Scratch 4.0 Concept by @JloAu

Scratch4-0-

A Concept that adds ideas to Scratch 4.0 and shows what Scratch 4.0 could look like. Thanks to @JloAu for the project!
Link to Project: https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/827943393

undeterministic

no support, there is no PURPLE

Elijah999999

This project contains a number of rejected suggestions however.

1.2 “When stop sign clicked” hat block
This block would allow users to click the stop sign to run a script. However, the stop sign is designed to stop all the scripts in the project. With this block in place, more scripts will start when you want the project to stop, thus defeating the purpose of the stop sign. Regardless, there are workarounds for this block using the timer or ghost effect blocks; these can be found in this post.

This suggestion extends to any block that causes a script to be run as a result of the stop sign being clicked, not just the specific hat block below.

6.4 Live commenting or streaming
This refers to some system where you would not need to refresh the webpage to see new comments that are posted. Some Scratchers think this would be convenient if you are engaged in a conversation with someone so that the conversation moves more quickly (somewhat like how texting works). However, aside from the technological barriers this would bring, it would also put a greater emphasis on the social media aspect of Scratch, moving the focus away from the project-creating aspect. Indeed, project creating is intended to be the primary focus of Scratch.

Those were the only two I could find in the list. Besides those, I highly doubt the Scratch Team would allow you to open new tabs or redirect the user to different links. And I also doubt they would allow changing the pen quality, FPS, or allow projects to download files without your permission.

No longer using the forums unless necessary.

Really, stop with the “support/no support” thing. I don't care if you give a reason. If you have a reason you don't need to add this to your post in the first place. Stop acting like your opinion makes a difference. It doesn't. Opinions were never the point. The point is whether or not it's a good suggestion. If you can give a good reason at why this is a good idea or point out a flaw, do it, but don't take sides.
This is not sarcasm.

DangerPuppy10

No support, development can be very hard. And, most of the ideas here are rejected.
And, technically, this is a list. It's a list of a BUNCH of separated unrelated ideas.

I shall

Workaround chart:

medians

undeterministic wrote:
no support, there is no PURPLE

It doesn't have to be exactly like the project, and the project was created before the purple update.
Though, still a list.

:D: 2.0 is 11 years old https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1018259409/
Medians bamboozled by 3.0 (version 3.0): https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/979822351/
hi875230163394: You're similar to valve in that you both hate a certain number…
Scratch 0.x, 1.x, 2.x, 3.x and LogoBlocks Archives
Bamboozlement: https://scratch.mit.edu/studios/33739789
Years on internet: 15 (soon 16)
medians: Oh god not this utc - 12 thing again..
Fun_Cupcake_i81: What, were you expecting not to see the utc - 12 thing again? THE UTC - 12 THIGN ALWAYS RETURNS. ALWAYS.
medians: I knew it would happen. I was the one who started it last year.
Fun_Cupcake_i81: Well then if you didn't want it back maybe you need to time travel to last year and fix that

Oh wait if you could time travel I think we all know exactly when you would go-
user1: That picture is from 2.0. Now he’s at my house and is my pet.
user2: But this is medians we're talking about, so “from 2.0” can mean the same thing as “from five seconds ago”.
Detect Scratch version here
My other accounts: @selfexplanatory @modesties @chaircard @fireflyhero @dividendyield @colloids @radians @skeuamorphism @dihectogon @anglebisector @aau- @EditBlockColors @AdamantOrb @MoongeistBeam @festively @Ampharos_ @straightforwardness
i trolled redcat LOL

if you see this

{what method did you use::control hat
answer on profile ::motion
} ::operators

;

Stegie1234

undeterministic wrote:
no support, there is no PURPLE

How to change blue to purple:

Open the image in image editing software.
Find a tool that fills and area with colour. This should be easy as it exists in practically all image editing applications.
Set the fill colour to purple.
Click on all the parts that are blue.
Don’t celebrate because you really didn’t achieve anything.

