Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Things I'm Reading and Playing
- » Snap...... but better
- water_endermanYT
-
Scratcher
36 posts
Snap...... but better
Snap is an alternative to scratch with more complicated features…
but tell me why it looks like its straight out of 2007? IT LOOKS SOO BAD
I would use snap ON THE DAILY if it actually looked like scratch 3.0
but tell me why it looks like its straight out of 2007? IT LOOKS SOO BAD
I would use snap ON THE DAILY if it actually looked like scratch 3.0
- -gr
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap...... but better
First of all, this doesn't seem like a suggestion of anything to add or change about Scratch.
Secondly, you can see in this Snap! forum post that the reason Snap!'s editor looks so similar to Scratch 1.4 is because that's the style they prefer.
Snap! used to be based on Scratch in an older version called BYOB, but it's now independent from Scratch's code.
Secondly, you can see in this Snap! forum post that the reason Snap!'s editor looks so similar to Scratch 1.4 is because that's the style they prefer.
Snap! used to be based on Scratch in an older version called BYOB, but it's now independent from Scratch's code.
- gdfsgdfsgdfg
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap...... but better
i’m pretty sure it’s actually a combination of both Scratch 1.0 and Scratch 2.0 beta
- medians
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Snap...... but better
Not exactly the same thing, but I could have sworn that there was a light mode flat design option. However, it's been a long time since I've used Snap! and they could have removed it or it could have just not been there in the first place bc I can't find it
- water_endermanYT
-
Scratcher
36 posts
Snap...... but better
Secondly, you can see in this Snap! forum post that the reason Snap!'s editor looks so similar to Scratch 1.4 is because that's the style they prefer.
It could be an option to change the look! Also, yeah i kinda agree its not really a suggestion but idk where else to put this
- Discussion Forums
- » Things I'm Reading and Playing
-
» Snap...... but better