-FeaturedAvatar- wrote:

is there not an archive.org of Scratch?

If <(correct ::sensing)=true> then
haha ::events
else
noooooooo ::events

expierement

when [ timer] > (1)
ask [is scratch for here?] and wait
if <[(answer)] = [yes]> then
play sound [partaaay!]
say [yay]
end

Chargedragon wrote:

Scratch 4.0 is coming, and I can prove it:

You would have to consider the timeline.
Scratch 0.1: 2003
Scratch 1.0: 2007
Scratch 1.4: 2009
Scratch 2.0: 2013
Scratch 3.0: 2019
Scratch 4.0: 2026?

Some people say it will not come out anytime soon
Their wrong

If <(correct ::sensing)=true> then
haha ::events
else
noooooooo ::events

Thank you for your time

expierement

TweetytheBird93 wrote:

Chargedragon wrote:

Scratch 4.0 is coming, and I can prove it:

You would have to consider the timeline.
Scratch 0.1: 2003
Scratch 1.0: 2007
Scratch 1.4: 2009
Scratch 2.0: 2013
Scratch 3.0: 2019
Scratch 4.0: 2026?

Some people say it will not come out anytime soon
Their wrong

If <(correct ::sensing)=true> then
haha ::events
else
noooooooo ::events

Thank you for your time

expierement

just because a major scratch version came out every 6 years doesn't mean that scratch 4.0 will release 6 years after scratch 3.0. in fact it's been 7 years since 3.0 released now (god i'm old)
also scratch 1.4 isn't a major version of scratch and typically people exclude scratch 0.1
the 6 year gap between versions is just sheer coincidence, if you actually looked into it scratch 2.0 has been developed as early as september 2009 and scratch 3.0 has been developed as early as 2016

IceBlockStudios wrote:

Yall, I can't help but feel like all the student account messages about student accounts being deleted has something to do with Scratch 4.0… I just can't put my finger on it… Does this mean we're getting a reworking of that stuff? That would be interesting to see.

-FeaturedAvatar- wrote:

I think everyone isn't understanding the “AI.” This isn't going to be a vibe-coding situation. It is going to be an AI that is designed to let users learn and grow, and it might help make sprites in vector.

TweetytheBird93 wrote:

-FeaturedAvatar- wrote:

I think everyone isn't understanding the “AI.” This isn't going to be a vibe-coding situation. It is going to be an AI that is designed to let users learn and grow, and it might help make sprites in vector.

^ truthnuke
—————————————————
the scratch ai is specifically designed to help you figure out what's wrong with your code, like a tutor trying to help you with mistakes. it won't actually do the work for you, the whole point of scratch is so you can learn how to program
not sure about the vector part though

gem1001 wrote:

TweetytheBird93 wrote:

snap

Why are we behaving like we know anything about the AI

reallysoftuser wrote:

gem1001 wrote:

TweetytheBird93 wrote:

snap

Why are we behaving like we know anything about the AI

Because there was an entire Scratch Conference dedicated to it? lol.

TweetytheBird93 wrote:

-FeaturedAvatar- wrote:

I think everyone isn't understanding the “AI.” This isn't going to be a vibe-coding situation. It is going to be an AI that is designed to let users learn and grow, and it might help make sprites in vector.

^ truthnuke
—————————————————
the scratch ai is specifically designed to help you figure out what's wrong with your code, like a tutor trying to help you with mistakes. it won't actually do the work for you, the whole point of scratch is so you can learn how to program
not sure about the vector part though

gem1001 wrote:

reallysoftuser wrote:

gem1001 wrote:

TweetytheBird93 wrote:

snap

Why are we behaving like we know anything about the AI

Because there was an entire Scratch Conference dedicated to it? lol.

Specifically the AI 8 months ago. Lots has changed since then.

reallysoftuser wrote:

gem1001 wrote:

reallysoftuser wrote:

gem1001 wrote:

TweetytheBird93 wrote:

snap

Why are we behaving like we know anything about the AI

Because there was an entire Scratch Conference dedicated to it? lol.

Specifically the AI 8 months ago. Lots has changed since then.

What has specifically changed?

codubee wrote:

If by native, you mean electron based, then yes. I'd say there is also a decent chance that tooling like Claude may help us turn it into a fully native app.