Are 2026, some social media have AÍ Grok, Gemini, Chat GPT, Dola, Pleprexity, Bixby, Alexa+, etc.
Let's create an AI for Scratch the name Will Be Itch and the color green. You Can choose other name of want.

AI Search and voice search:
You can search things like: Show me portuguese projects and more
Ask for AI:
You can make help with AI
AI Image and video Generation

Za-Chary wrote:

2.8 AI image generation in Scratch
The Scratch Team has experimented with AI image generation for Scratch in the past. There are benefits for enhancing creativity, including making it easier for Scratchers to make the costumes they want for their projects, as well as inspiring Scratchers to make new stories based on the images they generate. However, there are also many downsides, including ethical concerns arising from AI images using copyrighted material, biases present in AI which reinforce harmful stereotypes, the ease of creating inappropriate content, and the difficulty of accessing AI. For these reasons, the Scratch Team has stated that they will not be adding AI image generation to Scratch anytime soon. For more information, see this article.

However, the use of AI as a virtual assistant is NOT rejected. You can discuss it on this topic. In general, AI in Scratch is not entirely rejected; it depends on the specific use of the AI.

Also, note that the use of AI images in Scratch projects is allowed; for more information, see #3.7 on this list.

Wait, what? Rejected? Just add an Gulideness for AI Generation and ban NFE Images.

Guidelines aren't going to prevent inappropriate content being made, and given how quick it is for AI to generate inappropriate content, I doubt it would be reported and taken down in due time. Also, even if they programmed the AI to not generate inappropriate images, that would still be very easy to bypass. I don't think your solution would resolve the issues that make this suggestion rejected in the first place.

8xa wrote:

Guidelines aren't going to prevent inappropriate content being made, and given how quick it is for AI to generate inappropriate content, I doubt it would be reported and taken down in due time. Also, even if they programmed the AI to not generate inappropriate images, that would still be very easy to bypass. I don't think your solution would resolve the issues that make this suggestion rejected in the first place.

If You try to generate an NFE image In Chat GPT he Will Say: “I can't make this image because was inapropiate”

um actually, some “llms” you mentioned are based on other llms :nerd: :point-up: /j
—
in all seriousness
why do we need another llm if theres alot of hate against AI

IForgotMyPasswordAAH wrote:

8xa wrote:

Guidelines aren't going to prevent inappropriate content being made, and given how quick it is for AI to generate inappropriate content, I doubt it would be reported and taken down in due time. Also, even if they programmed the AI to not generate inappropriate images, that would still be very easy to bypass. I don't think your solution would resolve the issues that make this suggestion rejected in the first place.

If You try to generate an NFE image In Chat GPT he Will Say: “I can't make this image because was inapropiate”

That's what I was referring to in my post, which I've now made bold in the quote
I've seen people bypass ChatGPT's boundaries by cleverly wording their prompts and not making it clear to the AI what their intentions are. I'd rather just not risk that happening at all.
Also, there are other moral, legal and ethical problems with AI that I'm willing to go into more detail with if you want.

On top of the image generation being rejected, would this suggestion not also be a duplicate?

DarthVader4Life wrote:

On top of the image generation being rejected, would this suggestion not also be a duplicate?

Thanks for the link! It does look like this is a duplicate topic so I'll close it to keep the conversation all in one place.

Please use the existing topic in the link above.

I hesitate to claim that anything about AI and Scratch are rejected at this point as the situation seems to be quite fluid.