Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Advanced Topics
- » Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
![[RSS Feed]](//cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__9c6d3f90ec5f8ace6d3e8ea1e684b778__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]")
![[RSS Feed]](http://cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__9c6d3f90ec5f8ace6d3e8ea1e684b778__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]"){kind=icon}
- herohamp
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Take out variables and all loops…?Hmm I guess so
- MegaApuTurkUltra
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
$(".box-head")[0].textContent = "committing AT crimes since $whenever"
- herohamp
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Custom BlocksTake out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
- Jonathan50
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Did nobody read my posts about recursion??Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
Not yet a Knight of the Mu Calculus.
- PullJosh
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
1 item Lists, I would imagine. (Not sure about loops.)Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
- MegaApuTurkUltra
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
That's smart1 item Lists, I would imagine. (Not sure about loops.)Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
However, there's no good way to replicate variable watchers so I'm keeping vars in my list for now
$(".box-head")[0].textContent = "committing AT crimes since $whenever"
- helloandgoodbye9
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
You can us the pen block and sprites to draw it…That's smart1 item Lists, I would imagine. (Not sure about loops.)Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
However, there's no good way to replicate variable watchers so I'm keeping vars in my list for now
Last edited by kaj (Tomorrow 25:61:61) ͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪ ͣͣͣͣ ͯͯͯͯYes, its above the line)
- comp09
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
You don't need multiple sprites nor costumes - you can draw everything with the pen.You can us the pen block and sprites to draw it…That's smart1 item Lists, I would imagine. (Not sure about loops.)Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
However, there's no good way to replicate variable watchers so I'm keeping vars in my list for now
- herohamp
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Wow we are realy taking this is into detail xD I wanna see somebody make this!You don't need multiple sprites nor costumes - you can draw everything with the pen.You can us the pen block and sprites to draw it…That's smart1 item Lists, I would imagine. (Not sure about loops.)Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
However, there's no good way to replicate variable watchers so I'm keeping vars in my list for now
- helloandgoodbye9
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
So, how about no costumes, backdrops, or even sprites, as you can do everything with the pen.
Last edited by helloandgoodbye9 (April 28, 2016 03:40:11)
Last edited by kaj (Tomorrow 25:61:61) ͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪ ͣͣͣͣ ͯͯͯͯYes, its above the line)
- Jonathan50
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
So, how about no costumes, backdrops, or even sprites, as you can do everything with the pen.No. The stage can't draw anything with pen, so sprites are required. But this is fewest amount of blocks. (You can remove all the costume/backdrop related blocks though.)
Not yet a Knight of the Mu Calculus.
- helloandgoodbye9
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Oh, forgot how pen worked (you have to move the sprite).So, how about no costumes, backdrops, or even sprites, as you can do everything with the pen.No. The stage can't draw anything with pen, so sprites are required. But this is fewest amount of blocks. (You can remove all the costume/backdrop related blocks though.)
Last edited by helloandgoodbye9 (April 28, 2016 03:54:10)
Last edited by kaj (Tomorrow 25:61:61) ͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪͪ ͣͣͣͣ ͯͯͯͯYes, its above the line)
- joefarebrother
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
For Turing completeness, you just need item of list, replace item of list, =, if else, and either custom blocks or broadcast / when I receive. For scratch completeness, you'll need days since 2000, stamp, key pressed, mouse x and y, go to, and mouse down, and probably a few more.
- MegaApuTurkUltra
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
For Turing completeness, you just need item of list, replace item of list, =, if else, and either custom blocks or broadcast / when I receive. For scratch completeness, you'll need days since 2000, stamp, key pressed, mouse x and y, go to, and mouse down, and probably a few more.“probably a few more” as in the majority of things on my list?
I'll start a list of what I didn't include and summarize the workarounds
$(".box-head")[0].textContent = "committing AT crimes since $whenever"
- PullJosh
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
I just remembered about this wiki page. Could be helpful. ;P
- Jonathan50
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Did nobody read my posts about recursion??Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
Not yet a Knight of the Mu Calculus.
- NickyNouse
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
we saw and refuted itDid nobody read my posts about recursion??Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
- Jonathan50
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
No you didn't. Nobody made any reply at all…we saw and refuted itDid nobody read my posts about recursion??Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
Last edited by Jonathan50 (April 29, 2016 03:49:53)
Not yet a Knight of the Mu Calculus.
- NickyNouse
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Oh, the thing about incrementing with recursion? Sure, but arguments don't actually work in Scratch when you try to do recursion, you have to store the values in a separate or listNo you didn't. Nobody made any reply at all…we saw and refuted itDid nobody read my posts about recursion??Take out variables and all loops…?And what do you propose as the workaround?
- Jonathan50
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch
Oh, the thing about incrementing with recursion? Sure, but arguments don't actually work in Scratch when you try to do recursion, you have to store the values in a separate or listI don't know what you mean; the examples I posted work fine…
Not yet a Knight of the Mu Calculus.
- Discussion Forums
- » Advanced Topics
-
» Fewest amount of blocks technically needed to use Scratch