Discuss Scratch

Rabbsyear3
Scratcher
14 posts

Following Limit

Moonlight1k wrote:

wikibro300000 wrote:

Moonlight1k wrote:

No i agree that we should not follow anyone we see evem though it makes them feel good still it does not make any sense
That sounds, sarcastic, and I hope it is
It's not-
Hi

LP372 wrote:

DisasterPug wrote:

I think there should be a following limit of about 1000 because
-Stop Follow-Everybody accounts
-Stop accounts that are following people for no reason because I saw someone who's following over 5000 people I'm not joking
-Have less F4F but it isn't completely banned
what if your following over 1000
bans would be unfair and ST making you unfollow certain people would annoy them
NO Support
I’ve seen someone with 11000 people following
LP372
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Following Limit

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

There is now no limit now
source?

Projects I want people to see:
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1018171720
DangerPuppy10
Scratcher
500+ posts

Following Limit

Za-Chary wrote:

.

7.3 Ban “follow for follow” (F4F)
Although many Scratchers do not enjoy seeing follow for follow requests, asking someone to participate in follow for follow is relatively harmless. If someone asks you to do follow for follow, and you do not want to, just politely decline their request. If they keep spamming you with requests, you can use the Report button on their comments.

.
This idea was rejected because ^^
So adding a limit for follows will:
  • Really harshly limit f4f
  • Stop follow everybody accounts
  • Ban a few users (or at least make then unfollow people) that did nothing wrong.

Follow everybody accounts and just following people has no harm. It may annoy you, but if some random troll is using 9999 accounts to give you a new unread mail record, then just use the REPORT BUTTON!

Last edited by DangerPuppy10 (March 26, 2024 19:37:25)


I shall




















Workaround chart:

italvera
New to Scratch
99 posts

Following Limit

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

.

7.3 Ban “follow for follow” (F4F)
Although many Scratchers do not enjoy seeing follow for follow requests, asking someone to participate in follow for follow is relatively harmless. If someone asks you to do follow for follow, and you do not want to, just politely decline their request. If they keep spamming you with requests, you can use the Report button on their comments.

.
This idea was rejected because ^^
So adding a limit for follows will:
  • Really harshly limit f4f
  • Stop follow everybody accounts
  • Ban a few users (or at least make then unfollow people) that did nothing wrong.

Follow everybody accounts and just following people has no harm. It may annoy you, but if some random troll is using 9999 accounts to give you a new unread mail record, then just use the REPORT BUTTON!
This aint rejected
yadayadayadagoodbye
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Following Limit

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

.

7.3 Ban “follow for follow” (F4F)
Although many Scratchers do not enjoy seeing follow for follow requests, asking someone to participate in follow for follow is relatively harmless. If someone asks you to do follow for follow, and you do not want to, just politely decline their request. If they keep spamming you with requests, you can use the Report button on their comments.

.
This idea was rejected because ^^
So adding a limit for follows will:
  • Really harshly limit f4f
  • Stop follow everybody accounts
  • Ban a few users (or at least make then unfollow people) that did nothing wrong.

Follow everybody accounts and just following people has no harm. It may annoy you, but if some random troll is using 9999 accounts to give you a new unread mail record, then just use the REPORT BUTTON!
Follow everybody accounts are already pretty much banned

Scratchers that I've cati-fied
ScarVf
Scratcher
30 posts

Following Limit

DisasterPug wrote:

I think there should be a following limit of about 1000 because
-Stop Follow-Everybody accounts
-Stop accounts that are following people for no reason because I saw someone who's following over 5000 people I'm not joking
-Have less F4F but it isn't completely banned

Why not just a ban on “i follow everyone” accs? Like chainmail, you see it, report it and they get a warning and the acc is deleted/deactived, instead of a follower limit. I’m following almost 1000 accs and I check in on almost all of them every 2 months or so. So im with you on everything but the follow limit.

"It doesn't have to be good it just has to be good enough." Northoftheborder
on Youtube

CHIPI CHIPI CHAPA CHAPA LUBI LUBI DABA DABA

Haycat2009
Scratcher
21 posts

Following Limit

Nope. If other users want to follow others let them be. There are worse things in the world like studio invites, trolls, spammers and worst of all violent AND popular projects.

