SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

Wix pages also don't support old browsers and aren't ‘handheld friendly’.

Redstone1080 wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

Wix pages also don't support old browsers and aren't ‘handheld friendly’.

True, but is there any reason for them to? Nearly nobody uses these devices and browsers (which are probably 7+ years old at this point, but most likely even more) and they don't get updates at all. It's impossible to move forward and use modern frameworks and technologies while also supporting these devices, so all web developers don't support these at all.

tl;dr:

bigspeedfpv wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

bigspeedfpv wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

many of them create invalid HTML.

no they don't?

Wix, which I once used, does depending on what you count as invalid HTML. Wix pages also don't support old browsers and aren't ‘handheld friendly’.

wix definitely creates valid HTML lol?? otherwise the websites wouldn't work?

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

Using a website maker is the worst thing you can do. You learn nothing and many of them create invalid HTML.

PlNG_ wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

Using a website maker is the worst thing you can do. You learn nothing and many of them create invalid HTML.

yet your website uses the center, marquee and font tags…

PlNG_ wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

Using a website maker is the worst thing you can do. You learn nothing and many of them create invalid HTML.

yet your website uses the center, marquee and font tags…

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

Just because its valid doesn't mean it's good. Take using the center and marque elements for example.

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

Just because its valid doesn't mean it's good. Take using the center and marque elements for example.

As PPPDUD and I said, no alternative properly supports old browsers.

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

bigspeedfpv wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

bigspeedfpv wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

many of them create invalid HTML.

no they don't?

Wix, which I once used, does depending on what you count as invalid HTML. Wix pages also don't support old browsers and aren't ‘handheld friendly’.

wix definitely creates valid HTML lol?? otherwise the websites wouldn't work?

Most browsers can read invalid HTML but this isn't an excuse.

bigspeedfpv wrote:

no they cant
drop an example of the invalid HTML

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

Just because its valid doesn't mean it's good. Take using the center and marque elements for example.

As PPPDUD and I said, no alternative properly supports old browsers.

You shouldn't worry about old browser support as they are old.

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

MagicCrayon9342 wrote:

Just because its valid doesn't mean it's good. Take using the center and marque elements for example.

As PPPDUD and I said, no alternative properly supports old browsers.

You shouldn't worry about old browser support as they are old.

More people use IE or BlackBerry Browser than Catalyst.

TheGlassPenguin wrote:

i myself know a bit of html and js (look at my github if you want to see my extremely bad skill), but i still run my own website (the blog one) on a self-hosted wordpress instance since i am not good with web design and i also like having a gui to manage blog articles.

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

bigspeedfpv wrote:

no they cant
drop an example of the invalid HTML

I can't give an example from Wix but this an example of invalid code that Firefox will accept:
<h1>Text<h1>

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

bigspeedfpv wrote:

no they cant
drop an example of the invalid HTML

I can't give an example from Wix but this an example of invalid code that Firefox will accept:
<h1>Text<h1>

WojtekGame wrote:

add the /

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

I can't give an example from Wix but this is an example of invalid code that Firefox will accept:
<h1>Text<h1>

SAVVYSCLUTTER wrote:

<h1>Text<h1>