can you add ai blocks? ai blocks name: ai blocks color: #0FBD8C blocks: create chatbot named (MyChatbot) delete all chatbots ask chatbot (what's the weather?) (ai response) <chatbot (MyChatbot) exists?> <did chatbot respond?> set language to (spanish) set maximum length to (500 v) (chatbot language) (chatbot maximum length)

So you imagine :

Create chatbot named [MyChatbot] :: #0FBD8C

Delete all chatbots :: #0FBD8C

Ask [what’s the weather] to chatbot [MyChatbot] :: #0FBD8C

Ai response :: ring #0FBD8C

Chatbot [MyChatbot] exists ? :: boolean #0FBD8C

Set language to ( Spanish v) :: #0FBD8C

Set maximum length to (500) :: #0FBD8C

Chatbot ( language v) :: ring #0FBD8C
Chatbot (max length v) :: ring #0FBD8C

Ok… so now, I have some questions :
Which model use ? An existing model like GPT or Llama ? Or a house-made model which need training and data ?
Who paid for this ? Are the quotas of tokens unlimited ?
This would be very ressources-heavy

This should go into the suggestions page I'm going to have to report this for notable reasons if you might just want to copy paste this bye I don't know 10 minutes report

But this is actually such good idea

Horrible idea, Scratch can't guarantee the safety of it if it is powered by an existing ai, and also that would cost money that Scratch does not have.

No thanks

scratch labs did used to have this at some point, but it was a hidden link for a while until it was discovered in some forum post but because the ai blocks don't work anymore the link to it doesn't work anymore so idk

OhOkSir12345 wrote:

scratch labs did used to have this at some point, but it was a hidden link for a while until it was discovered in some forum post but because the ai blocks don't work anymore the link to it doesn't work anymore so idk

It was removed because testing it costs money.

I believe this would be a good idea, though fronting the cost of API credits may be troublesome when a lot of people are using it.

NutOfCoco wrote:

Horrible idea, Scratch can't guarantee the safety of it if it is powered by an existing ai

I don't believe that it will have safety concerns beyond what normal Scratch does because AI doesn't really say vulgar things or bring up sensitive topics unless it is explicitly asked. essentially if a project makes the AI say something bad then it can be reported and it wouldn't be worse than what normal things (eg, putting a swear word in a sprite) can already do, and if the user prompts a benign project to have the AI say bad words then they have nobody to blame but themselves.

To add onto this, I think that these would be some good features to have, were this to be implemented:

Set [ai v] mode to [reply v] :: #0FBD8C //only sends system prompt and input, like a raw API would
Set [ai v] mode to [conversation v] :: #0FBD8C //also uses past messages and responses, like a chatgpt window does
 ([ai]'s [last response]:: #0FBD8C)
([ai]'s [whole conversation]:: #0FBD8C)

uhh support
assuming this was a very advanced homemade ai that doesn't use water or other stuff

No support, Scratch is a nonprofit and having multiple AI chatbot per second stressing the servers would be EXPENSIVE.
Also, environmental concerns among other stuff

No support, scratch is not meant to have ai

._.