Last edited by Haycat2009 (March 27, 2024 00:46:40)

Rabbsyear3
Scratcher
14 posts

Following Limit

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

There is now no limit now
source?
I’ve seen someone with 11000 following
DangerPuppy10
Scratcher
500+ posts

Following Limit

italvera wrote:

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

.

7.3 Ban “follow for follow” (F4F)
Although many Scratchers do not enjoy seeing follow for follow requests, asking someone to participate in follow for follow is relatively harmless. If someone asks you to do follow for follow, and you do not want to, just politely decline their request. If they keep spamming you with requests, you can use the Report button on their comments.

.
This idea was rejected because ^^
So adding a limit for follows will:
  • Really harshly limit f4f
  • Stop follow everybody accounts
  • Ban a few users (or at least make then unfollow people) that did nothing wrong.

Follow everybody accounts and just following people has no harm. It may annoy you, but if some random troll is using 9999 accounts to give you a new unread mail record, then just use the REPORT BUTTON!
This aint rejected
I never said this was rejected. I was referencing another rejected post.

I shall




















Workaround chart:

DangerPuppy10
Scratcher
500+ posts

Following Limit

yadayadayadagoodbye wrote:

DangerPuppy10 wrote:

Za-Chary wrote:

.

7.3 Ban “follow for follow” (F4F)
Although many Scratchers do not enjoy seeing follow for follow requests, asking someone to participate in follow for follow is relatively harmless. If someone asks you to do follow for follow, and you do not want to, just politely decline their request. If they keep spamming you with requests, you can use the Report button on their comments.

.
This idea was rejected because ^^
So adding a limit for follows will:
  • Really harshly limit f4f
  • Stop follow everybody accounts
  • Ban a few users (or at least make then unfollow people) that did nothing wrong.

Follow everybody accounts and just following people has no harm. It may annoy you, but if some random troll is using 9999 accounts to give you a new unread mail record, then just use the REPORT BUTTON!
Follow everybody accounts are already pretty much banned
I am their last meal I guess…

But seriously, I know that. But, putting a limit on something that's harmless is just not necessary. Again, you can just use the report button if somebody is trolling you with notifications.

I shall




















Workaround chart:

ALLYcat234
Scratcher
20 posts

Following Limit

muellly wrote:

No support. If people want to follow other people at random why stop them? Every one uses Scratch in different ways and why should there be policing to people who want to follow everyone in an attempt to make others happy(even if it's a weak one). Follow everyone accounts aren't hurting anyone. Before you say Scratch isn't about popularity look at the front page. It can be discouraging to be rejected curration or featured or never be top remixed/loved but those sections are still up. People can ask for F4F if they want to, if you don't just say no, however it's when they push you after you say no it becomes a problem that you can just report.
yessss
plantskym2
Scratcher
500+ posts

Following Limit

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

There is now no limit now
source?
I’ve seen someone with 11000 following
Source? Saying you saw something isn't a source.

This is my forum signature! On a forum post, it is okay for Scratchers to advertise in their forum signature. The signature is the stuff that shows up below the horizontal line on the post. It will show up on every post I make. (Credits to ZaChary) My signature thankfully hasn't been eaten by an evil kumquat yet, so I hope it remains that way. My 100th post!! Be sure to follow after watching my animations!!
Please note that I may sometimes give out incorrect information.
Ever wondered why your project wasn't showing up in the search bar or on trending? Here is an explanation why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3p1zLeGoXLQ
LP372
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Following Limit

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

There is now no limit now
source?
I’ve seen someone with 11000 following
People have broke the limit.

Projects I want people to see:
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1018171720
yadayadayadagoodbye
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Following Limit

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

There is now no limit now
source?
I’ve seen someone with 11000 following
People have broke the limit.
This is the one time I think we really need edawg saying source

“people have broke the limit” provides no relevant information, I could also say “you are all legally obliged to give me 10 dollars”, but without any proof, it means nothing.

I do believe class accounts can break the limit, but I am unsure about this (and its rare that they would do that anyways, the only situation which I can think of is for namesnipes, I don't know if that account is deleted or not though)

Scratchers that I've cati-fied
-voidspace-
Scratcher
19 posts

Following Limit

Life_Tutor wrote:

There is already a following limit. A single user can follow a maximum of 10K people.
That is very incorrect. Just look at @griffpatch , @Will_wam , or @Crystalkeeper7 and you'll be proven wrong.

