table
Team: Matcha Tea
Judged by: @PokemonScratch101
Design: /20
2/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
2/2 - Included a thumbnail
5/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
1/1 - Visually appealing project
10/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
Functionality: /20
9.5/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
2/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
8/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes:
Don't know how the hamster wheel and lever correlates, otherwise great
Creativity: 20/20
20/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
Teamwork: 20/20
5/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
5/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
5/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
5/5 - Communication was effective
Notes:
Completion: 20/20
10/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
3/3 - Includes realistic setting
1/1 - Includes team's colors
1/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
1/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
2/2 - Includes an Easter egg
1/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes:
Great!
Last edited by PokemonScratch101 (Dec. 29, 2017 22:01:17)
i haven't edited this in a long time - ps101, 2022
- PokemonScratch101
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Judging Rubric - Round 1 of Tea Table
Team: White Tea
Judged by: @PokemonScratch101
Design: 14.5/20
1/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
0/2 - Included a thumbnail
3.5/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
0/1 - Visually appealing project
5/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
Art was not great nor consistent.
Functionality: 17/20
9/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
2/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
6/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes:
Physics weren't realistic
Creativity: 14/20
14/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
Great idea, not well executed
Teamwork: 17/20
5/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
5/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
3.5/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
3.5/5 - Communication was effective
Notes:
Okay with teamwork
Completion: 20/20
10/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
3/3 - Includes realistic setting
1/1 - Includes team's colors
0/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
2/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
2/2 - Includes an Easter egg
1/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes:
Could be better
Last edited by PokemonScratch101 (Dec. 29, 2017 22:07:48)
i haven't edited this in a long time - ps101, 2022
- PokemonScratch101
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Judging Rubric - Round 1 of Tea Table
Team: Oolong Tea
Judged by: @PokemonScratch101
Design: 3/20
1/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
0/2 - Included a thumbnail
0/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
0/1 - Visually appealing project
2/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
Not complete
Functionality: 7/20
1/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
2/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
4/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes:
Not complete
Creativity: 0/20
0/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
Not sure what it's supposed to do
Teamwork: 7/20
2/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
1/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
2/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
2/5 - Communication was effective
Notes:
Not great
Completion: 5/20
4/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
0/3 - Includes realistic setting
1/1 - Includes team's colors
0/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
0/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
0/2 - Includes an Easter egg
0/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes:
Incomplete
i haven't edited this in a long time - ps101, 2022
- -FrozenFlame-
- Scratcher
100+ posts
☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕
Send in your grades!!!
I have no grades of Herbal from the 2 judges, and I'm missing one for Oolong. Send them in! I need to average all of them and add notes.
I have no grades of Herbal from the 2 judges, and I'm missing one for Oolong. Send them in! I need to average all of them and add notes.
- Discussion Forums
- » Collaboration
- » ☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