I have always been wanting to have a built in option in scratch where you can invite other scratch users to collaborate with you but it still doesnt exist, Scratch is now introducing AI but not collaboration, One of you will be like : But you could literally do that by just remixing the project! Me be like: But then its not private and 2. I would want real time collaboration.

Currently I use a service called Gandi IDE that lets you have much more features and real time collaboration

Real time collab. is rejected:

Za-Chary/TOLORS wrote:

2.1 Adding users to work on projects
Having multiple Scratchers work on the same project would be difficult to moderate not only due to technological limitations but also because it could lead to private messaging; for more information, see #8.1 on this list. This includes live editing (similar to Google Docs) and other forms of private collaboration. If you would like to work on a project with another Scratcher, you can remix each others' projects.

At the moment, a turn-based collaboration system for shared projects is NOT rejected.

Sorry, but this is rejected:

TOLORS wrote:

2.1 Adding users to work on projects
Having multiple Scratchers work on the same project would be difficult to moderate not only due to technological limitations but also because it could lead to private messaging; for more information, see #8.1 on this list. This includes live editing (similar to Google Docs) and other forms of private collaboration. If you would like to work on a project with another Scratcher, you can remix each others' projects.

Please read the official list of rejected suggestions before making a new suggestion.

Also, adding users to work in projects can lead to private messaging, which is mentioned above. Private messaging is bad because it can be easy to share personal info without over 99.9% of the community seeing, which is a big no since scratchers should report ANYTHING that is inappropriate.

0_009 wrote:

Sorry, but this is rejected:

TOLORS wrote:

2.1 Adding users to work on projects
Having multiple Scratchers work on the same project would be difficult to moderate not only due to technological limitations but also because it could lead to private messaging; for more information, see #8.1 on this list. This includes live editing (similar to Google Docs) and other forms of private collaboration. If you would like to work on a project with another Scratcher, you can remix each others' projects.

Please read the official list of rejected suggestions before making a new suggestion.

Also, adding users to work in projects can lead to private messaging, which is mentioned above. Private messaging is bad because it can be easy to share personal info without over 99.9% of the community seeing, which is a big no since scratchers should report ANYTHING that is inappropriate.

They could just add text filters for code and editor and name and description for unshared and shared projects

Schooluser1010 wrote:

0_009 wrote:

Sorry, but this is rejected:

TOLORS wrote:

2.1 Adding users to work on projects
Having multiple Scratchers work on the same project would be difficult to moderate not only due to technological limitations but also because it could lead to private messaging; for more information, see #8.1 on this list. This includes live editing (similar to Google Docs) and other forms of private collaboration. If you would like to work on a project with another Scratcher, you can remix each others' projects.

Please read the official list of rejected suggestions before making a new suggestion.

Also, adding users to work in projects can lead to private messaging, which is mentioned above. Private messaging is bad because it can be easy to share personal info without over 99.9% of the community seeing, which is a big no since scratchers should report ANYTHING that is inappropriate.

They could just add text filters for code and editor and name and description for unshared and shared projects

Drawing stuff in sprites is too hard to filter, so it'd still be rejected
And anyway, given how many times people have tried to suggest this, someone has probably thought of that