bump

why does no one respond

among_us1w2 wrote:

why does no one respond

idk you ask me

https://www.deepl.com/whydeepl
maybe proof of DeepL accuracy

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

https://www.deepl.com/whydeepl
maybe proof of DeepL accuracy

so support?

buml

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

https://www.deepl.com/whydeepl
maybe proof of DeepL accuracy

That's their own website, of course they'll fudge the numbers a bit. (Though, DeepL is the most accurate for ENG/JP and JP/ENG translations…)

among_us1w2 wrote:

pasta_enjoyer7 wrote:

Would this be done using Google Translate, or some other application? Google Translate is inaccurate sometimes.

IG Google translate bcse it is what some scratchers use (including paddle2see one time)

How do we know for sure paddle doesn’t speak the language and used translate

That’s irresponsible moderation IMHO because you don’t really know what the person is saying, same reason why I do not support this.

cookieclickerer33 wrote:

among_us1w2 wrote:

pasta_enjoyer7 wrote:

Would this be done using Google Translate, or some other application? Google Translate is inaccurate sometimes.

IG Google translate bcse it is what some scratchers use (including paddle2see one time)

How do we know for sure paddle doesn’t speak the language and used translate

That’s irresponsible moderation IMHO because you don’t really know what the person is saying, same reason why I do not support this.

bru it would be the same situation without translate

I’m going to do the translate abuse test
DeepL and GT
Edit: ugh, the word “Gdfsgdfsgdfg” did worse on DeepL
(they lied to me THEY LIED TO ME well seriously Gdfsgdfsgdfg is not even a word at all)

went to workshop for a game, they already made a chat auto translate

roofogato wrote:

That's their own website, of course they'll fudge the numbers a bit. (Though, DeepL is the most accurate for ENG/JP and JP/ENG translations…)

ok then I will use a 3rd party source if 1st party isn’t credible
https://translatepress.com/deepl-translator-review/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20DeepL%20has%20a,talking%20about%20DeepL%20translation%20accuracy.
Some are about DeepL accuracy

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

roofogato wrote:

That's their own website, of course they'll fudge the numbers a bit. (Though, DeepL is the most accurate for ENG/JP and JP/ENG translations…)

ok then I will use a 3rd party source if 1st party isn’t credible
https://translatepress.com/deepl-translator-review/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20DeepL%20has%20a,talking%20about%20DeepL%20translation%20accuracy.
Some are about DeepL accuracy

among_us1w2 wrote:

bru it would be the same situation without translate

Still, no online translation is perfect. There will always be errors, and moderation should be without error. This is why this suggestion would never work

roofogato wrote:

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

roofogato wrote:

That's their own website, of course they'll fudge the numbers a bit. (Though, DeepL is the most accurate for ENG/JP and JP/ENG translations…)

ok then I will use a 3rd party source if 1st party isn’t credible
https://translatepress.com/deepl-translator-review/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20DeepL%20has%20a,talking%20about%20DeepL%20translation%20accuracy.
Some are about DeepL accuracy

among_us1w2 wrote:

bru it would be the same situation without translate

Still, no online translation is perfect. There will always be errors, and moderation should be without error. This is why this suggestion would never work

any reason why you can report projects that already have been reviewed and forum posts on ST closed topics?

among_us1w2 wrote:

roofogato wrote:

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

roofogato wrote:

That's their own website, of course they'll fudge the numbers a bit. (Though, DeepL is the most accurate for ENG/JP and JP/ENG translations…)

ok then I will use a 3rd party source if 1st party isn’t credible
https://translatepress.com/deepl-translator-review/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20DeepL%20has%20a,talking%20about%20DeepL%20translation%20accuracy.
Some are about DeepL accuracy

among_us1w2 wrote:

bru it would be the same situation without translate

Still, no online translation is perfect. There will always be errors, and moderation should be without error. This is why this suggestion would never work

any reason why you can report projects that already have been reviewed and forum posts on ST closed topics?

?? what

roofogato wrote:

among_us1w2 wrote:

roofogato wrote:

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

roofogato wrote:

That's their own website, of course they'll fudge the numbers a bit. (Though, DeepL is the most accurate for ENG/JP and JP/ENG translations…)

ok then I will use a 3rd party source if 1st party isn’t credible
https://translatepress.com/deepl-translator-review/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20DeepL%20has%20a,talking%20about%20DeepL%20translation%20accuracy.
Some are about DeepL accuracy

among_us1w2 wrote:

bru it would be the same situation without translate

Still, no online translation is perfect. There will always be errors, and moderation should be without error. This is why this suggestion would never work

any reason why you can report projects that already have been reviewed and forum posts on ST closed topics?

?? what

exactly

Si, porque intentar añadir funciones complejas a un software de foros viejo y descontinuado es muy fácil

Aunque el foro de Español sea todos los otros combinados en uno solo, y es confuso, todavía creo que va a ser difícil implementar esta sugerencia

También se debería tener en cuenta lo fácil que se pueden perder las cosas en traducción, como alguien más dijo acá, ninguna traducción en línea es perfecta

Y si si se encuentra un modo de añadir todo esto, luego se tendrá que tomar en cuenta el trabajo extra de los moderadores, y de lo que yo veo todos siempre intentan reducir su trabajo, así que yo voy a seguirlos xd

among_us1w2 wrote:

roofogato wrote:

among_us1w2 wrote:

roofogato wrote:

gdfsgdfsgdfg wrote:

roofogato wrote:

snip

snio

among_us1w2 wrote:

snip

Still, no online translation is perfect. There will always be errors, and moderation should be without error. This is why this suggestion would never work

any reason why you can report projects that already have been reviewed and forum posts on ST closed topics?

?? what

exactly

????

Vetzlan wrote:

Si, porque intentar añadir funciones complejas a un software de foros viejo y descontinuado es muy fácil

Aunque el foro de Español sea todos los otros combinados en uno solo, y es confuso, todavía creo que va a ser difícil implementar esta sugerencia

También se debería tener en cuenta lo fácil que se pueden perder las cosas en traducción, como alguien más dijo acá, ninguna traducción en línea es perfecta

Y si si se encuentra un modo de añadir todo esto, luego se tendrá que tomar en cuenta el trabajo extra de los moderadores, y de lo que yo veo todos siempre intentan reducir su trabajo, así que yo voy a seguirlos xd

这个建议也可以与话语建议交织在一起，所以把它和一勺冰淇淋一起考虑吧

among_us1w2 wrote:

Vetzlan wrote:

Si, porque intentar añadir funciones complejas a un software de foros viejo y descontinuado es muy fácil

Aunque el foro de Español sea todos los otros combinados en uno solo, y es confuso, todavía creo que va a ser difícil implementar esta sugerencia

También se debería tener en cuenta lo fácil que se pueden perder las cosas en traducción, como alguien más dijo acá, ninguna traducción en línea es perfecta

Y si si se encuentra un modo de añadir todo esto, luego se tendrá que tomar en cuenta el trabajo extra de los moderadores, y de lo que yo veo todos siempre intentan reducir su trabajo, así que yo voy a seguirlos xd

这个建议也可以与话语建议交织在一起，所以把它和一勺冰淇淋一起考虑吧

I'm fairly certain “This advice can be mixed with advice, so consider it with ice cream” isn't what you meant to say, which shows how online translations aren't accurate. I don't know what you were trying to say, and because the translation failed, I cannot help you