davidtheplatform wrote:

If you actually look it up on stackoverflow

davidtheplatform wrote:

Rule 110 is turing complete (If you're going to argue this point I don't think you know what turing completeness is).

davidtheplatform wrote:

there doesn’t seem to be a consensus

Stegie1234 wrote:

qwertyy_the_artist wrote:

…
alr that's enough of that. the answer was css, and it's a turing-complete language.

CSS by itself is not technically turing-complete. Look it up on google or stackoverflow. You can’t end an argument with a false statement and expect no-one to correct it.

davidtheplatform wrote:

Stegie1234 wrote:

qwertyy_the_artist wrote:

…
alr that's enough of that. the answer was css, and it's a turing-complete language.

CSS by itself is not technically turing-complete. Look it up on google or stackoverflow. You can’t end an argument with a false statement and expect no-one to correct it.

If you actually look it up on stackoverflow, you can read pages of comments arguing over whether it's turing complete but there doesn't seem to be a consensus.
Rule 110 is turing complete (If you're going to argue this point I don't think you know what turing completeness is). Rule 110 is as set of rules that tells you how to change a string of 1's and 0's. It requires someone to actually follow those rules and change the 1's and 0's. By itself, rule 110 can't do anything since it's just some numbers and symbols. A CSS document is the same, it's a set of rules that tells you how to modify an HTML document. The only difference is that both a human and a computer are involved in running these rules, but the human isn't making any decisions.
btw I'm basing this off an implementation where all you had to do was press tab and space repeatedly, instead of the more common “click all the highlighted boxes” version.

julmik6478 wrote:

Antarctic Bird version of scratch
beacuse it's not allowed to be mentioned on scratch, you can't guess it without chanse for getting reported

julmik6478 wrote:

Programming language with same colors as Ukraine flag

qwertyy_the_artist wrote:

you guys, does it even matter anymore? it's just a fun game about guessing the programming language

julmik6478 wrote:

Programming language with same colors as Ukraine flag

PaxtonPenguin wrote:

All the examples are UPPERCASE, was before C, inspired C, and came from a language that didn't come out.

qwertyy_the_artist wrote:

julmik6478 wrote:

Programming language with same colors as Ukraine flag

python?

Stegie1234 wrote:

julmik6478 wrote:

Programming language with same colors as Ukraine flag

python?

Stegie1234 wrote:

I don’t think it ever really mattered. At least, not enough to write a whole paragraph about it (some people really want to be correct, don’t they? ).

PaxtonPenguin wrote:

All the examples are UPPERCASE, was before C, inspired C, and came from a language that didn't come out.

Stegie1234 wrote:

PaxtonPenguin wrote:

All the examples are UPPERCASE, was before C, inspired C, and came from a language that didn't come out.

BASIC? Fortran? Although, Fortran isn’t case-sensitive, and neither are most versions of BASIC.

qwertyy_the_artist wrote:

PaxtonPenguin wrote:

All the examples are UPPERCASE, was before C, inspired C, and came from a language that didn't come out.

COBOL? that's an all-caps language, and it (kinda) looks like it could've inspired C

-TwentyFour- wrote:

A traingle called as an ocean animal, moves as you tell and leaves a trail line only when you tell so.

NFlex23 wrote:

-TwentyFour- wrote:

A traingle called as an ocean animal, moves as you tell and leaves a trail line only when you tell so.

Sounds like turtle graphics, though I'm not sure if it counts as a language.

-TwentyFour- wrote:

A traingle called as an ocean animal, moves as you tell and leaves a trail line only when you tell so.

ajskateboarder wrote:

ML version of a version of a popular language that runs all Blu-ray players

qwertyy_the_artist wrote:

rdococ wrote:

a language that thinks it's an OS

i'm stumped, but i assume it must be low-level

TechNerd64 wrote:

rdococ wrote:

a language that thinks it's an OS

BASIC?

rdococ wrote:

a language that thinks it's an OS