kkidslogin wrote:

EDawg2011 wrote:

bruh I had to delete my link-to-quote bc grumpy filterbot

kkidslogin wrote:

I think “New to Scratch” and “New Scratcher” don't align exactly—I think I've seen Scratchers marked “New to Scratch” on the forums before, which is probably why it's different on the forums.

Are you sure it isn't just a Mandela effect? I don't think I've seen that before other than it being a visual bug.

I'm sure I've seen it before.

I gotta say, I'm not convinced. For as long as I can remember (all the way back to 2018), “New to Scratch” and “New Scratcher” mean the same thing.

EDawg2011 wrote:

-snip-Are you sure it isn't just a Mandela effect? I don't think I've seen that before other than it being a visual bug.

See this: . I wonder why that's the case though.

54387a wrote:

EDawg2011 wrote:

snip

See this: . I wonder why that's the case though.

They're still a New Scratcher.

Za-Chary wrote:

kkidslogin wrote:

EDawg2011 wrote:

bruh I had to delete my link-to-quote bc grumpy filterbot

kkidslogin wrote:

I think “New to Scratch” and “New Scratcher” don't align exactly—I think I've seen Scratchers marked “New to Scratch” on the forums before, which is probably why it's different on the forums.

Are you sure it isn't just a Mandela effect? I don't think I've seen that before other than it being a visual bug.

I'm sure I've seen it before.

I gotta say, I'm not convinced. For as long as I can remember (all the way back to 2018), “New to Scratch” and “New Scratcher” mean the same thing.

I'd argue otherwise.
New to Scratch infers the users, well, new to Scratch, while New Scratcher infers the accounts a new account.
Sure, neither works all the time, but plenty of users are still New Scratchers.

CYTOTOXIC_1 wrote:

7salad3salad wrote:

I dont really see how anyone could get confused with “New Scratcher” and “New to Scratch”

Even if you don't confuse ‘New to Scratch’ with ‘New Scratcher’ maybe some others can

That's literally my question. I would like to know how others could possibly get confused as they mean the exact same thing.

7salad3salad wrote:

CYTOTOXIC_1 wrote:

7salad3salad wrote:

snip

snip

That's literally my question. I would like to know how others could possibly get confused as they mean the exact same thing.

People might get annoyed by the inconsistency.

EDawg2011 wrote:

7salad3salad wrote:

CYTOTOXIC_1 wrote:

7salad3salad wrote:

snip

snip

That's literally my question. I would like to know how others could possibly get confused as they mean the exact same thing.

People might get annoyed by the inconsistency.

Sure maybe it's annoying but I don't see how it could confuse anyone.

EDawg2011 wrote:

(#20)

kkidslogin wrote:

EDawg2011 wrote:

kkidslogin wrote:

snip

snip

I'm sure I've seen it before.

Did you check their profile to make sure and if so, can you send me a link or proof? It's probably just a false memory.

I did check, but I can't find the link. It was a while ago; the person in question is probably a Scratcher now.

7salad3salad wrote:

EDawg2011 wrote:

7salad3salad wrote:

CYTOTOXIC_1 wrote:

7salad3salad wrote:

snip

snip

That's literally my question. I would like to know how others could possibly get confused as they mean the exact same thing.

People might get annoyed by the inconsistency.

Sure maybe it's annoying but I don't see how it could confuse anyone.

I find it somewhat confusing due to how it's worded, in a sense. Others, maybe not.

7salad3salad wrote:

EDawg2011 wrote:

snip

Sure maybe it's annoying but I don't see how it could confuse anyone.

It's confusing because it can throw you off.

RecessFailsOffical wrote:

#11
Support. I was confused when I first saw that.

Semi support, its good but it still coveys the message they are new to scratch.

Roblox888i wrote:

Semi support, its good but it still coveys the message they are new to scratch.

It's consistent with the rest of the website; that's why the ST should implement this suggestion. Can you explain why you only semi-support?

EDawg2011 wrote:

Roblox888i wrote:

Semi support, its good but it still coveys the message they are new to scratch.

It's consistent with the rest of the website; that's why the ST should implement this suggestion. Can you explain why you only semi-support?

Its not that bad

bump

irrelevant, trivial, useless. the ST has better things to change than the already clear wording on some rank.
i literally never even noticed it. suggestions like these are made just for the sake of being made.

“bbut the inconsistency!1!1!” your problem. if it's not broken, don't fix it. i don't get why we need these changes that are only ever considerable good because some users like the way it looks.

EDawg2011 wrote:

Roblox888i wrote:

Semi support, its good but it still coveys the message they are new to scratch.

It's consistent with the rest of the website; that's why the ST should implement this suggestion. Can you explain why you only semi-support?

The only reason the ST will ever implement this suggestion is to pretend that they listen to their users by adding these quick effortless things.

the most confusion someone can get from this is “huh I wonder why on my profile it says New Scratcher and on the forums it says New to Scratch”. there is no harm in leaving the wording like this, other than triggering the perfectionism of some forumers.

SIovakia wrote:

irrelevant, trivial, useless. the ST has better things to change than the already clear wording on some rank.
i literally never even noticed it. suggestions like these are made just for the sake of being made.

“bbut the inconsistency!1!1!” your problem. if it's not broken, don't fix it. i don't get why we need these changes that are only ever considerable good because some users like the way it looks.

EDawg2011 wrote:

Roblox888i wrote:

Semi support, its good but it still coveys the message they are new to scratch.

It's consistent with the rest of the website; that's why the ST should implement this suggestion. Can you explain why you only semi-support?

The only reason the ST will ever implement this suggestion is to pretend that they listen to their users by adding these quick effortless things.

the most confusion someone can get from this is “huh I wonder why on my profile it says New Scratcher and on the forums it says New to Scratch”. there is no harm in leaving the wording like this, other than triggering the perfectionism of some forumers.

Slovakia breaking bad, as usual.

I rather agree with this. It's a pointless, not really needed change. I'm not against it, if they really aren't different though. I am perfectly happy with pointless changes if they have the time.

bump
“Sorry, you have to wait 60 seconds between posts.”

EDawg2011 wrote:

There's pretty much no point to this.

There isn't really a point in changing “new to scratch” to “new scratcher” either.

BendyOl183 wrote:

EDawg2011 wrote:

There's pretty much no point to this.

There isn't really a point in changing “new to scratch” to “new scratcher” either.

It really makes me angry when I see new to scratch. Support

EDawg2011 wrote:

Did you know how “New to Scratch” appears instead of “New Scratcher” in a post a New Scratcher made? There's pretty much no point to this. It's confusing and it could throw off some users. Instead, make it say “New Scratcher” like it does on profiles.

I don't think anybody ever got thrown off by “New to Scratch” or “New Scratcher” — worse case scenario they notice it, not get confused by it