scratchcommunication - a python library made for communication between scratch projects and python servers

ajskateboarder

Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?

-unrelated-

ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?

What is that?

<!DOCTYPE html>

ajskateboarder

-unrelated- wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?
What is that?

It's a stronger encryption than SHA-256. There's also stronger algorithms, like argon2

-unrelated-

ajskateboarder wrote:
-unrelated- wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?
What is that?
It's a stronger encryption than SHA-256. There's also stronger algorithms, like argon2

Oh! You mean a cryptographic hash function.

<!DOCTYPE html>

davidtheplatform

ajskateboarder wrote:
-unrelated- wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?
What is that?
It's a stronger encryption than SHA-256. There's also stronger algorithms, like argon2

Those are all hashing algorithms. Also hashing in scratch is probably too slow to be of much use

Generation 4: the first time you see this copy and paste it on top of your sig in the scratch forums and increase generation by 1. Social experiment.

dynamicsofscratch

davidtheplatform wrote:
(#25)
ajskateboarder wrote:
-unrelated- wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?
What is that?
It's a stronger encryption than SHA-256. There's also stronger algorithms, like argon2
Those are all hashing algorithms. Also hashing in scratch is probably too slow to be of much use

yeah. also, sha-256 is really hard to crack and probably enough for scratch.

aII toasters toast toast, but what happens when there are no longer toasters being produced? will their technology simply become obsolete, with humans moving onto bigger, better things? will toast become a distant memory, written in textbooks of the future as foods us simpler generations ate? who's to say! society is constantly moving, changing, evolving, ideas being built upon, improved upon, theories being proven or disproven. are we but a blip on the timeline? sure, our names may not be remembered, but that's not the point. you can make a change. you can make a difference. you can make the world better, even if you don't know yet. and the first step is to go for it. even if you are afraid of failure. going back to the example of toasters, do you know off the top of your head who invented them? no? have you used one? probably. so, even if you don't remember my name, if I was able to help awnser your question, that is enough. if I was able to help you, even in the slightest way, this could push you to continue with scratch and not give up after the program crashes, and maybe one day learn other programming languages and change the world. everything is a cause and effect reaction, new inventions lead to the technology of the future, and even as the generations of the past are slowly forgotten, their influence lives on to this day, affecting how the world eventually turned out and how it will be for generations to come.

and, without toasters, we wouldn't have toast.

Regards
dynamicsofscratch

Anything above that grey line is a signature!
Also, anything can be put in your signature, (also referred as a siggy) including ads but! You cannot do anything else that violates the community guidelines as, you will be reported and you could be banned/muted.
Computer enthusiast, coder, designer and a offline veteran.
700th post

-unrelated-

dynamicsofscratch wrote:
davidtheplatform wrote:
(#25)
ajskateboarder wrote:
-unrelated- wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?
What is that?
It's a stronger encryption than SHA-256. There's also stronger algorithms, like argon2
Those are all hashing algorithms. Also hashing in scratch is probably too slow to be of much use
yeah. also, sha-256 is really hard to crack and probably enough for scratch.

You don't need a hash function I think

<!DOCTYPE html>

dynamicsofscratch

-unrelated- wrote:
(#27)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
davidtheplatform wrote:
(#25)
ajskateboarder wrote:
-unrelated- wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?
What is that?
It's a stronger encryption than SHA-256. There's also stronger algorithms, like argon2
Those are all hashing algorithms. Also hashing in scratch is probably too slow to be of much use
yeah. also, sha-256 is really hard to crack and probably enough for scratch.
You don't need a hash function I think

you do for security. imagine if you are logging in with password and everyone can just see it plain.

aII toasters toast toast, but what happens when there are no longer toasters being produced? will their technology simply become obsolete, with humans moving onto bigger, better things? will toast become a distant memory, written in textbooks of the future as foods us simpler generations ate? who's to say! society is constantly moving, changing, evolving, ideas being built upon, improved upon, theories being proven or disproven. are we but a blip on the timeline? sure, our names may not be remembered, but that's not the point. you can make a change. you can make a difference. you can make the world better, even if you don't know yet. and the first step is to go for it. even if you are afraid of failure. going back to the example of toasters, do you know off the top of your head who invented them? no? have you used one? probably. so, even if you don't remember my name, if I was able to help awnser your question, that is enough. if I was able to help you, even in the slightest way, this could push you to continue with scratch and not give up after the program crashes, and maybe one day learn other programming languages and change the world. everything is a cause and effect reaction, new inventions lead to the technology of the future, and even as the generations of the past are slowly forgotten, their influence lives on to this day, affecting how the world eventually turned out and how it will be for generations to come.

and, without toasters, we wouldn't have toast.

