Antonyms on April fool's

TheOfficialNussia

KOTP of my topic!

CSwitch wrote:
purplebunny63 wrote:
CSwitch wrote:
TheOfficialNussia wrote:
Read the list of rejected suggestions, also, what is iirc
It stands for (I)f (I) (R)ecall (C)orrectly.
It stands against (U)nless (I) (F)orget (I)ncorrectly.
Let's focus on the actual suggestion, shall we?

“Don't get distracted off the off-topic refusal, shallent they¿ ”

Last edited by TheOfficialNussia (Oct. 3, 2026 14:21:15)

TheOfficialNussia

Bumperino

NutOfCoco

TheOfficialNussia wrote:
Bumperino

*ldyprevab

Last edited by NutOfCoco (Oct. 4, 2026 16:27:58)

TheOfficialNussia

NutOfCoco wrote:
TheOfficialNussia wrote:
Bumperino
*ldyprevab

?

NutOfCoco

TheOfficialNussia wrote:
NutOfCoco wrote:
TheOfficialNussia wrote:
Bumperino
*ldyprevab
?

or just ldyp for leave down your post (revab is erino shifted halfway around the alphabet)

purplebunny63

TheOfficialNussia wrote:
NutOfCoco wrote:
TheOfficialNussia wrote:
Bumperino
*ldyprevab
?

He means idyprevab is the opposite of bumperino

gdfsgdfsgdfg

TheOfficialNussia wrote:
No support, shown fact?

“No support, obvious reason”

Last edited by gdfsgdfsgdfg (Oct. 4, 2026 19:46:02)

NutOfCoco

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:
TheOfficialNussia wrote:
No support, shown fact?
“No support, obvious reason”

It should be “All opposition, vague irrationality.”

purplebunny63

NutOfCoco wrote:
gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:
TheOfficialNussia wrote:
No support, shown fact?
“No support, obvious reason”
It should be “All opposition, vague irrationality.”

It should be “Yes opposition, hidden opinion”

Last edited by purplebunny63 (Oct. 4, 2026 20:20:00)

NutOfCoco

purplebunny63 wrote:
NutOfCoco wrote:
gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:
TheOfficialNussia wrote:
No support, shown fact?
“No support, obvious reason”
It should be “All opposition, vague irrationality.”
It should be “Yes opposition, hidden opinion”

Yes is not the only antonym of no, and hidden opinion is definitely not the opposite of obvious reason.

LittleGreyCells

Please keep discussion centered on the suggestion itself, not only examples of the hilarity/confusion it could cause

TheOfficialNussia

LittleGreyCells wrote:
Please keep discussion centered on the suggestion itself, not only examples of the hilarity/confusion it could cause

Lol/ciq

Haycat2009

Extreme and unconditional support. This is genius.

Scratch_Cat_Coder8

No support.
This can easily create issues. “You aren’t going to birth me” can easily be antonymed into… you know what

I_wantasheep

Scratch_Cat_Coder8 wrote:
No support.
This can easily create issues. “You aren’t going to birth me” can easily be antonymed into… you know what

they were gone from die you

Last edited by I_wantasheep (Oct. 5, 2026 09:42:02)

CaptFrIEdshrimp

Really? this shouldn't destroy communication without others off scratch.
Try to understand that.
OG text: Really? This should make communication with others on scratch.
No support, it makes talking harder. And can make texting crazy.

I_wantasheep

CaptFrIEdshrimp wrote:
Really? this shouldn't destroy communication without others off scratch.
Try to understand that.
OG text: Really? This should make communication with others on scratch.
No support, it makes talking harder. And can make texting crazy.

“that should create incommunication with themselves on python” i think im not sure

CSwitch

LittleGreyCells* wrote:
Please keep discussion centered on the suggestion itself, not only examples of the hilarity/confusion it could cause

BW_CA_26

No because “move () steps” blocks could become “stay still () halt” or something, which would be confusing for people who just joined on April Fools day (because yes, some people are serious on a day dedicated to jokes & things).

CSwitch

BW_CA_26 wrote:
No because “move () steps” blocks could become “stay still () halt” or something, which would be confusing for people who just joined on April Fools day (because yes, some people are serious on a day dedicated to jokes & things).

^ This.

Discuss Scratch