Go check out my game crystal platformer~! 1/5 of the people who play it LOVE it!
It has 100+ hours of work, been called “cool” “non-generic” “amazing” “actually sick” “awesome” “Incredible” and so much more by the fans! Currently there are 16 rooms, enemies, a dedicated studio, A spectate mode, and 2 cutscenes! :D

Link: https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/902050584/
MaRIou-g
Scratcher
12 posts

Following Limit

currently there's a limit of 10,000 scratchers but the limit might be there because nobody wants to click the follow button and see this message:

https://en.scratch-wiki.info/w/images/thumb/FollowerLimit.png/525px-FollowerLimit.png


remember scratchers who have had an account for a while but most follower accounts say they are follower accounts so report that part of the description but 1,000 is also a good limit because most people won't reach that limit. after all, follow accounts are not allowed

Moonlight1k
Scratcher
5 posts

Following Limit

I hate cats
ninjaMAR
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Following Limit

-voidspace- wrote:

(#175)

Life_Tutor wrote:

There is already a following limit. A single user can follow a maximum of 10K people.
That is very incorrect. Just look at @griffpatch , @Will_wam , or @Crystalkeeper7 and you'll be proven wrong.
I am currently following 8335 users (limit is 10k)

MaRIou-g wrote:

(#176)


remember scratchers who have had an account for a while but most follower accounts say they are follower accounts so report that part of the description but 1,000 is also a good limit because most people won't reach that limit. after all, follow accounts are not allowed
I'm above 1000, and I'm not a follow account
Davido2210
Scratcher
8 posts

Following Limit

-voidspace- wrote:

Life_Tutor wrote:

There is already a following limit. A single user can follow a maximum of 10K people.
That is very incorrect. Just look at @griffpatch , @Will_wam , or @Crystalkeeper7 and you'll be proven wrong.
That is 10k FOLLOWERS not 10k FOLLOWING

yadayadayadagoodbye wrote:

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

There is now no limit now
source?
I’ve seen someone with 11000 following
People have broke the limit.
This is the one time I think we really need edawg saying source

“people have broke the limit” provides no relevant information, I could also say “you are all legally obliged to give me 10 dollars”, but without any proof, it means nothing.

I do believe class accounts can break the limit, but I am unsure about this (and its rare that they would do that anyways, the only situation which I can think of is for namesnipes, I don't know if that account is deleted or not though)
(I got here because of @ifollowenglishwords which in turn was found via @angel, but that's unrelated.) @jet-blue has 11729, which is not a class acc. Which means that either there is no limit or the limit has been raised.

Last edited by Davido2210 (May 9, 2024 12:13:01)


Yay! I just found out what a signature is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Maker of Rise of the Wild
That's literally the only thing I can think of about me









stop [ v]
stop [ v]
say [Why do I keep seeing fake blocks in signatures]
LP372
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Following Limit

Davido2210 wrote:

-voidspace- wrote:

Life_Tutor wrote:

There is already a following limit. A single user can follow a maximum of 10K people.
That is very incorrect. Just look at @griffpatch , @Will_wam , or @Crystalkeeper7 and you'll be proven wrong.
That is 10k FOLLOWERS not 10k FOLLOWING

yadayadayadagoodbye wrote:

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

LP372 wrote:

Rabbsyear3 wrote:

There is now no limit now
source?
I’ve seen someone with 11000 following
People have broke the limit.
This is the one time I think we really need edawg saying source

“people have broke the limit” provides no relevant information, I could also say “you are all legally obliged to give me 10 dollars”, but without any proof, it means nothing.

I do believe class accounts can break the limit, but I am unsure about this (and its rare that they would do that anyways, the only situation which I can think of is for namesnipes, I don't know if that account is deleted or not though)
(I got here because of @ifollowenglishwords which in turn was found via @angel, but that's unrelated.) @jet-blue has 11729, which is not a class acc. Which means that either there is no limit or the limit has been raised.
Or, they could've done that before the limit was implemented.

Projects I want people to see:
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/1018171720

Powered by DjangoBB