Elijah999999 wrote:
This project contains a number of rejected suggestions however.
[…]
Those were the only two I could find in the list. Besides those, I highly doubt the Scratch Team would allow you to open new tabs or redirect the user to different links. And I also doubt they would allow changing the pen quality, FPS, or allow projects to download files without your permission.

Those are a small fraction of the ideas suggested in that project. There’s no reason to reject all the ideas just because some of them wouldn’t be implemented.

medians wrote:
undeterministic wrote:
no support, there is no PURPLE
It doesn't have to be exactly like the project, and the project was created before the purple update.
Though, still a list.

Huh? Why is everyone talking about lists?

Gerald is spying on you.

Elijah999999

Stegie1234 wrote:
Elijah999999 wrote:
This project contains a number of rejected suggestions however.
[…]
Those were the only two I could find in the list. Besides those, I highly doubt the Scratch Team would allow you to open new tabs or redirect the user to different links. And I also doubt they would allow changing the pen quality, FPS, or allow projects to download files without your permission.
Those are a small fraction of the ideas suggested in that project. There’s no reason to reject all the ideas just because some of them wouldn’t be implemented.

I never said anything about all of these being rejected. I was just pointing out which of them won't be added.

Stegie1234 wrote:
Why is everyone talking about lists?

They're saying this suggestion is actually a list of suggestions, which isn't allowed. You're encouraged instead to make a “separate topic for each suggestion you have.”

No longer using the forums unless necessary.

Really, stop with the “support/no support” thing. I don't care if you give a reason. If you have a reason you don't need to add this to your post in the first place. Stop acting like your opinion makes a difference. It doesn't. Opinions were never the point. The point is whether or not it's a good suggestion. If you can give a good reason at why this is a good idea or point out a flaw, do it, but don't take sides.
This is not sarcasm.

gdfsgdfsgdfg

I’m pretty sure the project owner didn’t use the forums
thats why there are rejected suggestions in here

1000th post also use -forbidden- or highlight and ctrl (optional on some browsers) + shift + down arrow for more of my siggy

We have the craps ®

I gotta go touch sum grass

If it causes issues make it optional - gdfsgdfsgdfg

Do some research before replying to my posts - gdfsgdfsgdfg

curse you 60 sec rule

glory to Gdfsg Land

gdfsgdfsgdfg returns

Ocular(don’t look at my old posts plz)
PostPercent

kumquats? nah
my siggy is built with titani- *gets eaten*

Gdfsg Radio Station:
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1000736602

Are you sleeping you tall cat (project):
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1002042247/

The only suggestions I fully support are:
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/924995948/

Don’t force me to get proof
get it yourself

my favorite topic is this (due to comedic purposes):
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/709979/

my favorite post is this (it’s deleted but I got it from ocular):
https://ocular.jeffalo.net/post/7517300

Grand borrowing cars IV intro and loading (template):
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/972295666/

Guess the game by its mission name:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/750145/

GBC (GTA) topic:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/751981/

BF (Battlefield) topic:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/753243/

still don’t have the popularity lol (atleast I reached 100 followers)

Skill issue

reject

Embrace :)

starlightsparker

i mean, its nice but highly unlikely to be implemented. 4.0 will probably come out in years upon years and when it does, they will probably make a deisgn from scratch (pun unintended) instead of using a user generated one

✮˚. ᵎᵎ ?彡⋆｡˚ starlight !! * ੈ✩‧₊˚ ✧˖° female !! ⋆｡°✩ they.them !!‧˚₊ muslim !!✶ .ᐟ
︶꒦꒷order at star's cafe! served w/ love꒷꒦︶
star's cafe is a store to order banners, pfps, and more!
(rounded) 1000th post | (actual) 1000th post | first post

~ pakistani muslim ~

~ born in arabia

~ palestine supporter! ~
stop the Islam hate! — useful custom blocks — latest project — comment here — Python Learning History
Scratch inspired me to want to become a programmer when i grow up. I plan on learning python :>

A_Nyan_In_Space

Make different posts for each suggestion, also, most of thee are rejected

Periodic Clicker 2 - Play Now! | Gravity Flipper - A Platformer

Discuss Scratch