lugia_scarlet wrote:

now here is my new concept: genocide legacy.. papyrus is the first of the genocide legacy bosses I will tell you about (aside from my undyne concept)

phase 1 (original papyrus): this phase basically refers to the normal papyrus fight (papyrus is simply sad, but still believes in the human), he now uses the telekinesis sans uses in his fight and will start dodging your attacks (every 2 or 3 turns.)

phase 2 (disbelief): papyrus asks sans (who is now just a pile of dust because of an early-game death) for his jacket and puts it on.. (papyrus is trying to help you break out of your desire to kill ). the difference between most disbeliefs and this one is that papyrus is still the friendly skelebro we know and love, and he does not have the gaster blasters like in just about every disbelief fangame.. anyway, he should have new bone attacks at this point..

phase 3 (DDD): papyrus realizes the reality that he can't save you, and in grief, puts on one of his armors (he has a few) and attempts to fight against you for the benefit of your joy… his attacks are the same as the original DDD fight, however the blue soul and bones are used more often…

phase 4 (revenge REBOOT!): papyrus starts to get angry and puts on his best armor, one of a TRUE ROYAL GUARD! he now uses the new ORANGE soul, which makes it to where you have to “brave” attacks (the brave abillity is activated via space, and allows you to shield against white attacks).. the attacks are the same (besides the new orange soul attacks) and when you make the final blow..

phase 5 (player wins): this one is obvious… just hit papyrus one last time and he will slowly die… however, even then, he still believes you can be a good person…

Dan-The-Squid wrote:

Theory:

Gaster is overrated

GraduateScratchy wrote:

Dan-The-Squid wrote:

Theory:

Gaster is overrated

That's not a theory.
That's fact.

sowut123 wrote:

gaster is sans
sans is ness
gaster is ness

lugia_scarlet wrote:

sowut123 wrote:

gaster is sans
sans is ness
gaster is ness

all of those theories are incorrect, they are just THEORIES, not actual facts.

lugia_scarlet wrote:

GraduateScratchy wrote:

Dan-The-Squid wrote:

Theory:

Gaster is overrated

That's not a theory.
That's fact.

despite having a gaster pfp, i can agree.

GraduateScratchy wrote:

lugia_scarlet wrote:

GraduateScratchy wrote:

Dan-The-Squid wrote:

Theory:

Gaster is overrated

That's not a theory.
That's fact.

despite having a gaster pfp, i can agree.

Characters being overrated doesn't mean they're badly made characters.

_nix wrote:

lugia_scarlet wrote:

sowut123 wrote:

gaster is sans
sans is ness
gaster is ness

all of those theories are incorrect, they are just THEORIES, not actual facts.

But if true – and we already know that gaster is overrated, and that this is fact – then this would imply that ness is overrated… and is that not a contradiction!?

GraduateScratchy wrote:

Dan-The-Squid wrote:

Theory:

Gaster is overrated

That's not a theory.
That's fact.

Dancebreeze wrote:

GraduateScratchy wrote:

Dan-The-Squid wrote:

Theory:

Gaster is overrated

That's not a theory.
That's fact.

Honestly yeah. Probably the most famous removed video game character.

PearlPlatypus2048 wrote:

Dancebreeze wrote:

GraduateScratchy wrote:

Dan-The-Squid wrote:

Theory:

Gaster is overrated

That's not a theory.
That's fact.

Honestly yeah. Probably the most famous removed video game character.

He's a pretty good character but he's practically become a fan character at this point, with all the widely-accepted theories on him.
I mean, canon is canon, but STILL.

GraduateScratchy wrote:

PearlPlatypus2048 wrote:

Dancebreeze wrote:

GraduateScratchy wrote:

Dan-The-Squid wrote:

Theory:

Gaster is overrated

That's not a theory.
That's fact.

Honestly yeah. Probably the most famous removed video game character.

He's a pretty good character but he's practically become a fan character at this point, with all the widely-accepted theories on him.
I mean, canon is canon, but STILL.

Yes.

I can't say much more personally.

_nix wrote:

lugia_scarlet wrote:

sowut123 wrote:

gaster is sans
sans is ness
gaster is ness

all of those theories are incorrect, they are just THEORIES, not actual facts.

But if true – and we already know that gaster is overrated, and that this is fact – then this would imply that ness is overrated… and is that not a contradiction!?

Wintergrean wrote:

https://media1.tenor.com/images/11eadb6bf2c7de838942c1cc2a2472fd/tenor.gif?itemid=10348689

[I probably can't.