Botcho_Otkho wrote:

It's a cool suggestion,but I can't understand how this would help when you mess up a script.

awesome5185 wrote:

Botcho_Otkho wrote:

It's a cool suggestion,but I can't understand how this would help when you mess up a script.

It's so you don't accidently drag a script into the wrong place (eg: into another script or the trash)

Botcho_Otkho wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Botcho_Otkho wrote:

It's a cool suggestion,but I can't understand how this would help when you mess up a script.

It's so you don't accidently drag a script into the wrong place (eg: into another script or the trash)

Oh, I understand. Support for the reasons you said in the OP.

mrbumppo wrote:

Support.

Inkulumo wrote:

No support, this is really easy to workaround by just duplicating the sprite or the script you are working on and then testing them individually. I can see the use in this, but it's just way too easy to do without.

broadcast [ v] in layer (1 v) ::stack events // It targets the layer with a local broadcast there, useful for games or something (but still useful) no use in current layer
broadcast [ v] in layer (1 v) and wait ::stack events // broadcast and wait of layers basically
stop [other layers in sprite v] ::stack // stops other layers in sprite
stop [all layers except current v] ::stack // stops other layers
stop [current layer v] // stops the layer. acts like a stop all to the layer

IIGunnerII wrote:

block ideas!

broadcast [ v] in layer (1 v) ::stack events // It targets the layer with a local broadcast there, useful for games or something (but still useful) no use in current layer
broadcast [ v] in layer (1 v) and wait ::stack events // broadcast and wait of layers basically
stop [other layers in sprite v] ::stack // stops other layers in sprite
stop [all layers except current v] ::stack // stops other layers
stop [current layer v] // stops the layer. acts like a stop all to the layer

ALSO 150% support, very useful! So many creative opportunities!