Regards
dynamicsofscratch

Anything above that grey line is a signature!
Also, anything can be put in your signature, (also referred as a siggy) including ads but! You cannot do anything else that violates the community guidelines as, you will be reported and you could be banned/muted.
Computer enthusiast, coder, designer and a offline veteran.
700th post

TheCommCraft

dynamicsofscratch wrote:
(#28)
-unrelated- wrote:
(#27)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
davidtheplatform wrote:
(#25)
ajskateboarder wrote:
-unrelated- wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?
What is that?
It's a stronger encryption than SHA-256. There's also stronger algorithms, like argon2
Those are all hashing algorithms. Also hashing in scratch is probably too slow to be of much use
yeah. also, sha-256 is really hard to crack and probably enough for scratch.
You don't need a hash function I think
you do for security. imagine if you are logging in with password and everyone can just see it plain.

But the transmition is encrypted. Of course you can use a hash function but I don't think it's necessary.

Random Project

spamton.gif

DUNGEON_EXPLORATION_03_02_23_01
COMPILED VERSION FOR HIGHER SPEED

dynamicsofscratch

TheCommCraft wrote:
(#29)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
(#28)
-unrelated- wrote:
(#27)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
davidtheplatform wrote:
(#25)
ajskateboarder wrote:
-unrelated- wrote:
ajskateboarder wrote:
(#21)
Very nice API. Not sure if it would be overkill, but maybe you should also support bcrypt?
What is that?
It's a stronger encryption than SHA-256. There's also stronger algorithms, like argon2
Those are all hashing algorithms. Also hashing in scratch is probably too slow to be of much use
yeah. also, sha-256 is really hard to crack and probably enough for scratch.
You don't need a hash function I think
you do for security. imagine if you are logging in with password and everyone can just see it plain.
But the transmission is encrypted. Of course you can use a hash function but I don't think it's necessary.

Yeah, that's why. The transmission is the place which needs to be secured and is most vulnerable. If the endpoints or communicators are not encrypting their data and data is getting leaked, that's the communicator's problem.

aII toasters toast toast, but what happens when there are no longer toasters being produced? will their technology simply become obsolete, with humans moving onto bigger, better things? will toast become a distant memory, written in textbooks of the future as foods us simpler generations ate? who's to say! society is constantly moving, changing, evolving, ideas being built upon, improved upon, theories being proven or disproven. are we but a blip on the timeline? sure, our names may not be remembered, but that's not the point. you can make a change. you can make a difference. you can make the world better, even if you don't know yet. and the first step is to go for it. even if you are afraid of failure. going back to the example of toasters, do you know off the top of your head who invented them? no? have you used one? probably. so, even if you don't remember my name, if I was able to help awnser your question, that is enough. if I was able to help you, even in the slightest way, this could push you to continue with scratch and not give up after the program crashes, and maybe one day learn other programming languages and change the world. everything is a cause and effect reaction, new inventions lead to the technology of the future, and even as the generations of the past are slowly forgotten, their influence lives on to this day, affecting how the world eventually turned out and how it will be for generations to come.

and, without toasters, we wouldn't have toast.

Regards
dynamicsofscratch

Anything above that grey line is a signature!
Also, anything can be put in your signature, (also referred as a siggy) including ads but! You cannot do anything else that violates the community guidelines as, you will be reported and you could be banned/muted.
Computer enthusiast, coder, designer and a offline veteran.
700th post

TheCommCraft

dynamicsofscratch wrote:
(#30)
TheCommCraft wrote:
(#29)
-snip-
Yeah, that's why. The transmission is the place which needs to be secured and is most vulnerable. If the endpoints or communicators are not encrypting their data and data is getting leaked, that's the communicator's problem.

So if the transmission is encrypted, then the hash function is not needed.

Random Project

spamton.gif

DUNGEON_EXPLORATION_03_02_23_01
COMPILED VERSION FOR HIGHER SPEED

dynamicsofscratch

TheCommCraft wrote:
(#31)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
(#30)
TheCommCraft wrote:
(#29)
-snip-
Yeah, that's why. The transmission is the place which needs to be secured and is most vulnerable. If the endpoints or communicators are not encrypting their data and data is getting leaked, that's the communicator's problem.
So if the transmission is encrypted, then the hash function is not needed.

hash function is needed to encrypt the data on the communicators end but, that's the least of scratchcommunciation's concerns

aII toasters toast toast, but what happens when there are no longer toasters being produced? will their technology simply become obsolete, with humans moving onto bigger, better things? will toast become a distant memory, written in textbooks of the future as foods us simpler generations ate? who's to say! society is constantly moving, changing, evolving, ideas being built upon, improved upon, theories being proven or disproven. are we but a blip on the timeline? sure, our names may not be remembered, but that's not the point. you can make a change. you can make a difference. you can make the world better, even if you don't know yet. and the first step is to go for it. even if you are afraid of failure. going back to the example of toasters, do you know off the top of your head who invented them? no? have you used one? probably. so, even if you don't remember my name, if I was able to help awnser your question, that is enough. if I was able to help you, even in the slightest way, this could push you to continue with scratch and not give up after the program crashes, and maybe one day learn other programming languages and change the world. everything is a cause and effect reaction, new inventions lead to the technology of the future, and even as the generations of the past are slowly forgotten, their influence lives on to this day, affecting how the world eventually turned out and how it will be for generations to come.

and, without toasters, we wouldn't have toast.

