The Informal and Unofficial List of Rejected Suggestions

CaptFrIEdshrimp

CaptFrIEdshrimp wrote:
New topic to merge with the committee mods (I think): https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/913031/

bitmap_caketin

CaptFrIEdshrimp wrote:
CaptFrIEdshrimp wrote:
New topic to merge with the committee mods (I think): https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/913031/

I think that that's the same thing roughly, although it wasn't closed for being rejected under 7.2, nobody actually gave a reason why it wouldn't be.

Catscratcher07

bitmap_caketin wrote:
I’ve just removed 305 double spaces from my BBCode topic (using find and replace tools). Is that Za-Chary? I see a lot of double spaces in all of his posts at the end of sentences.

Za-Chary started it, but I will keep it in the list. Feel free to not have it in the BBCode topic.

DeathReviews wrote:
bitmap_caketin wrote:
DeathReviews wrote:
Wait, what happened with codubee
Is this on topic?
Maybe? Did codubee make like some major edit or something? Why Are you all talking about him here?

He was the ST member that changed the topic's name

-InsanityGames- wrote:
Made a website for quoting this thread…let me know how it is

https://insanitystudio.github.io/tolors/

9.5, 9.1, 8.2, 6.4, 5.4, 4.2, 4.1, and 3.2 all have scuffed tags in their titles on your site. You might want to fix that.
I don't think I'll link it on this list; bitmap_caketin's quote topic does the same job without having to link an external site. Feel free to keep maintaining it though.

bitmap_caketin wrote:
hotcrystal wrote:
DeathReviews wrote:
found another one
I don’t think it will added to the list unless it’s been suggested multiple times. This one was only suggested once.
Adding on to this, it seems to mostly have been closed because of the discussion getting out of hand.

I agree that this doesn't need to be added to the list at this time.

bitmap_caketin wrote:
I_wantasheep wrote:
zispe wrote:
-snip-
unless very carefully and intelligently organized
-snip-.
is alphabetical order “intelligently organised”?

(probably not, but i want some better ideas)
If I m going to do it on a project, I would let the user search and sort by relavance.

You may make a project project for it, but I will likely not link it here. I don't see a problem with it existing, but please explicitly mention that it is incomplete and have simular disclaimers as those that exist at the top of this list.

bitmap_caketin wrote:
CaptFrIEdshrimp wrote:
CaptFrIEdshrimp wrote:
New topic to merge with the committee mods (I think): https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/913031/
I think that that's the same thing roughly, although it wasn't closed for being rejected under 7.2, nobody actually gave a reason why it wouldn't be.

I don't think that suggestion has enough distinct from 7.2 to warrant any expansions or changed to 7.2.

-InsanityGames-

Catscratcher07 wrote:
-InsanityGames- wrote:
Made a website for quoting this thread…let me know how it is

https://insanitystudio.github.io/tolors/
9.5, 9.1, 8.2, 6.4, 5.4, 4.2, 4.1, and 3.2 all have scuffed tags in their titles on your site. You might want to fix that.

Should be fixed now.

I don't think I'll link it on this list; bitmap_caketin's quote topic does the same job without having to link an external site. Feel free to keep maintaining it though

That's fine. My website was never meant to “replace” his thread or anything, rather exist as a specialised tool.

Last edited by -InsanityGames- (Today 01:26:35)

Discuss Scratch