axalotlautomaster_2 wrote:

do you have a link to the topic?

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

No, AI won't be added, at least to the point where little Noah isn't making his/her entire project with AI

sup3r_r0ck wrote:

They are not adding an ai project generator and the ai that post was talking about was cancelled.

Vadik1 wrote:

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

No, AI won't be added, at least to the point where little Noah isn't making his/her entire project with AI

sup3r_r0ck wrote:

They are not adding an ai project generator and the ai that post was talking about was cancelled.

That's not what robloxnoob27 is asking about.
robloxnoob27 is asking about the claim of codubee that Scratch Team have seemingly already started using AI to retroactively scan public projects for presence of anything inappropriate hidden within projects (and then likely automatically reporting them, even if no human reports them).
At least that's how I understood it.

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

Vadik1 wrote:

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

No, AI won't be added, at least to the point where little Noah isn't making his/her entire project with AI

sup3r_r0ck wrote:

They are not adding an ai project generator and the ai that post was talking about was cancelled.

That's not what robloxnoob27 is asking about.
robloxnoob27 is asking about the claim of codubee that Scratch Team have seemingly already started using AI to retroactively scan public projects for presence of anything inappropriate hidden within projects (and then likely automatically reporting them, even if no human reports them).
At least that's how I understood it.

That's not anywhere in the linked post, and the image is broken

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

That's not anywhere in the linked post, and the image is broken

Vadik1 wrote:

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

That's not anywhere in the linked post, and the image is broken

The image is not broken. It's given as a link without https:// at the beginning, so scratch doesn't recognize it as a link and doesn't make it clickable.
Nevertheless, it's a valid link, and if you manually copy-paste it into the browser's url bar, it opens fine, because browser adds https:// automatically.

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

Vadik1 wrote:

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

That's not anywhere in the linked post, and the image is broken

The image is not broken. It's given as a link without https:// at the beginning, so scratch doesn't recognize it as a link and doesn't make it clickable.
Nevertheless, it's a valid link, and if you manually copy-paste it into the browser's url bar, it opens fine, because browser adds https:// automatically.

No I know how forums work. I mean it isn't pre rendered when I put it into an img tag
To OP: I don't know but if so how would it negatively impact Scratch?

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

Vadik1 wrote:

r3hehehehehhe wrote:

That's not anywhere in the linked post, and the image is broken

The image is not broken. It's given as a link without https:// at the beginning, so scratch doesn't recognize it as a link and doesn't make it clickable.
Nevertheless, it's a valid link, and if you manually copy-paste it into the browser's url bar, it opens fine, because browser adds https:// automatically.

No I know how forums work. I mean it isn't pre rendered when I put it into an img tag
To OP: I don't know but if so how would it negatively impact Scratch?

codubee wrote:

sup3r_r0ck wrote:

Ok yeah I’m confused, I need codubee to just state what they’re doing with Ai because I have literally no clue what’s going on

I'm not going to do that, because, as I've said multiple times in this thread, we're continuing to iterate on designs for it and unfortunately, I'm not going to come out and say “We'll not be using AI anytime soon” because that's false. We're already making use of our new tooling to help surface content issues with projects, to help moderators catch things buried/hidden inside projects.