Regards
dynamicsofscratch

Anything above that grey line is a signature!
Also, anything can be put in your signature, (also referred as a siggy) including ads but! You cannot do anything else that violates the community guidelines as, you will be reported and you could be banned/muted.
Computer enthusiast, coder, designer and a offline veteran.
700th post

-unrelated-

dynamicsofscratch wrote:
TheCommCraft wrote:
(#31)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
(#30)
TheCommCraft wrote:
(#29)
-snip-
Yeah, that's why. The transmission is the place which needs to be secured and is most vulnerable. If the endpoints or communicators are not encrypting their data and data is getting leaked, that's the communicator's problem.
So if the transmission is encrypted, then the hash function is not needed.
hash function is needed to encrypt the data on the communicators end but, that's the least of scratchcommunciation's concerns

There is a hash function being used to create the key for the encryption but the encryption used is AES. To exchange the encryption key, RSA is used. Maybe I am misunderstanding but I don't think what you have said is correct. Also, what do you mean by that last statement?

<!DOCTYPE html>

dynamicsofscratch

-unrelated- wrote:
(#33)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
TheCommCraft wrote:
(#31)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
(#30)
TheCommCraft wrote:
(#29)
-snip-
Yeah, that's why. The transmission is the place which needs to be secured and is most vulnerable. If the endpoints or communicators are not encrypting their data and data is getting leaked, that's the communicator's problem.
So if the transmission is encrypted, then the hash function is not needed.
hash function is needed to encrypt the data on the communicators end but, that's the least of scratchcommunciation's concerns
There is a hash function being used to create the key for the encryption but the encryption used is AES. To exchange the encryption key, RSA is used. Maybe I am misunderstanding but I don't think what you have said is correct. Also, what do you mean by that last statement?

me getting confused all over again
the last statement is that wait what
visible confusion

aII toasters toast toast, but what happens when there are no longer toasters being produced? will their technology simply become obsolete, with humans moving onto bigger, better things? will toast become a distant memory, written in textbooks of the future as foods us simpler generations ate? who's to say! society is constantly moving, changing, evolving, ideas being built upon, improved upon, theories being proven or disproven. are we but a blip on the timeline? sure, our names may not be remembered, but that's not the point. you can make a change. you can make a difference. you can make the world better, even if you don't know yet. and the first step is to go for it. even if you are afraid of failure. going back to the example of toasters, do you know off the top of your head who invented them? no? have you used one? probably. so, even if you don't remember my name, if I was able to help awnser your question, that is enough. if I was able to help you, even in the slightest way, this could push you to continue with scratch and not give up after the program crashes, and maybe one day learn other programming languages and change the world. everything is a cause and effect reaction, new inventions lead to the technology of the future, and even as the generations of the past are slowly forgotten, their influence lives on to this day, affecting how the world eventually turned out and how it will be for generations to come.

and, without toasters, we wouldn't have toast.

Regards
dynamicsofscratch

Anything above that grey line is a signature!
Also, anything can be put in your signature, (also referred as a siggy) including ads but! You cannot do anything else that violates the community guidelines as, you will be reported and you could be banned/muted.
Computer enthusiast, coder, designer and a offline veteran.
700th post

TheCommCraft

dynamicsofscratch wrote:
-unrelated- wrote:
(#33)
dynamicsofscratch wrote:
TheCommCraft wrote:
(#31)
-snip-
hash function is needed to encrypt the data on the communicators end but, that's the least of scratchcommunciation's concerns
There is a hash function being used to create the key for the encryption but the encryption used is AES. To exchange the encryption key, RSA is used. Maybe I am misunderstanding but I don't think what you have said is correct. Also, what do you mean by that last statement?
me getting confused all over again
the last statement is that wait what
visible confusion

What do you mean by that?

Random Project

spamton.gif

DUNGEON_EXPLORATION_03_02_23_01
COMPILED VERSION FOR HIGHER SPEED

-unrelated-

bump

<!DOCTYPE html>

TheCommCraft

bump

Random Project

spamton.gif

DUNGEON_EXPLORATION_03_02_23_01
COMPILED VERSION FOR HIGHER SPEED

-unrelated-

bump

<!DOCTYPE html>

Ghxstify2009

Isn't this exactly what TimMcCool did with ScratchAttach?

Hello! I hope I helped answer your question.

-unrelated-

Ghxstify2009 wrote:
(#39)
Isn't this exactly what TimMcCool did with ScratchAttach?

No. scratchattach only allows for HTTP-like transmission while this supports SOCKS-like transmission and HTTPS-like transmission aswell

Last edited by -unrelated- (May 3, 2024 14:39:04)

<!DOCTYPE html>

Discuss Scratch