Apologies if this has been linked/mentioned before, but lifting or reducing the ban around sliding around in a sewer (you know what I'm talking about :P) seems to be rejected

eikh2 wrote:

can we stop talking about the title

Free speech is dying #vivalavida

We Should make this block called
run ::events

thisblock will be useful
run green flag ::events

NormalCoder23 wrote:

We Should make this block called
run ::events

NormalCoder23 wrote:

thisblock will be useful
run green flag ::events

The stickies are not a place to suggest suggestions.

Catscratcher07 wrote:

bitmap_caketin wrote:

Does this fall under 8.3?

If it was about reverting to Scratchr2, it would, but it is explicitly not about that. It seems to be about the order and screen real estate of the topics covered on the page.

Yeah sry for that im just garbage at explaining it LOL (I didn't know how else to explain it and it's actually harder to explain than I thought before making the topic omg)

eikh2 wrote:

can we stop talking about the title

How are we still talking about it xD

cookirde wrote:

bitmap_caketin wrote:

Does this fall under 8.3?

I think this is 8.4 more than 8.3. 8.3 is editor and 8.4 is website and the thread you listed is contact us

Ok I tried to clarify what I meant here I don't mean exactly like that
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/9371211/

My topic on deleting the Suggestions subforum got rejected

Cheezzychiknzzz wrote:

My topic on deleting the Suggestions subforum got rejected

That used to be on the old list until @Za-Chary removed it for being not suggested frequently. I would argue that these days this is more suggested than a screen time alert or money blocks, but on the other hand, it seems a bit counter-intuitive to make a suggestion in the Suggestions forum about removing the Suggestions forum.

MythosLore wrote:

Cheezzychiknzzz wrote:

My topic on deleting the Suggestions subforum got rejected

That used to be on the old list until @Za-Chary removed it for being not suggested frequently. I would argue that these days this is more suggested than a screen time alert or money blocks, but on the other hand, it seems a bit counter-intuitive to make a suggestion in the Suggestions forum about removing the Suggestions forum.

which is why we should remove the whole website instead
remove scratch from scratch

ilIusionator wrote:

MythosLore wrote:

Cheezzychiknzzz wrote:

My topic on deleting the Suggestions subforum got rejected

That used to be on the old list until @Za-Chary removed it for being not suggested frequently. I would argue that these days this is more suggested than a screen time alert or money blocks, but on the other hand, it seems a bit counter-intuitive to make a suggestion in the Suggestions forum about removing the Suggestions forum.

which is why we should remove the whole website instead
remove scratch from scratch

W H A T

Rejected suggestion 3.1 mentions a link to something related to 1.13, so instead of a link to a post, make it redirect to 1.13 by going like “for more information, see #1.13.

Also, in 7.2 in the paragraph about becoming a moderator, it should also say ”Careers" since that's what if used in 3.0 pages

idea: rejected suggestion 3.6 but the person who made/is making the project can decide if people can view it (default setting is others cannot view it) (although it COULD just be a version of the game with just a thumbnail and the instructions and notes and credits, no comments allowed on it)

i hath learned you can type 200,000 chars…
oh noes >

DifferentDance8 wrote:

Apologies if this has been linked/mentioned before, but lifting or reducing the ban around sliding around in a sewer (you know what I'm talking about :P) seems to be rejected

This was already brought up closer to its time of rejection, I think I have seen some simular suggestions since, but, as Za-Chary stated when it was brought up, “it's probably best not to add more mentions of (you-know-what) here.”

MythosLore wrote:

Cheezzychiknzzz wrote:

My topic on deleting the Suggestions subforum got rejected

That used to be on the old list until @Za-Chary removed it for being not suggested frequently. I would argue that these days this is more suggested than a screen time alert or money blocks, but on the other hand, it seems a bit counter-intuitive to make a suggestion in the Suggestions forum about removing the Suggestions forum.

It wasn't just that it wasn't suggested frequently, it was also that most such suggestions were not made in good faith and would not be effectively reduced by putting them on the list. I still think that is the case, and it is not necessary to add it to the list at this time.

WigglyJoey wrote:

Rejected suggestion 3.1 mentions a link to something related to 1.13, so instead of a link to a post, make it redirect to 1.13 by going like “for more information, see #1.13.

Also, in 7.2 in the paragraph about becoming a moderator, it should also say ”Careers" since that's what if used in 3.0 pages

I have implemented these changes, but 7.2 now mentions both Jobs and Careers as 2.0 pages still use jobs.

nebula_cats wrote:

idea: rejected suggestion 3.6 but the person who made/is making the project can decide if people can view it (default setting is others cannot view it) (although it COULD just be a version of the game with just a thumbnail and the instructions and notes and credits, no comments allowed on it)

I'm not sure what you are suggesting, but either it belongs in its own topic, or it falls under the rejection on “unlisted” projects mentioned in 4.1.

Catscratcher07 wrote:

MythosLore wrote:

Cheezzychiknzzz wrote:

My topic on deleting the Suggestions subforum got rejected

That used to be on the old list until @Za-Chary removed it for being not suggested frequently. I would argue that these days this is more suggested than a screen time alert or money blocks, but on the other hand, it seems a bit counter-intuitive to make a suggestion in the Suggestions forum about removing the Suggestions forum.

It wasn't just that it wasn't suggested frequently, it was also that most such suggestions were not made in good faith and would not be effectively reduced by putting them on the list. I still think that is the case, and it is not necessary to add it to the list at this time.

My topic was made in response of the fact that many topics were closed due to the restrictions of the subforum, and even if they are still open, only a small handful get accepted. In fact, I might be wrong, but I think suggestions on github are more likely to get accepted than in this subforum. Plus, I believe this forum is a source of conflict (and therefore distrust) between Scratchers and Scratch Team and Scratchers and fellow Scratchers. I was somewhat serious about this even though I know it may be rejected, what is the purpose of the “(yes, I am serious)” text in title after all? If this topic is rejected then it doesn't hurt to at least add it to the list to inform other disgruntled Scratchers

didn't scratch already remove studio activity messages anyway?

CTLegendz_Returns wrote:

didn't scratch already remove studio activity messages anyway?

It's still unknown whether that was deliberate or a bug

couldn't the goto block become a reverse C block? like this:

if <> then
this block.......................|
stuff that gets repeated |
return to........................|
end