cookieclickerer33 wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/901361598/
this is the proper workaround to color effect reporters, i have no idea what the other ones you where doing where

medians wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/901361598/
this is the proper workaround to color effect reporters, i have no idea what the other ones you where doing where

Basically, multiple variables for the effect reporters I believe if you mean “what were we doing???”, can you clear up the last part of your post? They have labels unlike the list items, so if you use a list, it's going to get kinda annoying to keep track of which list item is which unless you have a system in your code that checks for separation characters.

set [ghost effect v] to (ghost effect::looks)

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

medians wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/901361598/
this is the proper workaround to color effect reporters, i have no idea what the other ones you where doing where

Basically, multiple variables for the effect reporters I believe if you mean “what were we doing???”, can you clear up the last part of your post? They have labels unlike the list items, so if you use a list, it's going to get kinda annoying to keep track of which list item is which unless you have a system in your code that checks for separation characters.

the order of the list is the same as the dropdown on the grapic effect blocks

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

by “what are you doing” i mean alot of people are saying something like this

set [ghost effect v] to (ghost effect::looks)

medians wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

medians wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/901361598/
this is the proper workaround to color effect reporters, i have no idea what the other ones you where doing where

Basically, multiple variables for the effect reporters I believe if you mean “what were we doing???”, can you clear up the last part of your post? They have labels unlike the list items, so if you use a list, it's going to get kinda annoying to keep track of which list item is which unless you have a system in your code that checks for separation characters.

the order of the list is the same as the dropdown on the grapic effect blocks

That's what I assumed, but my problem was that not everyone has the same memory or knowledge of the order, and I think it would be kinda annoying for some people to have to check the dropdown every single time they wanted to know what the order was on the list.

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

by “what are you doing” i mean alot of people are saying something like this

set [ghost effect v] to (ghost effect::looks)

Okay, then I have no idea why they're doing that.

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

i could make it variables but that would just get cluttered fast
if we had dictonaries this wouldnt be an issue

medians wrote:

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

i could make it variables but that would just get cluttered fast
if we had dictonaries this wouldnt be an issue

Yeah I know, I wish we did for reasons like these, but we don't have dictionaries :-/

medians wrote:

Bringing this topic up.

Epsilon_3 wrote:

starlightsparker wrote:

there could be some sort of code that countinuisly changes it in the backround.

Epsilon_3 wrote:

You could just remember what you set it to.

when green flag clicked
forever
change [effect v] by (0)
set [ v] effect to (efefct)
end

so then

([] effect::looks) 

==

(effect)

medians wrote:

medians wrote:

Bringing this topic up.

medians wrote:

medians wrote:

medians wrote:

Bringing this topic up.

ExtremeLogic wrote:

(ghost effect)//category=looks
(mosaic effect)//category=looks
(pixelate effect)//category=looks
(brightness effect)//category=looks
(color effect)//category=looks
(whirl effect)//category=looks

Or just a dropdown.
Use:

when green flag clicked
set [ghost v] effect to (0)
repeat until <(ghost) = [99]>
    
move (3) steps
turn right (3) degrees
change [ghost v] effect by (3)
end

Except it's not a variable. It's a “Looks” block.
↔↔↔↔↔17 SUPPORTERS!!↔↔↔↔↔

medians wrote:

medians wrote:

Bringing this topic up.