StikminX wrote:

That might take a lot of effort and money, Scratch is also non-profitable. no support.

Offtopic: can you say nonprofitable or is that incorrect English?
im sorry i really needed to ask

unmissable wrote:

StikminX wrote:

That might take a lot of effort and money, Scratch is also non-profitable. no support.

Offtopic: can you say nonprofitable or is that incorrect English?
im sorry i really needed to ask

sure.

unmissable wrote:

StikminX wrote:

That might take a lot of effort and money, Scratch is also non-profitable. no support.

Offtopic: can you say nonprofitable or is that incorrect English?
im sorry i really needed to ask

yes
edit: ninja

Dupe https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/339578/

-nvm-

Roblox888i wrote:

Dupe https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/339578/

It’s the same link, stop necroposting

ilikescratch7169 wrote:

Roblox888i wrote:

Dupe https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/339578/

It’s the same link, stop necroposting

A. Necropost ain't in suggestions.
B. MY TOPIC GOT MERGED HERE

moved below.

ilikescratch7169 wrote:

Roblox888i wrote:

Dupe https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/339578/

It’s the same link, stop necroposting

not a necropost, that is what you did.

(Dupe moment)

I miss this feature—while I have it with my extension, I would be happy to see it in vanilla again. While I'm not visually impaired, it can make looking at the editor easier, and is great for some visually impaired people. Full support.

Bump because a dupe appeared.

The_Blue_J wrote:

medians wrote:

The_Blue_J wrote:

You have no idea how many scratchers want to hide their code from others…

Scratch embraces remix culture, and so should all it's scratchers, with this suggestion, a scratcher might make their blocks white effectively making them invisible to the human eye( hugh contrast doesn't help much…)

Why would it show the same thing for everyone?? That wouldn’t make sense. And the original poster stated:

106809nes wrote:

Stated it earlier. Anyone who sees inside a different project that isn't theirs, you would just see your own block colors.

Oh…

Also, I'm late, but the block text could be black if the block color used is light enough, like how the high contrast blocks already are. Bringing this topic up.

ithcus wrote:

not really against it, but i'm not for this especially either

i don't get how this would improve scratch??

we got already different colored blocks for different sections and that works well. why would we need more color options? just for aesthetic purposes?

1. People could use it for aesthetic reasons, but that isn't the only reason. I honestly do not like the 3.0 block look lol
2. The high contrast blocks don't really seem to help with any type of colorblindness (as seen through multiple simulators). There's also multiple types of colorblindness, and one extra option might not work for all types.
3. I don't know about other people, but the 3.0 blocks hurt my eyes, and can be hard to read for me (both high contrast and the regular ones)

gatgatcode wrote:

i would say this is kinda pointless other than aesthetic. but do we really need this bc you can you the extension.

People might be unable to install extensions if their device has restrictions, and it's harder on mobile. Also, those extensions aren't official. Also, there are other reasons outside of aesthetics.

medians wrote:

ithcus wrote:

not really against it, but i'm not for this especially either

i don't get how this would improve scratch??

we got already different colored blocks for different sections and that works well. why would we need more color options? just for aesthetic purposes?

1. People could use it for aesthetic reasons, but that isn't the only reason. I honestly do not like the 3.0 block look lol
2. The high contrast blocks don't really seem to help with any type of colorblindness (as seen through multiple simulators). There's also multiple types of colorblindness, and one extra option might not work for all types.
3. I don't know about other people, but the 3.0 blocks hurt my eyes, and can be hard to read for me (both high contrast and the regular ones)

gatgatcode wrote:

i would say this is kinda pointless other than aesthetic. but do we really need this bc you can you the extension.

People might be unable to install extensions if their device has restrictions, and it's harder on mobile. Also, those extensions aren't official. Also, there are other reasons outside of aesthetics.

Also nono word doesn't run on all browsers

Bringing this topic up